Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Curr Oncol Rep ; 25(6): 559-568, 2023 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36939963

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Integrative oncology (IO) services provide a wide range of complementary medicine therapies, many of which can augment the beneficial effects of conventional supportive and palliative care for patients with ovarian cancer. This study aims to assess the current state of integrative oncology research in ovarian cancer care. RECENT FINDINGS: We review the clinical research both supporting the effectiveness of leading IO modalities in ovarian cancer care as well as addressing potential safety-related concerns. There is growing amount of clinical research supporting the use of IO and implementation of integrative gynecological oncology models of care within the conventional supportive cancer care setting. Additional research is still needed in order to create clinical guidelines for IO interventions for the treatment of female patients with ovarian cancer. These guidelines need to address both effectiveness and safety-related issues, providing oncology healthcare professionals with indications for which these patients can be referred to the IO treatment program.


Asunto(s)
Terapias Complementarias , Medicina Integrativa , Oncología Integrativa , Neoplasias , Neoplasias Ováricas , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias/terapia , Neoplasias Ováricas/terapia , Oncología Médica
2.
J Patient Exp ; 8: 23743735211049665, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34722868

RESUMEN

The aim was to examine the association of patient-reported physician awareness of biological CAM use and patient perceptions of care experience and quality with a population-based study of patients with incident lung and colorectal cancer. This was a secondary data analysis using regression models. Outcomes of interest were patient reports of medical care experience and quality ratings. Among 716 patients who reported biological CAM use, 69% reported their physicians were aware of this. Patients who reported physician awareness of biological CAM use had higher adjusted scores for medical care experience ( + 5.4, 95%CI:2.3,8.6) and care quality ( + 3.6, 95%CI:-0.3, + 7.5). These associations suggest that physicians should be encouraged to inquire about biological CAM use.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA