Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 18 de 18
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Osteoporos Int ; 25(11): 2507-29, 2014 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25023900

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: This consensus article reviews the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in geriatric populations. Specifically, it reviews the risk assessment and intervention thresholds, the impact of nutritional deficiencies, fall prevention strategies, pharmacological treatments and their safety considerations, the risks of sub-optimal treatment adherence and strategies for its improvement. INTRODUCTION: This consensus article reviews the therapeutic strategies and management options for the treatment of osteoporosis of the oldest old. This vulnerable segment (persons over 80 years of age) stands to gain substantially from effective anti-osteoporosis treatment, but the under-prescription of these treatments is frequent. METHODS: This report is the result of an ESCEO (European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis) expert working group, which explores some of the reasons for this and presents the arguments to counter these beliefs. The risk assessment of older individuals is briefly reviewed along with the differences between some intervention guidelines. The current evidence on the impact of nutritional deficiencies (i.e. calcium, protein and vitamin D) is presented, as are strategies to prevent falls. One possible reason for the under-prescription of pharmacological treatments for osteoporosis in the oldest old is the perception that anti-fracture efficacy requires long-term treatment. However, a review of the data shows convincing anti-fracture efficacy already by 12 months. RESULTS: The safety profiles of these pharmacological agents are generally satisfactory in this patient segment provided a few precautions are followed. CONCLUSION: These patients should be considered for particular consultation/follow-up procedures in the effort to convince on the benefits of treatment and to allay fears of adverse drug reactions, since poor adherence is a major problem for the success of a strategy for osteoporosis and limits cost-effectiveness.


Asunto(s)
Osteoporosis/diagnóstico , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Accidentes por Caídas/prevención & control , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Envejecimiento/fisiología , Densidad Ósea/fisiología , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversos , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Suplementos Dietéticos , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/prevención & control , Vitamina D/uso terapéutico
2.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 29(4): 305-13, 2013 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23320612

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Vitamin D insufficiency has deleterious consequences on health outcomes. In elderly or postmenopausal women, it may exacerbate osteoporosis. SCOPE: There is currently no clear consensus on definitions of vitamin D insufficiency or minimal targets for vitamin D concentrations and proposed targets vary with the population. In view of the potential confusion for practitioners on when to treat and what to achieve, the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO) convened a meeting to provide recommendations for clinical practice, to ensure the optimal management of elderly and postmenopausal women with regard to vitamin D supplementation. FINDINGS: Vitamin D has both skeletal and extra-skeletal benefits. Patients with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-(OH)D) levels <50 nmol/L have increased bone turnover, bone loss, and possibly mineralization defects compared with patients with levels >50 nmol/L. Similar relationships have been reported for frailty, nonvertebral and hip fracture, and all-cause mortality, with poorer outcomes at <50 nmol/L. CONCLUSION: The ESCEO recommends that 50 nmol/L (i.e. 20 ng/mL) should be the minimal serum 25-(OH)D concentration at the population level and in patients with osteoporosis to ensure optimal bone health. Below this threshold, supplementation is recommended at 800 to 1000 IU/day. Vitamin D supplementation is safe up to 10,000 IU/day (upper limit of safety) resulting in an upper limit of adequacy of 125 nmol/L 25-(OH)D. Daily consumption of calcium- and vitamin-D-fortified food products (e.g. yoghurt or milk) can help improve vitamin D intake. Above the threshold of 50 nmol/L, there is no clear evidence for additional benefits of supplementation. On the other hand, in fragile elderly subjects who are at elevated risk for falls and fracture, the ESCEO recommends a minimal serum 25-(OH)D level of 75 nmol/L (i.e. 30 ng/mL), for the greatest impact on fracture.


