Novel Assessment of Accessory Pathway Function in Patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome.

Surrogates for the shortest pre-excited R-R interval in atrial fibrillation (SPERRI) such as the accessory pathway effective refractory period (APERP) and shortest pre-excited paced cycle length (SPPCL) are flawed assessments of accessory pathway function in patients with WPW. Multi-extrastimulus pacing may have the theoretical advantage of more accurately mimicking the clinical reality of atrial fibrillation and thus may serve to better assess accessory pathway function. This cross-sectional study included 25 consecutive patients, aged ≤ 18 years, undergoing electrophysiology study for WPW. The longest S1S2, S2S3, S3S4 coupling intervals at which the antegrade AP refractoriness occurred, SPERRI, and SPPCL were recorded. Induction of atrial fibrillation was attempted in all patients and induced in 8 (32%, 4 SPERRIbaseline (265 ms ± 61 ms), 4 SPERRIIsuprel (258 ms ± 41 ms)). At baseline, the lower value of the S3ERP or S4ERP (274 ms ± 52 ms) was lower than the SPPCL (296 ms ± 54 ms, p < 0.0001) and APERP (296 ms ± 41 ms, p < 0.0001). More patients had S3ERP or S4ERP ≤ 250 ms (12/25, 48%) compared to those with APERP ≤ 250 ms (2/25 8%), p = 0.0016), SPPCL 5/24, 20%), p = 0.008 or either (6/25, 24%), p = 0.0143). With Isuprel, the lower value of the S3ERP or S4ERP (221 ms ± 36 ms) trended to be lower than the APERP (252 ms ± 36 ms, p = 0.0001) and the SPPCL (266 ms ± 57 ms, p = 0.001). With Isuprel, there was no statistical difference in the proportion of patients with S3ERP or S4ERP < 250 ms (12/16, 75%) compared to those with APERP ≤ 250 ms ((9/16, 56%), p = 0.08), SPPCL ≤ 250 ms ((9/16, 56%), p = 0.08), or either ((10/16, 63%), p = 0.16). Multi-extrastimulus pacing protocols demonstrate that accessory pathways are less refractory than as defined by single extrastimulus pacing and straight decremental pacing.

Difficulties with invasive risk stratification performed under anesthesia in pediatric Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Children with Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome (WPW) are at risk for sudden death. The gold standard for risk stratification in this population is the shortest pre-excited RR interval during atrial fibrillation (SPERRI). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine how closely measurements made in the electrophysiology laboratory in patients with WPW compared to SPERRI obtained during an episode of clinical pre-excited atrial fibrillation (Clinical-SPERRI). METHODS: This was a subgroup analysis of a multicenter study of children with WPW. Subjects in our study (N = 49) were included if they had Clinical-SPERRI measured in addition to 1 or more of 3 surrogate measurements: SPERRI obtained during electrophysiological study (EP-SPERRI), accessory pathway effective refractory period (APERP), or shortest pre-excited paced cycle length with 1:1 conduction (SPPCL). RESULTS: Seventy percent of electrophysiological measurements were made with patients under general anesthesia. Clinical-SPERRI moderately correlated with EP-SPERRI (r = 0.495; P = .012). However, 24% of our patients with Clinical-SPERRI ≤250 ms would have been misclassified as having a low-risk pathway based on EP-SPERRI >250 ms. Clinical-SPERRI did not correlate with APERP or SPPCL (r < 0.3; P >.1). Mean EP-SPERRI, APERP, and SPPCL all were greater than Clinical-SPERRI. CONCLUSION: Electrophysiology laboratory measurements of pathway characteristics made with patients under general anesthesia do not correlate well with Clinical-SPERRI. Of APERP, SPPCL, and EP-SPERRI, only EP-SPERRI had moderate correlation with Clinical-SPERRI. This study questions the predictive ability of invasive risk stratification with patients under general anesthesia, given that 24% of patients with high-risk Clinical-SPERRI (≤250 ms) had EP-SPERRI that may be considered low risk (>250 ms).

A multicenter review of ablation in the aortic cusps in young people.

