Higher protein intake improves length, not weight, z scores in preterm infants.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the relation between nutritional intake (kilocalories, protein) and weight and length growth in preterm infants, and to describe their metabolic tolerance with a focus on those with high protein intake (≥ 4.6 g · kg(-1) · day(-1)). METHODS: Secondary analysis of data from appropriate-for-gestational age preterm infants in a 28-day randomized clinical trial that evaluated growth, tolerance, and safety of a new ultraconcentrated liquid human milk fortifier (original study n = 150). This subset of 56 infants had complete growth and nutrition data and met criteria for the original study's "efficacy analysis" (eg, >80% of kilocalorie intake from study diet). Nutritional intake was estimated, not actual. Regressions were used to test cumulative kilocalories and protein as the predictors of 28-day change in weight and length z scores (growth status), and to evaluate protein tolerance. RESULTS: Average intake was 118 ± 8 kcal · kg(-1) · day(-1) and 4.3 ± 0.4 g protein · kg(-1) · day(-1), with 16 ± 3 g · kg(-1) · day(-1) and 1.1 ± 0.2 cm/week growth for 28 days. Cumulative total kilocalories and protein were significant predictors of improved length z score (P = 0.0054, 0.0005) but not weight z score change. Regression models indicated that protein not kilocalories explained the improvement in length z score, with protein explaining 19% of the variability. The high protein group averaged 4.6 to 5.5 g · kg(-1) · day(-1) (n = 16). Protein tolerance was adequate for all of the study infants based on metabolic measures (blood urea nitrogen, serum carbon dioxide, pH). CONCLUSIONS: Higher cumulative protein intake was tolerated and overall lessened the commonly occurring decline in the length but not weight growth status in a 28-day study of preterm infants.

Toddler formula supplemented with docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) improves DHA status and respiratory health in a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of US children less than 3 years of age.

Studies of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) intake and status in US toddlers are lacking. One national survey found low DHA intakes. The objectives of this double-blind, randomized study were to (a) determine usual DHA intakes, (b) measure the effect of consuming formulas with DHA on red blood cell (RBC) and plasma DHA and (c) record adverse events in US children between 18 and 36 months of age. Children aged 18-36 months were provided 237-ml formula with 0, 43, or 130 mg DHA per day for 60 days. Blood was obtained at 0 and 60 days and 24-hour dietary recalls at 0, 30 and 60 days. Usual median daily DHA intake was 13.3 mg. RBC DHA increased in a dose-dependent manner with increasing DHA intake (p<0.05). Toddlers consuming the formula with 130 mg DHA per day have fewer adverse events (p=0.007) and a lower incidence of respiratory illness (p=0.024), compared to the formula without DHA. US toddlers have low DHA intake and status. Modest increases in DHA intake in toddlers might improve development, including respiratory health.