Asunto(s)
Calcio de la Dieta/uso terapéutico , Suplementos Dietéticos/efectos adversos , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/tratamiento farmacológico , Vitamina D/administración & dosificación , Vitamina D/sangre , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Densidad Ósea , Huesos/fisiología , Femenino , Fracturas Óseas/prevención & control , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoartritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Posmenopausia , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/sangre , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/mortalidad
3.
Acta Clin Belg ; 67(1): 13-8, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22480033

RESUMEN

Osteoporosis is a highly prevalent and often undertreated disease in the elderly. Osteoporosis-related fractures are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Anti-osteoporotic drugs are only reimbursed by the Belgian government if strict conditions are fulfilled. The aim of this paper was to create a practical tool to guide the physician and other health care professionals to make an appropriate choice. Two flowcharts, based on Belgian reimbursement criteria and literature review were developed. Both tools provide an overview of the reimbursed pharmacological agents in the management of osteoporosis in male and female subjects.


Asunto(s)
Vías Clínicas , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Osteoporosis/diagnóstico , Osteoporosis/terapia , Mecanismo de Reembolso , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bélgica , Árboles de Decisión , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoporosis/complicaciones
4.
Osteoporos Int ; 23 Suppl 1: S1-23, 2012 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22311111

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: Drugs used for the prevention and the treatment of osteoporosis exert various favourable and unfavourable extra-skeletal effects whose importance is increasingly recognized notably for treatment selection. INTRODUCTION: The therapeutic armamentarium for the prevention and the treatment of osteoporosis is increasingly large, and possible extra-skeletal effects of available drugs could influence the choice of a particular compound. METHODS: The present document is the result of a national consensus, based on a systematic and critical review of the literature. RESULTS: Observational research has suggested an inverse relationship between calcium intake and cardiovascular diseases, notably through an effect on blood pressure, but recent data suggest a possible deleterious effect of calcium supplements on cardiovascular risk. Many diverse studies have implicated vitamin D in the pathogenesis of clinically important non-skeletal functions or diseases, especially muscle function, cardiovascular disease, autoimmune diseases and common cancers. The possible effects of oral or intravenous bisphosphonates are well-known. They have been associated with an increased risk of oesophageal cancer or atrial fibrillation, but large-scale studies have not found any association with bisphosphonate use. Selective oestrogen receptor modulators have demonstrated favourable or unfavourable extra-skeletal effects that vary between compounds. Strontium ranelate has a limited number of non-skeletal effects. A reported increase in the risk of venous thromboembolism is not found in observational studies, and very rare cases of cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions have been reported. Denosumab has been introduced recently, and its extra-skeletal effects still have to be assessed. CONCLUSION: Several non-skeletal effects of bone drugs are well demonstrated and influence treatment choices.


Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Calcio/uso terapéutico , Difosfonatos/uso terapéutico , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Moduladores Selectivos de los Receptores de Estrógeno/uso terapéutico , Vitamina D/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/farmacología , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/farmacología , Calcio/farmacología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/inducido químicamente , Consenso , Denosumab , Suplementos Dietéticos/efectos adversos , Difosfonatos/farmacología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Músculo Esquelético/efectos de los fármacos , Neoplasias/inducido químicamente , Compuestos Organometálicos/farmacología , Moduladores Selectivos de los Receptores de Estrógeno/farmacología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/inducido químicamente , Tiofenos/farmacología , Vitamina D/farmacología
5.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 96(6): 1727-36, 2011 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21411557

