[Neurological or interdisciplinary outpatient pain treatment: comparison of treatment success and satisfaction]. / Neurologische oder interdisziplinäre Schmerzambulanz: Vergleich des Behandlungserfolges und der Zufriedenheit.

The aim of this study was to compare the satisfaction and success of treatment for pain patients who were interdisciplinary (anaesthesiological, psychosomatic, neurological, orthopedic) treated or underwent neurological care alone. Methods We selected 183 patients who were treated in our neurological clinic and in our interdisciplinary pain management center (IST). Of these, 142 patients having polyneuropathy, headache or muskuloskelettal pain were included in the final analysis. 39 patients (27.5 %) were treated in the IST and 103 patients were treated exclusively by a neurologist. These patients were asked to complete a questionnaire, and were queried about the satisfaction and pain parameters. Results The neurological and multidisciplinary pain treatment led to a similar improvement in pain (p < 0.001). This effect was independent of the underlying disease. The interdisciplinary outpatient treatment resulted not primarily in an increased patient satisfaction. Conclusions The reduction of pain and patient satisfaction of neurological outpatient pain treatment were comparable with those of a multidisciplinary outpatient therapy. The only significant advantage of the interdisciplinary treatment was lower hospitalization rate after therapy. This result cannot evaluate the efficiency of inpatient or day hospital pain management, but suggests that in many cases a neurological outpatient pain therapy is sufficient, so that neurological outpatient care should be promoted.

Active pain coping is associated with the response in real-time fMRI neurofeedback during pain.

Real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (rt-fMRI) neurofeedback is used as a tool to gain voluntary control of activity in various brain regions. Little emphasis has been put on the influence of cognitive and personality traits on neurofeedback efficacy and baseline activity. Here, we assessed the effect of individual pain coping on rt-fMRI neurofeedback during heat-induced pain. Twenty-eight healthy subjects completed the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ) prior to scanning. The first part of the fMRI experiment identified target regions using painful heat stimulation. Then, subjects were asked to down-regulate the pain target brain region during four neurofeedback runs with painful heat stimulation. Functional MRI analysis included correlation analysis between fMRI activation and pain ratings as well as CSQ ratings. At the behavioral level, the active pain coping (first principal component of CSQ) was correlated with pain ratings during neurofeedback. Concerning neuroimaging, pain sensitive regions were negatively correlated with pain coping. During neurofeedback, the pain coping was positively correlated with activation in the anterior cingulate cortex, prefrontal cortex, hippocampus and visual cortex. Thermode temperature was negatively correlated with anterior insula and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activation. In conclusion, self-reported pain coping mechanisms and pain sensitivity are a source of variance during rt-fMRI neurofeedback possibly explaining variations in regulation success. In particular, active coping seems to be associated with successful pain regulation.

Complex regional pain syndrome: An optimistic perspective.

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) presents with clinical symptoms that can no longer be explained by the initial trauma, including pain, sensory, motor, and trophic symptoms, and impairment of autonomic control of the limb. These symptoms spread distally and go beyond single nerve innervation territories. Typically, the symptoms change through the course of CRPS as a result of the varying pathophysiology. Diagnosis is made clinically after the rigorous elimination of other possible causes, and 3-phase bone scintigraphy can be a useful tool for confirming CRPS. In acute stages, inflammatory symptoms prevail and should be treated with anti-inflammatory agents (steroids), bisphosphonates, or topical application of dimethyl sulfoxide. In chronic stages, many symptoms are related to so-called central neuroplasticity; these include hyperalgesia, sensory loss, motor symptoms, body perception disturbance, autonomic symptoms, and learned incorrect behavior such as nonuse. At this stage, the only medical treatment that is effective against pain without improving the function is ketamine infusions, but this has side effects. Physical therapy, graded motor imagery, and pain exposure/graded exposure in vivo therapy can help to overcome central reorganization. If a relevant mental comorbidity is present, the patient should be referred for psychotherapeutic treatment. Invasive treatment should be restricted to special cases and only offered after psychosomatic assessment. If these recommendations are followed, CRPS prognosis is not as poor as commonly assumed. Whether the patients can return to their previous life depends on particular individual factors.

Phantom limb pain in daily practice--still a lot of work to do!

OBJECTIVES: Effective treatment of phantom limb pain (PLP, pain felt in the part of the body of an amputated limb) is still difficult to achieve, and improved treatment is needed. It is therefore of paramount interest to understand the current practice of PLP therapy outside pain centers. DESIGN: As a part of a nationwide survey, 537 amputees were asked 11 questions related to their treatment experiences and the pain relief. Furthermore, the patients' opinion about the quality of medical care was also asked. RESULTS: Five hundred thirty-seven out of 1088 amputees returned the questionnaire (49.4%). Four hundred (74.5%) suffered from PLP. The patients rated their caregivers' knowledge about PLP lower than their own. Many (41.6%) of PLP patients had never been informed about the possibility of occurrence and mechanisms of PLP. The vast majority of the PLP patients did not try any treatment. Among those treated, more than 30% consulted more than three physicians for beneficial treatment. A >50% pain reduction was achieved in only 12.7% of PLP patients. The most successful treatments were opioids (67.4%) and anticonvulsants (51.7%). Surgery was performed in 46.4% of all PLP patients and in 29.7% due to a clinically suspected neuroma. After surgery, pain was worse or unchanged in 50% and improved in 41.6%, and 7.4% were pain-free. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that there are primary needs for better information about PLP pathophysiology and treatment not only for patients but also for caregivers. Limited therapeutic success reveals a further need for increased research in PLP management.

