PQ segment depression in patients with short QT syndrome: a novel marker for diagnosing short QT syndrome?

BACKGROUND: Patients with short QT syndrome (SQTS) have an increased risk for atrial tachyarrhythmias, ventricular tachyarrhythmias, and/or sudden cardiac death. PQ segment depression (PQD) is related to atrial fibrillation and carries a poor prognosis in the setting of acute inferior myocardial infarction and is a well-defined electrocardiographic (ECG) marker of acute pericarditis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of PQD in SQTS and to analyze the association with atrial arrhythmias. METHODS: Digitalized 12-lead ECGs of SQTS patients were evaluated for PQD in all leads and for QT intervals in leads II and V5. PQD was defined as ≥0.05 mV (0.5 mm) depression from the isoelectric line. RESULTS: A total of 760 leads from 64 SQTS patients (mean age 36 ± 18 years; 48 [75%] men) were analyzed. PQD was seen in 265 (35%) leads from 52 (81%) patients and was more frequent in leads II, V3, aVF, V4, and I (n = 43 [67%], n = 30 [47%], n = 27 [42%], n = 25 [39%], and n = 25 [39%], respectively). Nine of 64 (14%) patients presented with atrial tachyarrhythmias, and all of them had PQD. CONCLUSION: Fifty-two of 64 (81%) patients with SQTS reveal PQD. As PQD is rarely observed in healthy individuals, this ECG stigma may constitute a novel marker for SQTS in addition to a short QT interval.

Defibrillation testing in everyday medical practice during implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation in France: analysis from the LEADER registry.

BACKGROUND: Defibrillation testing (DT) is usually performed during implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation. AIMS: We conducted a multicentre prospective study to determine the DT procedures used in everyday practice, to compare the characteristics of patients with or without DT, and to compare severe adverse events in these two populations during implantation and follow-up. METHODS: The LEADER registry enrolled 904 patients included for primo-implantation of a single (n=261), dual (n=230) or triple (n=429) defibrillation system in 42 French centres. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of patients (62.0 ± 13.5 years; 88% men; primary indication 62%) who underwent ventricular fibrillation (VF) induction (VF induction group, n=810) and those who did not (untested group, n=94, representing 10.4% of the entire study population) revealed that the untested group were older (P<0.01), had a lower left ventricular ejection fraction, a wider QRS complex and a higher New York Heart Association class and were more often implanted for primary prevention (P<0.001 for all). The main reason given for not performing ICD testing was poor haemodynamic condition (59/94). At 1 year, the cumulative survival rate was 95% in tested patients and 85% in untested patients (P<0.001), mainly because of heart failure deaths. There was one sudden cardiac death in the VF induction group and none in the untested group (P=1.000). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, more than 10% of ICD patients were implanted without VF induction. Untested patients appeared to be sicker than tested patients, with a more severe long-term outcome, but without any difference in mortality due to arrhythmic events.

Clinical laboratory testing: what is the role of tilt-table testing, active standing test, carotid massage, electrophysiological testing and ATP test in the syncope evaluation?

The first step in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with suspected syncope begins with an "initial evaluation" consisting of careful history taking, physical examination including orthostatic blood pressure measurement and electrocardiogram. However, even in expert centers the diagnostic yield of this "initial evaluation" is only approximately 50%. In the remaining cases in which a satisfactory diagnosis is either unknown or uncertain after initial assessment, additional clinical testing is needed. This article reviews the role of some of the more commonly used additional diagnostic tests, including: tilt-table testing, the active standing test, carotid sinus massage, electrophysiological testing, and the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) test. The role of angiography, exercise testing and imaging is noted briefly. Other clinical laboratory investigations, such as ambulatory ECG monitoring, are examined in other papers in this issue. In brief, clinical laboratory tests, carefully interpreted, may be useful in the evaluation of the basis of suspected syncope. However, these tests should be selected carefully and performed based on the pre-test probability inferred from the initial examination, and the less invasive tests should be used first.