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: The FREEDOM (Fracture REduction Evaluation of Denosumab in Osteoporosis every 6 Months) trial showed denosumab significantly reduced the risk of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the effect of denosumab on the incidence of new vertebral and hip fractures in subgroups of women at higher risk for these fractures. DESIGN: FREEDOM was a 3-yr, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Postmenopausal women (N = 7808) with osteoporosis were enrolled at 213 study sites worldwide. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects received s.c. denosumab (60 mg) or placebo every 6 months and daily supplements of calcium (≥1000 mg) and vitamin D (≥400 IU). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: This post hoc analysis evaluated fracture incidence in women with known risk factors for fractures including multiple and/or moderate or severe prevalent vertebral fractures, aged 75 yr or older, and/or femoral neck bone mineral density T-score of -2.5 or less. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, denosumab significantly reduced the risk of new vertebral fractures in women with multiple and/or severe prevalent vertebral fractures (16.6% placebo vs. 7.5% denosumab; P < 0.001). Similarly, denosumab significantly reduced the risk of hip fractures in subjects aged 75 yr or older (2.3% placebo vs. 0.9% denosumab; P < 0.01) or with a baseline femoral neck bone mineral density T-score of -2.5 or less (2.8% placebo vs. 1.4% denosumab; P = 0.02). These risk reductions in higher-risk individuals were consistent with those seen in patients at lower risk of fracture. CONCLUSIONS: Denosumab reduced the incidence of new vertebral and hip fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis at higher risk for fracture. These results highlight the consistent antifracture efficacy of denosumab in patients with varying degrees of fracture risk.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Fracturas de Cadera/epidemiología , Fracturas de Cadera/prevención & control , Ligando RANK/uso terapéutico , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/epidemiología , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/prevención & control , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Denosumab , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Fracturas de Cadera/etiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/complicaciones , Posmenopausia , Riesgo , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Osteoporos Int ; 22(11): 2769-88, 2011 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21360219

RESUMEN

This consensus article reviews the various aspects of the non-pharmacological management of osteoporosis, including the effects of nutriments, physical exercise, lifestyle, fall prevention, and hip protectors. Vertebroplasty is also briefly reviewed. Non-pharmacological management of osteoporosis is a broad concept. It must be viewed as an essential part of the prevention of fractures from childhood through adulthood and the old age. The topic also includes surgical procedures for the treatment of peripheral and vertebral fractures and the post-fracture rehabilitation. The present document is the result of a consensus, based on a systematic review and a critical appraisal of the literature. Diets deficient in calcium, proteins or vitamin D impair skeletal integrity. The effect of other nutriments is less clear, although an excessive consumption of sodium, caffeine, or fibres exerts negative effects on calcium balance. The deleterious effects of tobacco, excessive alcohol consumption and a low BMI are well accepted. Physical activity is of primary importance to reach optimal peak bone mass but, if numerous studies have shown the beneficial effects of various types of exercise on bone mass, fracture data as an endpoint are scanty. Fall prevention strategies are especially efficient in the community setting, but less evidence is available about their effectiveness in preventing fall-related injuries and fractures. The efficacy of hip protectors remains controversial. This is also true for vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Several randomized controlled studies had reported a short-term advantage of vertebroplasty over medical treatment for pain relief, but these findings have been questioned by recent sham-controlled randomized clinical studies.


Asunto(s)
Osteoporosis/terapia , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/prevención & control , Accidentes por Caídas/prevención & control , Factores de Edad , Densidad Ósea , Dieta/estadística & datos numéricos , Suplementos Dietéticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Ejercicio Físico , Terapia por Ejercicio/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Cifoplastia/estadística & datos numéricos , Estilo de Vida , Masculino , Osteoporosis/epidemiología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/epidemiología , Posmenopausia , Equipos de Seguridad/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/prevención & control , Vertebroplastia/estadística & datos numéricos
7.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 24(10): 2841-51, 2008 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18759997

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hip fracture creates a worldwide morbidity, mortality and economic burden. After surgery, many patients experience long-term disability or die as a consequence of the fracture. A fracture is a major risk factor for a subsequent fracture, which may occur within a short interval. METHODS: A literature search on post-fracture management of patients with hip fracture was performed on the Medline database. Key experts convened to develop a consensus document. FINDINGS: Management of hip-fracture patients to optimize outcome after hospital discharge requires several stages of care co-ordinated by a multidisciplinary team from before admission through to discharge. Further studies that specifically assess prevention and post-fracture management of hip fracture are needed, as only one study to date has assessed an osteoporosis medication in patients with a recent hip fracture. Proper nutrition is vital to assist bone repair and prevent further falls, particularly in malnourished patients. Vitamin D, calcium and protein supplementation is associated with an increase in hip BMD and reduction in falls. Rehabilitation is essential to improve functional disabilities and survival rates. Fall prevention and functional recovery strategies should include patient education and training to improve balance and increase muscle strength and mobility. Appropriate management can prevent further fractures and it is critical that high-risk patients are identified and treated. To foster this process, clinical pathways have been established to support orthopaedic surgeons. CONCLUSION: Although hip fracture is generally associated with poor outcomes, appropriate management can ensure optimal recovery and survival, and should be prioritized after a hip fracture to avoid deterioration of health and prevent subsequent fracture.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas de Cadera/mortalidad , Fracturas de Cadera/rehabilitación , Accidentes por Caídas/prevención & control , Densidad Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Calcio/administración & dosificación , Proteínas en la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Desnutrición/mortalidad , Desnutrición/rehabilitación , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Vitamina D/administración & dosificación
8.
Bone ; 42(2): 246-9, 2008 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18055288

RESUMEN

The role of calcium and vitamin D supplementation in the treatment of osteoporosis has been extensively studied. The aim of this paper was to reach, where possible, consensus views on five key questions relating to calcium and vitamin D supplementation in the management of osteoporosis. Whereas global strategies that target supplementation to the general population could not be justified in terms of efficacy and health economics, there is a clearer rationale for supplementing patients who are at increased risk of osteoporosis and those who have developed osteoporosis, including those already taking other treatments for osteoporosis. The combination of vitamin D with calcium may be beneficial in terms of efficacy and, perhaps, for optimising adherence.


Asunto(s)
Calcio/metabolismo , Calcio/uso terapéutico , Osteoporosis/dietoterapia , Vitamina D/uso terapéutico , Animales , Suplementos Dietéticos , Femenino , Humanos , Osteoporosis/epidemiología , Posmenopausia/efectos de los fármacos , Vitamina D/farmacología
10.
J Intern Med ; 259(6): 539-52, 2006 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16704554

RESUMEN

Combined calcium and vitamin D supplementation is an essential component of the management of osteoporosis, supported by a strong scientific rationale. The types of individuals who should receive calcium and vitamin D supplements are those: (i) patients with documented osteoporosis receiving antiresorptive or anabolic treatment; (ii) patients receiving glucocorticoids; and (iii) individuals with or at high risk of calcium and/or vitamin D insufficiencies, in particular older women and men. This article describes the evidence base that supports targeting these groups. Benefits are most apparent when 800 IU day(-1) vitamin D is complemented with a dose of 1000-1200 mg day(-1) elemental calcium. Compliance is also key to optimizing clinical efficacy.


Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Calcio/uso terapéutico , Suplementos Dietéticos , Osteoporosis/prevención & control , Vitamina D/uso terapéutico , Vitaminas/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoporosis/complicaciones , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Selección de Paciente
11.
Calcif Tissue Int ; 78(5): 257-70, 2006 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16622587

RESUMEN

Osteoporotic fractures are an extremely common and serious health problem in the elderly. This article presents the rationale for calcium and vitamin D supplementation in the prevention and treatment of osteoporotic fractures and reviews the literature evidence on the efficacy of this strategy. Two musculoskeletal risk factors are implicated in osteoporotic fractures in the elderly: the loss of bone mass due to secondary hyperparathyroidism and the increased propensity to falls. Calcium and vitamin D reverse secondary hyperparathyroidism with resultant beneficial effects on bone mineral density (BMD). Additionally, calcium and vitamin D supplementation significantly improves body sway and lower extremity strength, reducing the risk of falls. The effects of combined calcium and vitamin D on parathyroid function and BMD provide a strong rationale for the use of this therapy in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. There is general agreement that, in patients with documented osteoporosis, calcium and vitamin D supplementation should be an integral component of the management strategy, along with antiresorptive or anabolic treatment. Frail elderly individuals constitute another major target population for calcium and vitamin D because evidence from randomized studies in institutionalized elderly subjects demonstrates that these supplements reduce osteoporotic fracture risk, particularly in the presence of dietary deficiencies. However, the results of trials in community-dwelling subjects have been equivocal. Within the primary-care setting, further research is required to establish appropriate target subgroups for calcium and vitamin D supplementation; overall, the data are consistent with a benefit individuals with insufficient calcium and/or vitamin D, although patients with documented osteoporosis will derive further benefit in terms of fracture prevention from the addition of an antiresorptive agent.


