Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob ; 23(1): 16, 2024 Feb 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38360651

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Guidelines about febrile neutropenia in paediatric patients are not homogeneous; the best empiric treatment of this condition should be driven by local epidemiology. The Weighted-Incidence Syndromic Combination Antibiogram (WISCA) addresses the need for disease-specific local susceptibility evidence that could guide empiric antibiotic prescriptions based on outcome estimates of treatment regimens obtained as a weighted average of pathogen susceptibilities. This study developed a WISCA model to inform empirical antibiotic regimen selection for febrile neutropenia (FN) episodes in onco-haematological paediatric patients treated at two Italian paediatric tertiary centres. METHODS: We included blood cultures from patients with a bloodstream infection and neutropenia admitted to the Paediatric Haematology-Oncology wards in Padua and Genoa Hospitals from 2016 to 2021. WISCAs were developed by estimating the coverage of 20 antibiotics as monotherapy and of 21 combined regimens with a Bayesian probability distribution. RESULTS: We collected 350 blood cultures, including 196 g-negative and 154 g-positive bacteria. Considering the most used antibiotic combinations, such as piperacillin-tazobactam plus amikacin, the median coverage for the pool of bacteria collected in the study was 78%. When adding a glycopeptide, the median coverage increased to 89%, while the replacement of piperacillin-tazobactam with meropenem did not provide benefits. The developed WISCAs showed that no monotherapy offered an adequate coverage rate for the identified pathogens. CONCLUSIONS: The application of WISCA offers the possibility of maximizing the clinical utility of microbiological surveillance data derived from large hospitals to inform the choice of the best empiric treatment while contributing to spare broad-spectrum antibiotics.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Neutropenia Febril , Humanos , Niño , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Incidencia , Teorema de Bayes , Hospitales Pediátricos , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Bacterias , Italia , Neutropenia Febril/tratamiento farmacológico
2.
Int J Paediatr Dent ; 33(3): 269-277, 2023 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36692188

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Oral mucositis (OM) is one of the most debilitating side effects of chemotherapy. Among the current methods used in OM management, the feasibility of high power laser therapy (HPLT) has been proposed but not fully evaluated. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of HPLT in the treatment of OM in paediatric patients. DESIGN: Fourteen oncohematological paediatric patients treated with chemotherapy and/or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and affected by OM at different grades were enrolled in this study. All patients were treated with a class IV laser device in four sessions for four consecutive days, OM was evaluated with the WHO-OTS scale. The perception of pain was assessed by the visual analog scale. Photographs of and information about lesions and patient questionnaires were taken and collected, respectively. Descriptive analyses and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (nonparametric test) were used, with a statistical significance of α = .05. RESULTS: After a week into the treatment, 57% of patients were completely healed, whereas the whole cohort experienced a drastic decrease in pain, from an average value of 5.8-1.1 (p = .0016). The average number of injuries per patient decreased from 7.4 to 3.1 (p = .008). CONCLUSION: High power laser therapy appears to be a safe and efficacious method for managing OM. It reduces pain and severity of oral cavity injuries. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal parameters useful in OM treatment and to evaluate the relative effectiveness of HPLT to other treatments like LLLT.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Terapia por Láser , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad , Estomatitis , Humanos , Niño , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad/métodos , Terapia por Láser/métodos , Estomatitis/inducido químicamente , Estomatitis/terapia , Dolor , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos
3.
Front Psychol ; 13: 860729, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35651574

RESUMEN

The majority of the studies underlined how adolescent and young adult (AYA) Cancer Survivors had no significant differences in their well-being and quality of life compared with a control group of healthy counterparts, although French et al. (2013) found less years of education among cancer survivors. The present study aimed at comparing AYA cancer survivors and a control group of peers who had no history of serious illness, in terms of well-being, cognitive functioning, and perceptions of life. Participants in this study were 205 AYA cancer survivors, 126 males, off therapy from a mean of 10.87 years (SD = 4.91), with a mean age of 18.96 (SD = 3.08), recruited during follow-up visits and healthy counterparts (n = 205), matched for age and gender. They all completed self-report questionnaires: Ladder of Life, BSI-18 and Cognitive problems. Paired t test evidenced significant differences between survivors (Mean = 6.19; SD = 2.07) and controls (Mean = 6.88; SD = 2.02) in perceptions of quality of life regarding 5 years before the current time [t (204) = -3.39; p = 0.001], with a lower level for childhood cancer survivors. Specifically, Hierarchical regression (R 2 = 0.05, p = 0.04) identified a shorter time since the completion of treatment (ß = 0.18, p = 0.03) and a trend of stem cell transplantation experience (ß = -0.11, p = 0.06) as factors associated with negative perception of precedent quality of life. The AYA cancer survivors reported lower cognitive difficulties (Mean = 1.46) than controls (Mean = 1.56) [t (204) = -3.41; p = 0.001]: in memory (Meanclinical = 1.32 vs Meancontrol = 1.50) [t (204) = -4.52; p = 0.001], in concentration (Mean clinical = 1.36 vs Meancontrol = 1.54) [t (204) = -4.66; p = 0.001] and in mental organization skills (Mean clinical = 1.47 vs Meancontrol = 1.56) [t (204) = -2.56; p = 0.01], even if they had a lower educational attainment [X ( 9 ) 2 = 131.28; p = 0.001]. They showed similar satisfaction with their psychological well-being and their lives as healthy counterparts, except for past life perceptions associated with the cancer period. Important recommendations for future research and clinical suggestions could be given.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA