[Neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer]. / Traitement néoadjuvant des cancers du rectum.

The management of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer has improved significantly in the past few years with preoperative radiotherapy (RT) and total mesorectal excision. The rate of local recurrence is now around 5 % while the risk of metastatic recurrence has not been reduced which is about 30 %. The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy remains questionable apart from patients with ypN+tumor after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for whom FOLFOX is an option. In recent years, several therapeutic trials have evaluated the benefit of extending the time between the end of RT and surgery and/or the benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, administered as induction (before RT) or in consolidation (after RT and before surgery). The first results of two positive phase 3 trials, PRODIGE 23 and RAPIDO, have been reported in 2020. The two regimens evaluated in these trials are markedly different but have shown that neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly reduces the risk of distant metastasis. Current developments largely related to a de-escalation of therapy: organ conservation according to a "Watch and Wait" strategy or local resection of the scar, administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy without RT. These therapeutic strategies have not yet been validated but should be in the news tomorrow. The purpose of this review is to present recent data reported in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

What is the Best Therapeutic Strategy for Metachronous Resectable Colorectal Liver Metastases After Adjuvant Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy? A Multidisciplinary Inter-Group Survey.

BACKGROUND: To report the current clinical practice of French physicians for metachronous resectable liver metastasis (LM) occurring after a FOLFOX adjuvant chemotherapy for primary cancer. METHODS: Twenty four clinical situations were proposed to a panel of experts via 4 learned societies. Clinical situations varied according time of recurrence (early between 6 and 12 month or > 12 month), extension of LM (limited ≤ 2 or extended > 2 lesions), presence of a neuropathy or not, and of a RAS or BRAF mutation. RESULTS: A total of 157 physicians participated in this study. A consensus was reached in 17 (71%) clinical situations. For an early limited recurrence, whatever presence of neuropathy, the preferred therapeutic approach (45%) was upfront surgery. For an early extended recurrence, whatever presence of neuropathy, there was a consensus (64%) for a preoperative chemotherapy by FOLFIRI + biologic agent. For a late recurrence without neuropathy, there was a consensus (50%) for a preoperative FOLFOX chemotherapy, whatever the extension of LM. For a late recurrence with neuropathy, upfront surgery was chosen (52%) for limited LM, and preoperative chemotherapy by FOLFIRI + biologic agent (73%) for extended LM. No response was influenced by the RAS mutation status. There was a strong consensus for intensified preoperative chemotherapy in all clinical situations for BRAF-mutated LM. CONCLUSIONS: This national survey provides an overview of the practice patterns in the treatment of LM occurring after adjuvant FOLFOX for primary. It could be a basis to establish expert's recommendations for the clinical practice.

NORAD01-GRECCAR16 multicenter phase III non-inferiority randomized trial comparing preoperative modified FOLFIRINOX without irradiation to radiochemotherapy for resectable locally advanced rectal cancer (intergroup FRENCH-GRECCAR- PRODIGE trial).

BACKGROUND: Preoperative radiochemotherapy (RCT) is recommended in France prior to total mesorectal excision in patients with mid or low locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) (cT3/T4 and/or N+) because it has been shown to improve local control. Preoperative RCT has also disadvantages including the absence of proven impact on metastatic recurrence and the risk of late side effects on bowel and genitourinary function. In patients with primarily resectable LARC, preoperative systemic chemotherapy without pelvic irradiation could be used as an alternative to RCT. METHODS: This study is a multicenter, open-label randomized, 2-arm phase III non-inferiority trial. Patients with mid or low resectable LARC (cT3N0 or cT1-T3N+ with circumferential resection margin [CRM] > 2 mm on pretreatment MRI) will be randomized to either modified FOLFIRINOX for 3 months or RCT (Cap50 intensified-modulated radiotherapy). All patients have restaging MRI after preoperative treatment. The primary endpoint is 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) from the time to randomization including progression during preoperative treatment. Secondary endpoints are treatment related toxicity, treatment compliance, R0 resection rate, sphincter saving surgery rate, postoperative morbidity and mortality rates, loco-regional recurrence free survival, overall survival, bowel and sexual functions at diagnosis, quality of life, radiologic and pathologic response after preoperative treatment. The number of patients required is 574. DISCUSSION: The choice of modified FOLFIRINOX for preoperative chemotherapy is supported by recent and consistent data on safety and efficacy of this regimen on rectal cancer. The use of preoperative chemotherapy instead of RCT could be associated with pronounced advantages in terms of functional results and quality of life in cancer survivors. However and first of all, the non-inferiority of preoperative chemotherapy compared to RCT on oncologic outcome has to be validated. If this study demonstrates the non-inferiority of chemotherapy compared to RCT, this can lead to a crucial change in clinical practice in a large subset of rectal cancer patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03875781 (March 15, 2019). Version 1.1.