The efficacy of acupuncture in human pain models: a randomized, controlled, double-blinded study.

Acupuncture is frequently used to treat pain, although data supporting the analgesic efficacy from placebo-controlled studies is sparse. In order to get evidence for acupuncture analgesia we performed a study with 2 well-recognized experimental human pain models - the cold-pressor (CP) test and intradermal capsaicin injection. Fifty healthy men were included. Our study compared Traditional Chinese Medicine-based acupuncture to sham acupuncture with Streitberger placebo needles in a randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial. The primary endpoint was the reduction of mean pain intensity during 3minutes of CP test or of mean pain intensity within 10minutes after capsaicin injection. Secondary parameters were defined to substantiate the findings. To ensure comparability, somatosensory (measured by quantitative sensory testing) and psychological parameters were investigated and found to be the same in both groups. Analyses (repeated-measures analyses of variance) showed a significant (P=0.009) but clinically questionable pain reduction in the verum group for capsaicin-induced pain, which was mainly driven by an effect of Traditional Chinese Medicine acupuncture on small pain ratings (max. reduction from 7/100 rating at baseline to 2.5/100 at intervention). Neither pin-prick hyperalgesia, nor allodynia, nor neurogenic flare associated with capsaicin injection, nor pain ratings during the CP test, were significantly different between groups. In addition, there was no placebo response. Attitude towards acupuncture and partial unblinding did not affect the results. We conclude that acupuncture on predefined points has a minor effect on experimental pain in healthy subjects.

Thinking about movement hurts: the effect of motor imagery on pain and swelling in people with chronic arm pain.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic painful disease is associated with pain on movement, which is presumed to be caused by noxious stimulation. We investigated whether motor imagery, in the absence of movement, increases symptoms in patients with chronic arm pain. METHODS: Thirty-seven subjects performed a motor imagery task. Pain and swelling were measured before, after, and 60 minutes after the task. Electromyography findings verified no muscle activity. Patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) were compared with those with non-CRPS pain. Secondary variables from clinical, psychophysical, and cognitive domains were related to change in symptoms using linear regression. RESULTS: Motor imagery increased pain and swelling. For CRPS patients, pain (measured on a 100-mm visual analog scale) increased by a mean +/- SD of 5.3 +/- 3.9 mm and swelling by 8% +/- 5%. For non-CRPS patients, pain increased by 1.4 +/- 4.1 mm and swelling by 3% +/- 4%. There were no differences between groups (P > 0.19 for both). Increased pain and swelling related positively to duration of symptoms and performance on a left/right judgment task that interrogated the body schema, autonomic response, catastrophic thoughts about pain, and fear of movement (r > 0.42, P < 0.03 for all). CONCLUSION: Motor imagery increased pain and swelling in patients with chronic painful disease of the arm. The effect increased in line with the duration of symptoms and seems to be modulated by autonomic arousal and beliefs about pain and movement. The results highlight the contribution of cortical mechanisms to pain on movement, which has implications for treatment.

Vagus nerve stimulation suppresses pain but has limited effects on neurogenic inflammation in humans.

Left vagus nerve stimulation reduces pain perception in humans. In animal studies it has been shown that beyond the inhibitory effect, which the vagus nerve exerts via its widespread central connections, there might be also a peripheral effect on nociceptors. In humans, the exact mechanisms of VNS-mediated analgesia are still unclear. To test whether VNS also affects activation of primary nociceptive afferents in humans, we investigated 11 patients before and after implantation of a vagus nerve stimulator by using tonic pressure as pain stimulus. Vasodilator axon reflexes ("neurogenic" inflammation) were quantified by laser-Doppler-imaging and served as surrogates for primary afferent activation. Pain was measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS). The squeezing experiment was performed three times at 15 min intervals in each session. As controls 9 healthy age- and gender-matched subjects were studied. As shown in our previous study, VNS significantly reduces pain to tonic pressure. Likewise, there was a moderate reduction of the blood flow within the area of the axon reflex, which indicates a possible but limited inhibitory effect of VNS on peripheral nociceptors. Our data suggests that VNS might affect peripheral nociceptor function in humans. Since VNS has been shown to be more effective in experimental procedures in which pain magnitude is amplified by central processing, further studies are warranted to elucidate whether the central or peripheral effect is most important for VNS-mediated analgesia.