Asunto(s)
Huesos/efectos de los fármacos , Calcio/uso terapéutico , Fracturas Espontáneas/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Vitamina D/uso terapéutico , Accidentes por Caídas/prevención & control , Anciano , Densidad Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Densidad Ósea/fisiología , Huesos/metabolismo , Huesos/fisiopatología , Calcio/deficiencia , Femenino , Fracturas Espontáneas/fisiopatología , Fracturas Espontáneas/prevención & control , Humanos , Hiperparatiroidismo/tratamiento farmacológico , Hiperparatiroidismo/fisiopatología , Hiperparatiroidismo/prevención & control , Masculino , Osteoporosis/fisiopatología , Osteoporosis/prevención & control , Factores de Riesgo , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/tratamiento farmacológico , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/prevención & control
12.
QJM ; 98(9): 667-76, 2005 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16006498

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Vitamin D inadequacy has been studied extensively, due to concerns about ageing populations, associations with osteoporosis and other disorders (including non-musculoskeletal), and high prevalence. AIM: To review recent reports on the prevalence of vitamin D inadequacy among post-menopausal women with and without osteoporosis and/or other musculoskeletal diseases. DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: We reviewed publications in the past 10 years reporting prevalence estimates for vitamin D inadequacy, reported as serum 25(OH)D values below various levels. Thirty published studies in the English language were identified, from January 1994 through April 2004. RESULTS: In osteoporotic populations, the prevalence of 25(OH) vitamin D concentration <12 ng/ml ranged from 12.5% to 76%, while prevalence rates reached 50% to 70% of patients with a history of fracture(s) using a cut-off of 15 ng/ml. In post-menopausal women, the prevalence of 25(OH) vitamin D concentrations

Asunto(s)
Posmenopausia , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/epidemiología , Anciano , Dieta , Femenino , Fracturas Óseas/etiología , Fracturas Óseas/metabolismo , Humanos , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/etiología , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/metabolismo , Prevalencia , Luz Solar , Vitamina D/administración & dosificación , Vitamina D/sangre , Vitaminas/administración & dosificación
13.
Osteoporos Int ; 15(7): 511-9, 2004 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15069595

RESUMEN

A European Union (EU) directive on vitamins and minerals used as ingredients of food supplements with a nutritional or physiological effect (2002/46/EC) was introduced in 2003. Its implications for the use of oral supplements of calcium and vitamin D in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis were discussed at a meeting organized with the help of the World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Center for Public Health Aspects of Rheumatic Diseases (Liège, Belgium) and the support of the WHO Collaborating Center for Osteoporosis Prevention (Geneva, Switzerland). The following issues were addressed: Is osteoporosis a physiological or a medical condition? What is the evidence for the efficacy of calcium and vitamin D in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis? What are the risks of self-management by patients in osteoporosis? From their discussions, the panel concluded that: (1) osteoporosis is a disease that requires continuing medical attention to ensure optimal therapeutic benefits; (2) when given in appropriate doses, calcium and vitamin D have been shown to be pharmacologically active (particularly in patients with dietary deficiencies), safe, and effective for the prevention and treatment of osteoporotic fractures; (3) calcium and vitamin D are an essential, but not sufficient, component of an integrated management strategy for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with dietary insufficiencies, although maximal benefit in terms of fracture prevention requires the addition of antiresorptive therapy; (4) calcium and vitamin D are a cost-effective medication in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis; (5) it is apparent that awareness of the efficacy of calcium and vitamin D in osteoporosis is still low and further work needs to be done to increase awareness among physicians, patients, and women at risk; and (6) in order that calcium and vitamin D continues to be manufactured to Good Manufacturing Practice standards and physicians and other health care professionals continue to provide guidance for the optimal use of these agents, they should continue to be classified as medicinal products.


Asunto(s)
Calcio de la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Suplementos Dietéticos , Osteoporosis/dietoterapia , Vitamina D/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Femenino , Fracturas Óseas/prevención & control , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteoporosis/prevención & control , Factores de Riesgo , Autocuidado
14.
J Bone Miner Res ; 17(11): 2080-6, 2002 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12412816

RESUMEN

This study was designed to evaluate the impact of estrogen versus androgen action on orchidectomy (ORX)-induced bone loss and associated changes in body composition. During an experimental period of 4 months, aged (12-month-old) ORX rats were treated with 17beta-estradiol (E2; 0.75 microg/day) or different doses of the nonaromatizable androgen 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone (DHT; 45, 75, and 150 microg/day, respectively), via subcutaneous (sc) silastic implants. Low doses of DHT and E2 inhibited the ORX-induced rise of bone turnover markers (serum osteocalcin and urinary deoxypyridinoline [DPD]) to a similar extent. High-dose DHT prevented the ORX-induced decrease of trabecular bone density but had no significant effect on cortical thinning as assessed by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT). This bone-sparing action of DHT occurred at the expense of hypertrophy of the ventral prostate and seminal vesicles. On the other hand, E2 restored both trabecular bone density and cortical thickness in ORX rats and even prevented age-related bone loss. In contrast to DHT, E2 increased lean body mass and inhibited the ORX-associated increase of fat mass, as measured by DXA. Administration of E2 was associated with increased serum concentrations of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) I and decreased circulating levels of leptin. We conclude that, in the aged ORX rat model, E2 is more effective in preventing ORX-induced bone loss than DHT. Additionally, E2 has anabolic effects on muscle tissue and prevents the ORX-related increase of fat mass. Overall, these data suggest that androgen action on bone and body composition is dependent on stimulation of both androgen receptors (ARs) and estrogen receptors (ERs).


Asunto(s)
Dihidrotestosterona/farmacología , Estradiol/farmacología , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Envejecimiento/fisiología , Anabolizantes/farmacología , Animales , Composición Corporal/efectos de los fármacos , Densidad Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Masculino , Orquiectomía , Ratas
15.
Acta Chir Belg ; 99(4): 185-9, 1999 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10499393

RESUMEN

Fractures of the proximal femur (intracapsular as well as trochanteric fractures) are the most devastating complication of osteoporosis. These fractures are not only associated with significant morbidity, but also with a severe risk of death (+/- 25%) within one year. The strongest predisposing factor for fractures of the proximal femur is low bone density. In addition, numerous studies provide evidence that several other factors, independently, contribute to hip fracture risk, including low body mass index, previous fractures, muscle weakness, impaired vision, cognitive impairment, history of hyperthyroidism, use of long-acting sedatives, and physical inactivity. These findings indicate the need for preventive strategies based on risk factor modification and also on measures to maintain bone density. In view of the growing incidence of subsequent fracture of the contralateral hip, preventive strategies should be initiated in all these patients as an integral part of the postsurgical management during the acute hospital stay. These strategies should not only include combined supplements of calcium and vitamin D to attenuate further bone loss, but also a comprehensive assessment of risk factors.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas de Cadera/prevención & control , Osteoporosis/complicaciones , Anciano , Índice de Masa Corporal , Densidad Ósea , Calcio/uso terapéutico , Trastornos del Conocimiento/complicaciones , Femenino , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Humanos , Hipertiroidismo/complicaciones , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/efectos adversos , Estilo de Vida , Masculino , Debilidad Muscular/complicaciones , Factores de Riesgo , Trastornos de la Visión/complicaciones , Vitamina D/uso terapéutico
16.
Am J Med ; 107(1): 24-9, 1999 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10403349

