[Prostatic Urethral Lift under local anesthesia: Single-centre retrospective observational study]. / La pose d'implant UroLift ® sous anesthésie locale : étude observationnelle rétrospective monocentrique.

INTRODUCTION: Urolift implant placement may be preferred to conventional endoscopic surgery for patients who wish to preserve their sexuality or for those who prefer a rapid post-operative recovery. The absence of general anaesthesia is an important element that reinforces the minimally invasive aspect of the procedure and improves the speed of recovery. The aim of this work was to report our preliminary experience of Urolift treatment under local anaesthesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted including all patients treated with Urolift between 2017 and 2021 in our centre. Local anaesthesia was based on the instillation of 2 Xylocaine gels at 4°C into the urethra 15minutes before the procedure. The primary endpoint was the successful completion of the procedure without interruption due to pain or the need for any other form of anaesthesia or analgesia. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were included with a median age of 65 years and a prostate volume of 46mL. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was 23. The first 3 patients were operated on under general anaesthesia. Local anaesthesia was introduced from the fourth patient onwards. There was no recourse to other modalities of analgesia or anaesthesia or interruption of the procedure. The operating time was 10minutes and pain was assessed at 1 on a visual analogue scale. At 3 months, the IPSS score was 9 (P=0.001). CONCLUSION: This preliminary experience confirms the feasibility of placing the Urolift implant under local anaesthesia without any failure of the proposed management. The improvement in IPSS score was consistent with previously published clinical trials. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Coronary revascularization: a procedure in transition from on-pump to off-pump? The role of glucose-insulin-potassium revisited in a randomized, placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate an optimized glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK) solution regimen as an alternate myocardial protective strategy in off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (OP-CAB) surgery and as a supplement to conventional coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled. SETTING: Single institution, cardiothoracic specialty hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-four patients scheduled for elective multivessel coronary artery surgery using either conventional CPB (n = 22) or OP-CAB techniques (n = 22). INTERVENTIONS: Preischemic, ischemic, and postischemic administration of GIK solution was carried out, optimally dosed to ensure nonesterified fatty acid (NEFA) suppression, and supplemented with magnesium, a glycolytic enzymatic cofactor. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: GIK solution therapy reduced plasma NEFA levels (p < 0.001) in OP-CAB surgery and CPB groups but failed to affect the incidence of non-Q wave perioperative myocardial infarction, incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation, incidence of postoperative infection, reduction in creatinine clearance, or duration of postoperative intensive care unit or hospital length of stay. After adjusting for GIK solution therapy, OP-CAB surgery resulted in significantly less ischemic injury (troponin I >15 microg/L, 19.0% v 91.3%; p = 0.0001) and reduced postoperative infections (14.3% v 43.5%; p = 0.049). CONCLUSION: GIK solution therapy achieved NEFA suppression and an insignificant trend toward reduced biochemical parameters of ischemic injury in OP-CAB surgery and CPB groups, but no major clinical benefit (perioperative myocardial infarction, intensive care unit length of stay, or hospital length of stay) was shown after elective CABG surgery in low-risk patients. Compared with CPB, OP-CAB surgery significantly reduced ischemic injury and postoperative infections.