Preoperative oral polymeric diet enriched with transforming growth factor-beta 2 (Modulen) could decrease postoperative morbidity after surgery for complicated ileocolonic Crohn's disease.

OBJECTIVE: Exclusive polymeric diet enriched with transforming growth factor-beta 2 (ANS-TGF-ß2) has been used for remission induction and maintenance in pediatric Crohn's disease (CD). Its use in the preoperative setting has never been evaluated. The aim of this study was to evaluate preoperative ANS-TGF-ß2 to decrease postoperative complications after surgery for complicated ileocolonic CD. METHODS: From 2011 to 2015, data of all consecutive patients who underwent elective surgery for ileocolonic CD were collected prospectively. Preoperative, exclusive ANS-TGF-ß2 was administered in high-risk patients with complicated CD. Complicated CD was defined by the presence of obstructive symptoms, and/or steroid treatment, and/or preoperative weight loss >10% and/or perforating CD. Outcomes of high-risk patients receiving preoperative ANS-TGF-ß2 were compared to those of low-risk patients with no complicated CD who underwent upfront surgery. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients underwent surgery for ileocolonic CD. Among them, 35 high-risk patients received preoperative ANS-TGF-ß2 and 21 low-risk patients underwent upfront surgery. Preoperative full-dose ANS-TGF-ß2 was feasible in 34/35 high-risk patients. Discontinuation of steroids during preoperative ANS-TGF-ß2 could be achieved in 10/16 patients (62.5%). Postoperative complications rates were 8/35 (23.8%) and 5/21 (22.9%) in high-risk and low-risk patients, respectively (p = 1). Temporary ileocolostomy rates in high-risk patients and in low-risk patients were 4/35 (11%) and 0/21, respectively (p = 0.286) Conclusion: Preoperative ANS-TGF-ß2 is feasible in most high-risk patients with complicated ileocolonic CD and could limit the deleterious effects of risk factors of postoperative morbidity. These results need to be confirmed in a large randomized controlled trial.

Prognostic Value of Sterilized Lymph Nodes After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Patients with ypN0 Rectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with ypN0 rectal cancer who have received preoperative chemoradiotherapy can be divided into those who initially were node negative and those whose positive nodes have been sterilized by preoperative therapy. The long-term prognosis for ypN0 patients with sterilized lymph nodes (LNS) is unknown. This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of LNS after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for patients with ypN0 rectal cancer. METHODS: From January 2007 to March 2014, 206 patients with ypN0 tumors of the mid or lower rectum treated by chemoradiotherapy and radical surgery were enrolled in the study. Of these 206 patients, 49 had ypN0 tumors with LNS (LNS+ group), and 157 had ypN0 tumors without LNS (LNS- group). The patients in both groups were comparable in terms of tumor characteristics, type of chemoradiotherapy, type of surgery, R0 resection rate, and postoperative complication rate. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 40.5 ± 27 months. The 1- and 3-year OS rates in the LNS+ group were respectively 100 and 95.5% versus 99.4 and 91.6% in the LNS- group (P = 0.549). The 1- and 3-year DFS rates in the LNS+ group were respectively 100 and 94.2% versus 94.7 and 87.1% in the LNS- group (P = 0.117). The multivariate analysis showed that the presence of LNS did not affect OS (P = 0.918) or DFS (P = 0.209). CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis is excellent for patients with ypN0 rectal cancer who have LNS after preoperative chemoradiotherapy. The presence of LNS in ypN0 rectal cancer patients after chemoradiotherapy should not be considered a factor for a poor prognosis.

Interest of preoperative immunonutrition in liver resection for cancer: study protocol of the PROPILS trial, a multicenter randomized controlled phase IV trial.

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition is an independent risk factor of postoperative morbidity and mortality and it's observed in 20 to 50% of surgical patients. Preoperative interventions to optimize the nutritional status, reduce postoperative complications and enteral nutrition has proven to be superior to the parenteral one. Moreover, regardless of the nutritional status of the patient, surgery impairs the immunological response, thus increasing the risk of postoperative sepsis. Immunonutrition has been developed to improve the immunometabolic host response in perioperative period and it has been proven to reduce significantly postoperative infectious complications and length of hospital stay in patients undergoing elective gastrointestinal surgery for tumors. We hypothesize that a preoperative oral immunonutrition (ORAL IMPACT®) can reduce postoperative morbidity in liver resection for cancer. METHODS/DESIGN: Prospective multicenter randomized placebo-controlled double-blind phase IV trial with two parallel treatment groups receiving either study product (ORAL IMPACT®) or control supplement (isocaloric isonitrogenous supplement--IMPACT CONTROL®) for 7 days before liver resection for cancer. A total of 400 patients will be enrolled. Patients will be stratified according to the type of hepatectomy, the presence of chronic liver disease and the investigator center. The main end-point is to evaluate in intention-to-treat analysis the overall 30-day morbidity. Secondary end-points are to assess the 30-day infectious and non-infectious morbidity, length of antibiotic treatment and hospital stay, modifications on total food intake, compliance to treatment, side-effects of immunonutrition, impact on liver regeneration and sarcopenia, and to perform a medico-economic analysis. DISCUSSION: The overall morbidity rate after liver resection is 22% to 42%. Infectious post-operative complications (12% to 23%) increase the length of hospital stay and costs and are responsible for a quarter of 30-day mortality. Various methods have been advocated to decrease the rate of postoperative complications but there is no evidence to support or refute the use of any treatment and further trials are required. The effects of preoperative oral immunonutrition in non-cirrhotic patients undergoing liver resection for cancer are unknown. The present trial is designed to evaluate whether the administration of a short-term preoperative oral immunonutrition can reduce postoperative morbidity in non-cirrhotic patients undergoing liver resection for cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrial.gov: NCT02041871.

Rectal cancer surgery with or without bowel preparation: The French GRECCAR III multicenter single-blinded randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess with a single-blinded, multicenter, randomized trial, the postoperative results in patients undergoing sphincter-saving rectal resection for cancer without preoperative mechanical bowel preparation (MBP). BACKGROUND: The collective evidence from literature strongly suggests that MBP, before elective colonic surgery, is of no benefit in terms of postoperative morbidity. Very few data and no randomized study are available for rectal surgery and preliminary results conclude toward the safety of rectal resection without MBP. METHODS: From October 2007 to January 2009, patients scheduled for elective rectal cancer sphincter-saving resection were randomized to receive preoperative MBP (ie, retrograde enema and oral laxatives) or not. Primary endpoint was the overall 30-day morbidity rate. Secondary endpoints included mortality rate, anastomotic leakage rate, major morbidity rate (Dindo III or more), degree of discomfort for the patient, and hospital stay. RESULTS: A total of 178 patients (103 men), including 89 in both groups (no-MBP and MBP groups), were included in the study. The overall and infectious morbidity rates were significantly higher in no-MBP versus MBP group, 44% versus 27%, P = 0.018, and 34% versus 16%, P = 0.005, respectively. Regarding both anastomotic leakage and major morbidity rates, there was no significant difference between no-MBP and MBP group: 19% versus 10% (P = 0.09) and 18% versus 11% (P = 0.69), respectively. Moderate or severe discomfort was reported by 40% of prepared patients. Mortality rate (1.1% vs 3.4%) and mean hospital stay (16 vs 14 days) did not differ significantly between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: This first randomized trial demonstrated that rectal cancer surgery without MBP was associated with higher risk of overall and infectious morbidity rates without any significant increase of anastomotic leakage rate. Thus, it suggests continuing to perform MBP before elective rectal resection for cancer.