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Iron deficiency anemia is commonly caused by chronic gastrointestinal blood loss, and a thorough examination of the gastrointestinal tract has become standard practice. In contrast, iron deficiency without anemia has hardly been studied, and its causes are less certain. The aim of the present study was to determine the diagnostic value of upper and lower gastrointestinal evaluation in elderly hospitalized patients with iron deficiency, irrespective of the hemoglobin level. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective study, 151 consecutive elderly patients with iron deficiency (serum ferritin level < 50 microg/L at two separate occasions) were investigated using esophagogastroduodenoscopy with colonoscopy (n = 90) or barium enema (n = 61). RESULTS: A potential upper gastrointestinal tract lesion was found in 47 (49%) of the 96 anemic patients and in 31 (56%) of the 55 nonanemic patients (P = 0.38). Nonanemic patients had a greater prevalence of erosive gastritis or duodenitis. Anemic patients (72%) were more frequently investigated with a colonoscopy than nonanemic patients (38%, P = 0.001), and a lower gastrointestinal lesion was found in 32% of the anemic patients and 16% of the nonanemic patients (P = 0.03). Cancer was the most common lesion in the colon; 11 of the 18 patients were asymptomatic. Site-specific symptoms, fecal occult blood loss, and the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were not associated with the detection of gastrointestinal lesions. In 9.5% of the patients with a benign upper gastrointestinal lesion, a synchronous colonic tumor was found. CONCLUSION: Elderly patients with iron deficiency should undergo endoscopic examination, irrespective of the hemoglobin level. The presence of gastrointestinal symptoms, a positive fecal occult blood test, and the use of NSAIDs are of limited value in guiding the diagnostic procedure.


Asunto(s)
Anemia Ferropénica/etiología , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/complicaciones , Anciano , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , Femenino , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/complicaciones , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos
17.
Calcif Tissue Int ; 65(1): 34-40, 1999 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10369731

RESUMEN

In order to assess day-to-day variations of the circadian rhythm of biochemical bone resorption markers, urinary morning (6-8 a.m.) and evening (7-10 p.m.) samples from 35 individuals were monitored during 3 subsequent days. The bone-specific deoxypyridinoline (DPD) crosslinks of type I collagen followed a circadian rhythm in all individuals. In contrast, no such pattern was observed in the urinary hydroxyproline/creatinine and calcium/creatinine measurements. The DPD crosslink measurements showed a much larger difference between the morning and evening samples collected within 1 day compared with the variation between the samples collected in the morning or evening on subsequent days, indicating the importance of adequate timing of urine sampling for clinical trials aiming to monitor effects on bone resorption. The analysis of DPD crosslinks was then used to evaluate the effects of different patterns of dietary calcium intake on the circadian rhythm of bone resorption in osteoporotic patients. No significant effect on the circadian rhythm of the DPD crosslinks was found after concentrating the normal daily calcium intake to the evening (6-10 p.m.) during 8 days (n = 7). Ingestion of a dietary calcium supplement (600 mg) at 10 p.m. during 8 days (n = 7) resulted in an increased urinary calcium excretion in the morning, and a flattening of the circadian peak and nadir concentrations of urinary DPD/creatinine. The absolute levels of DPD/creatinine in the morning and evening urine samples, respectively, were not significantly altered compared with the control day. We conclude that dietary calcium supplementation in the evening only marginally affects the circadian rhythm of urinary DPD crosslinks in established osteoporosis patients.


Asunto(s)
Resorción Ósea/dietoterapia , Calcio de la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Ritmo Circadiano , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aminoácidos/orina , Resorción Ósea/orina , Calcio/orina , Climaterio , Creatinina/orina , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Hidroxiprolina/orina , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoartritis/dietoterapia , Osteoartritis/orina , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/dietoterapia , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/orina , Fosfatos/orina
18.
J Endocrinol ; 149(1): 13-7, 1996 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8676045

RESUMEN

In the United Kingdom, as many as 60% of institutionalized people who are not taking vitamin D supplements may be deficient. Both impaired mineralization and a hyperparathyroidism-related increase in bone turnover have been identified in the presence of vitamin D deficiency. Recent interventional data have confirmed the role of vitamin D deficiency in the pathogenesis of senile osteoporosis and indicated the need to maintain serum cholecalciferol levels within the normal range in elderly people.


Asunto(s)
Envejecimiento/metabolismo , Fracturas de Cadera/metabolismo , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/metabolismo , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Resorción Ósea/etiología , Humanos , Hiperparatiroidismo Secundario/complicaciones , Hiperparatiroidismo Secundario/etiología , Hiperparatiroidismo Secundario/metabolismo , Vitamina A/administración & dosificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA