Right atrial septal electrode for reducing the atrial defibrillation threshold.

BACKGROUND: The atrial defibrillation threshold (ADFT) energy of the standard lead configuration, right atrial appendage (RAA) to coronary sinus (CS), was reduced by >50% with the addition of a third electrode traversing the atrial septum in a previous study. This study determined whether the ADFT would be lowered by a more clinically practical third electrode placed in the right atrium along the atrial septum (RSP). METHODS AND RESULTS: Sustained atrial fibrillation was induced in 8 closed-chest sheep with burst pacing and maintained with pericardial infusion of acetyl-beta-methylcholine chloride. A custom-made, dual-defibrillation catheter was placed with electrodes in the lateral RA, CS, and RSP. A separate defibrillation catheter was also placed in the RAA. ADFT characteristics of RAA-->CS and 6 other single- or sequential-shock configurations were determined in random order by using biphasic, truncated-exponential waveforms in a multiple-reversal protocol. The delivered-energy, peak-voltage, and peak-current ADFTs for the sequential-shock configuration CS-->RSP/RA-->RSP (0.53+/-0.31 J, 86+/-22 V, and 1.6+/-0.6 A, respectively) were significantly lower than those of RAA-->CS (1.14+/-0.64 J, 157+/-34 V, and 2.5+/-1.1 A, respectively). The ADFT characteristics of RAA-->CS and RA-->CS were not significantly different, nor were those of CS-->RSP/RA-->RSP and CS-->RSP/RAA--> RSP. CONCLUSIONS: The ADFT of the standard RAA-->CS configuration may be markedly reduced with an additional electrode situated at the RSP.

Atrial defibrillation thresholds of electrode configurations available to an atrioventricular defibrillator.

INTRODUCTION: Little investigation has been conducted to assess the atrial defibrillation thresholds of electrode configurations using electrodes designed for internal ventricular defibrillation (right ventricle [RV], superior vena cava [SVC], and pulse generator housing [Can]) combined with coronary sinus (CS) electrodes. We hypothesized that a CS-->SVC+Can electrode configuration would have a lower atrial defibrillation threshold than a standard configuration for defibrillation, RV-->SVC+Can. We also tested the atrial defibrillation thresholds of five other configurations. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 12 closed chest sheep, we situated a two-coil (RV, SVC) defibrillation catheter, a left-pectoral subcutaneous Can, and a CS lead. Atrial fibrillation was burst induced and maintained with continuous infusion of intrapericardial acetyl-beta-methylcholine chloride. Using fixed-tilt biphasic shocks, we determined the atrial defibrillation thresholds of seven test configurations in random order according to a multiple-reversal protocol. The peak voltage and delivered energy atrial defibrillation thresholds of CS-->SVC+Can (168+/-67 V, 2.68+/-2.40 J) were significantly lower than those of RV-->SVC+Can (215+/-88 V, 4.46+/-3.40 J). The atrial defibrillation thresholds of the other test configurations were RV+CS-->SVC+Can: 146+/-59 V, 1.92+/-1.45 J; RV-->CS+SVC+Can: 191+/-89 V, 3.53+/-3.19 J; CS-->SVC: 188+/-98 V, 3.77+/-4.14 J; SVC-->CS+ Can: 265+/-145 V, 7.37+/-9.12 J; and SVC-->Can: 516+/-209 V, 24.5+/-15.0 J. CONCLUSIONS: The atrial defibrillation threshold of CS-->SVC+Can is significantly lower than that of RV-->SVC+Can. In addition, the low atrial defibrillation threshold of RV+CS-->SVC+Can merits further investigation. Based on corroboration of low atrial defibrillation thresholds of CS-based configurations in humans, physicians might consider using CS leads with atrioventricular defibrillators.

Reduction of atrial defibrillation threshold with an interatrial septal electrode.

BACKGROUND: The standard lead configuration for internal atrial defibrillation consists of a shock between electrodes in the right atrial appendage (RAA) and coronary sinus (CS). We tested the hypothesis that the atrial defibrillation threshold (ADFT) of this RAA-->CS configuration would be lowered with use of an additional electrode at the atrial septum (SP). METHODS AND RESULTS: Sustained atrial fibrillation was induced in 8 closed-chest sheep with burst pacing and continuous pericardial infusion of acetyl-ss-methylcholine. Defibrillation electrodes were situated in the RAA, CS, pulmonary artery (PA), low right atrium (LRA), and across the SP. ADFTs of RAA-->CS and 4 other lead configurations were determined in random order by use of a multiple-reversal protocol. Biphasic waveforms of 3/1-ms duration were used for all single and sequential shocks. The ADFT delivered energies for the single-shock configurations were 1.27+/-0.67 J for RAA-->CS and 0. 86+/-0.59 J for RAA+CS-->SP; the ADFTs for the sequential-shock configurations were 0.39+/-0.18 J for RAA-->SP/CS-->SP, 1.16+/-0.72 J for CS-->SP/RAA-->SP, and 0.68+/-0.46 J for RAA-->CS/LRA-->PA. Except for CS-->SP/RAA-->SP versus RAA-->CS and RAA-->CS/LRA-->PA versus RAA+CS-->SP, the ADFT delivered energies of all of the configurations were significantly different from each other (P:<0. 05). CONCLUSIONS: The ADFT of the standard RAA-->CS configuration is markedly reduced with an additional electrode at the atrial SP.