BACKGROUND: Ablation within the aortic cusp is safe and effective in adults. There are little data on aortic cusp ablation in the pediatric literature. We investigated the safety and efficacy of aortic cusp ablation in young patients. METHODS: A retrospective, descriptive study of aortic cusp ablation in five pediatric electrophysiology centers from 2008 to 2014 was performed. All patients <21 years of age who underwent ablation in the aortic cusps were included. Factors analyzed included patient demographics, procedural details, outcomes, and complications. RESULTS: Thirteen patients met inclusion criteria (median age 16 years [range 10-20.5] and median body surface area 1.58 m2 [range 1.12-2.33]). Substrates for ablation included: nine premature ventricular contractions or sustained ventricular tachycardia (69%), two concealed anteroseptal accessory pathways (APs) (15%), one Wolff-Parkinson-White with an anteroseptal AP (8%), and one ectopic atrial tachycardia (8%). Three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping in combination with fluoroscopy was used in 12/13 (92%) patients. Standard 4-mm-tip radiofrequency (RF) current was used in 11/13 (85%) and low-power irrigated-tip RF in 2/13 (15%). Angiography was used in 13/13 and intracardiac echocardiography was additionally utilized in 3/13 (23%). Ablation locations included: eight noncoronary (62%), three left (23%), and two right (15%) cusps. Ablation was acutely successful in all patients. At median follow-up of 20 months, there was one recurrence of PVCs (8%). There were no ablation-related complications and no valvular injuries observed. CONCLUSION: Arrhythmias originating from the coronary cusps in this series were successfully and safely ablated in young people without injury to the coronary arteries or the aortic valve.

Transesophageal evaluation of asymptomatic Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Risk stratification for Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) by intracardiac electrophysiology study (ICEPS) carries risks related to catheterization. We describe an alternative approach by using transesophageal electrophysiology study (TEEPS). METHODS: The pediatric electrophysiology database was reviewed for patients with WPW and no documented clinical supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) who underwent risk stratification by TEEPS from October 2005 to November 2010. Of those who underwent subsequent ICEPS, only those with data available to compare accessory pathway (AP) conduction during ICEPS and TEEPS were included. RESULTS: Of 65 patients who underwent TEEPS, 42 were found to have an indication for ablation. The most common indication for ICEPS was inducible SVT, which was induced in 67% of patients. Of 42 patients who underwent subsequent ICEPS, 23 had sufficient data for comparison of AP conduction between ICEPS and TEEPS. There was no difference between the baseline minimum 1:1 antegrade conduction through the accessory pathway found at TEEPS versus ICEPS (312 ± 51 ms vs 316 ± 66 ms, P = 0.5). There was no significant difference between the baseline antegrade AP-effective refractory period found at TEEPS versus ICEPS (308 ± 34 ms vs 297 ± 37 ms, P = 0.07). There were no complications related to TEEPS or ICEPS. CONCLUSION: TEEPS is a safe and feasible alternative to ICEPS for risk stratification in patients with asymptomatic WPW and should be considered before ICEPS and ablation.

Transesophageal electrophysiological evaluation of children with a history of supraventricular tachycardia in infancy.

Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) presenting in the neonatal period may resolve by 1 year of age. Predicting which patients require therapy beyond 1 year of age is desirable. Pediatric electrophysiology databases from two institutions were reviewed for patients with a history of infant SVT who underwent transesophageal electrophysiology study (TEEPS) after initial SVT and before 2 years of age. All patients were tested off medications and followed for clinical recurrence. Forty-two patients presented with SVT at median age of 4 days (0-300 days). Initial control was achieved with one drug in 31 patients and multiple drugs in 11 patients. Prior to TEEPS, nine patients had clinical recurrence in the first year of life after initial control had been previously achieved. For all patients, TEEPS was performed, without complications, at median 13 months (9-22 months) of age and at median of 13 months (6-22 months) following the initial SVT episode. SVT was inducible in 27/42: 8 atrio-ventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) and 19 atrio-ventricular reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT). Inducibility was not associated with age at presentation, age at TEEPS, ventricular dysfunction at presentation, presence of structural congenital heart disease, number of drugs required to initially control SVT, or SVT recurrence after initial control. Of 15 not inducible at TEEPS, none had known SVT recurrence off medications at median follow-up of 27 months (6-37 months). In conclusion, among patients having SVT in early infancy, (1) TEEPS results are not associated with clinical variables, (2) non-inducibility is a good indicator of lack of clinical recurrence at intermediate follow-up, and (3) AVNRT may be more prevalent in infancy than previously reported.

Catheter tip cooling during radiofrequency ablation of intra-atrial reentry: effects on power, temperature, and impedance.

INTRODUCTION: Cooling the catheter tip either passively with increased tip size or actively during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) has been shown in canine thigh preparations to create larger lesions than standard catheter tips, yielding a theoretical advantage for improving the outcome of RFCA for intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia (IART). METHODS AND RESULTS: The pediatric RFCA database at the Medical University of South Carolina was reviewed for RFCA of IART in patients with structural heart disease. From a total of 31 patients who underwent procedures during the study period, 8 patients in whom ablation with conventional ablation techniques failed and who went on to passive cooling with an 8-mm tip catheter or active cooling with an internally cooled-tip catheter were studied. Power delivery was greater but temperature and impedance were lower during cooled ablation than during conventional ablation. Passive cooling was associated with higher power than active cooling. These changes in RF biophysical characteristics were associated with successful elimination of 11 of 13 IART circuits in 7 of 8 patients. CONCLUSION: Cooling during RF ablation of atrial tachycardia clearly yielded greater power delivery in vivo and was associated with success.