A "new" option in Helicobacter pylori eradication: High-dose amoxicillin dual therapy outperforms bismuth quadruple therapy in a high dual resistance setting.

BACKGROUND: Currently, bismuth quadruple therapy (BQT) is indicated as a first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori eradication in areas with high dual metronidazole and clarithromycin resistance, with its use being limited by its low tolerability and significant cost. A novel regimen with high-dose amoxicillin dual therapy (HDADT) has emerged as an alternative. The aim of this study was to compare the results of these two treatments on HP eradication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective randomized study including 100 consecutive patients undergoing H. pylori eradication. Each patient was randomized (in a 1:1 ratio) to one group of treatment: BQT (bismuth 140 mg + metronidazole 125 mg + tetracycline 125 mg, four times a day, for 10 days) or HDADT (amoxicillin 1000 mg alternating with amoxicillin 500 mg, four times a day, for 14 days), both associated with esomeprazole 40 mg twice a day. The primary aim was to compare treatments' efficacies. Secondary aims were to assess symptoms persistence and tolerability. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were included, 54% women, with a mean age of 55 ± 14 years. From these, five were lost to follow-up. Effective eradication proven by negative stool antigen test was significantly higher in patients randomized to HDADT when compared to BQT for both intention-to-treat (ITT) (96.2% vs. 81.4%; p = .022) and per-protocol (PP) (95.9% vs. 81%; p = .025) analysis. These differences were even more pronounced when only considering second line treatment (100% vs. 62.5%; p = .028). Side effects did not differ significantly between BQT and HDADT groups for both ITT (7.0% vs. 2.0%; p = .254) and PP (4.8% vs. 0%; p = .210) analysis. CONCLUSIONS: When compared to BQT, treatment with HDADT presented higher and near 100% efficacy in eradicating H. pylori, without differences in reported side effects or compliance. This treatment represents an important alternative for populations with increasing incidences of resistance to the currently recommended antibiotic regimens.

How should we select suspected Crohn's disease patients for capsule enteroscopy?

Background: In suspected Crohn's disease (CD), non-diagnostic ileocolonoscopies are often followed by small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE). Adequate pre-selection of patients for SBCE is a key to optimize allocation of resources. We aimed to establish a rational approach for the CD diagnostic workflow, based on biochemical profile of patients with suspected CD, targeting an optimization of patients' selection for SBCE. Methods: Multicenter cohort study includes consecutive patients with suspected undergoing SBCE after non-diagnostic ileocolonoscopy. Minimum follow-up period after the capsule enteroscopy was six months. The outcome was confirmation of CD diagnosis. Univariate analysis and logistic regression were performed. Results: In included 220 patients, 62.3% of women were with a mean age of 41 years [26-54]. A confirmed diagnosis of CD was established in 98 patients (44.5%). The initial univariate analysis identified variables above the threshold of marginal statistical association toward CD diagnosis (p < .15). The regression model identified high CRP levels (OR 1.028 p = .128) and low serum Iron (OR 0.990 p = .025) as the independent variables with consistent correlation with CD diagnosis. Those two variables present a suitable discriminative power (AUC = 0.669, p < .001) for the diagnosis of CD. Conclusion: In suspected CD, low serum iron and elevated CRP had a statistically significant association with CD diagnosis, being helpful to identify patients with higher CD probability before SBCE. However, the lack of a proper validation of the model leads us to currently recommend SBCE to all patients with suspected CD and negative ileocolonoscopy, as no specific biochemical profile can be used to confidently exclude small bowel CD.