Questions and Controversies in the Clinical Application of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors to Treat Patients with Radioiodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: Expert Perspectives.

Notwithstanding regulatory approval of lenvatinib and sorafenib to treat radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid carcinoma (RAI-R DTC), important questions and controversies persist regarding this use of these tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). RAI-R DTC experts from German tertiary referral centers convened to identify and explore such issues; this paper summarizes their discussions. One challenge is determining when to start TKI therapy. Decision-making should be shared between patients and multidisciplinary caregivers, and should consider tumor size/burden, growth rate, and site(s), the key drivers of RAI-R DTC morbidity and mortality, along with current and projected tumor-related symptomatology, co-morbidities, and performance status. Another question involves choice of first-line TKIs. Currently, lenvatinib is generally preferred, due to greater increase in progression-free survival versus placebo treatment and higher response rate in its pivotal trial versus that of sorafenib; additionally, in those studies, lenvatinib but not sorafenib showed overall survival benefit in subgroup analysis. Whether recommended maximum or lower TKI starting doses better balance anti-tumor effects versus tolerability is also unresolved. Exploratory analyses of lenvatinib pivotal study data suggest dose-response effects, possibly favoring higher dosing; however, results are awaited of a prospective comparison of lenvatinib starting regimens. Some controversy surrounds determination of net therapeutic benefit, the key criterion for continuing TKI therapy: if tolerability is acceptable, overall disease control may justify further treatment despite limited but manageable progression. Future research should assess potential guideposts for starting TKIs; fine-tune dosing strategies and further characterize antitumor efficacy; and evaluate interventions to prevent and/or treat TKI toxicity, particularly palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia and fatigue.

Initial [18F]FDG PET/CT in high-risk DTC patients. A three-year follow-up.

UNLABELLED: In a previous paper, we published the impact of initial [18F]FDG PET/CT (FDG-PET/CT) in high-risk patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) and described the changes in therapy management. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of the initial FDG-PET/CT on a patient's follow-up over three years and the rate of complete remission. PATIENTS, METHODS: This study included 109 DTC patients who underwent radioiodine treatment (RIT), including post-therapeutic whole-body scintigraphy with FDG-PET/CT and a follow-up over three years. The follow-up included high-resolution sonography of the neck and determination of serum Tg as well as Tg antibodies every six months. The results of initial FDG-PET/CT and whole-body scintigraphy were compared with the status after three years of follow-up. RESULTS: 24/109 patients (22%) presented FDG-positive lesions, 22/109 patients (20%) only iodine-positive lesions, and 63/109 patients (58%) neither FDG-positive nor iodine-positive lesions. After three years, 83/109 patients (76%) revealed full remission, 15/109 patients (14%) tumour persistence and 11/109 patients (10%) a progressive disease. The negative predictive value (NPV) was calculated for patients without FDG-positive lesions (NPV 85%) and patients without any lesions (NPV 91%) regarding full remission in the follow-up. CONCLUSION: FDG-PET/CT has a high NPV (85% to 91%) in DTC patients regarding recurrence-free follow-up after three years. The change in patient management in patients with iodine-negative lesions can lead to a higher rate of full remissions in the follow-up after additional surgery. Therefore, FDG-PET/CT should be performed in all high-risk DTC patients in the context of the first RIT to improve patient management and risk stratification.