Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Health Technol Assess ; 28(5): 1-266, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38343084

RESUMEN

Background: Up to 30% of children have constipation at some stage in their life. Although often short-lived, in one-third of children it progresses to chronic functional constipation, potentially with overflow incontinence. Optimal management strategies remain unclear. Objective: To determine the most effective interventions, and combinations and sequences of interventions, for childhood chronic functional constipation, and understand how they can best be implemented. Methods: Key stakeholders, comprising two parents of children with chronic functional constipation, two adults who experienced childhood chronic functional constipation and four health professional/continence experts, contributed throughout the research. We conducted pragmatic mixed-method reviews. For all reviews, included studies focused on any interventions/strategies, delivered in any setting, to improve any outcomes in children (0-18 years) with a clinical diagnosis of chronic functional constipation (excluding studies of diagnosis/assessment) included. Dual reviewers applied inclusion criteria and assessed risk of bias. One reviewer extracted data, checked by a second reviewer. Scoping review: We systematically searched electronic databases (including Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Excerpta Medica Database, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) (January 2011 to March 2020) and grey literature, including studies (any design) reporting any intervention/strategy. Data were coded, tabulated and mapped. Research quality was not evaluated. Systematic reviews of the evidence of effectiveness: For each different intervention, we included existing systematic reviews judged to be low risk of bias (using the Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Systematic Reviews), updating any meta-analyses with new randomised controlled trials. Where there was no existing low risk of bias systematic reviews, we included randomised controlled trials and other primary studies. The risk of bias was judged using design-specific tools. Evidence was synthesised narratively, and a process of considered judgement was used to judge certainty in the evidence as high, moderate, low, very low or insufficient evidence. Economic synthesis: Included studies (any design, English-language) detailed intervention-related costs. Studies were categorised as cost-consequence, cost-effectiveness, cost-utility or cost-benefit, and reporting quality evaluated using the consensus health economic criteria checklist. Systematic review of implementation factors: Included studies reported data relating to implementation barriers or facilitators. Using a best-fit framework synthesis approach, factors were synthesised around the consolidated framework for implementation research domains. Results: Stakeholders prioritised outcomes, developed a model which informed evidence synthesis and identified evidence gaps. Scoping review: 651 studies, including 190 randomised controlled trials and 236 primary studies, conservatively reported 48 interventions/intervention combinations. Effectiveness systematic reviews: studies explored service delivery models (n = 15); interventions delivered by families/carers (n = 32), wider children's workforce (n = 21), continence teams (n = 31) and specialist consultant-led teams (n = 42); complementary therapies (n = 15); and psychosocial interventions (n = 4). One intervention (probiotics) had moderate-quality evidence; all others had low to very-low-quality evidence. Thirty-one studies reported evidence relating to cost or resource use; data were insufficient to support generalisable conclusions. One hundred and six studies described implementation barriers and facilitators. Conclusions: Management of childhood chronic functional constipation is complex. The available evidence remains limited, with small, poorly conducted and reported studies. Many evidence gaps were identified. Treatment recommendations within current clinical guidelines remain largely unchanged, but there is a need for research to move away from considering effectiveness of single interventions. Clinical care and future studies must consider the individual characteristics of children. Study registration: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42019159008. Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 128470) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 5. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.


Between 5% and 30% of children experience constipation at some stage. In one-third of these children, this progresses to chronic functional constipation. Chronic functional constipation affects more children with additional needs. We aimed to find and bring together published information about treatments for chronic functional constipation, to help establish best treatments and treatment combinations. We did not cover assessment or diagnosis of chronic functional constipation. This project was guided by a 'stakeholder group', including parents of children with constipation, people who experienced constipation as children, and healthcare professionals/continence experts. We carried out a 'scoping review' and a series of 'systematic reviews'. Our 'scoping review' provides an overall picture of research about treatments, with 651 studies describing 48 treatments. This helps identify important evidence gaps. 'Systematic reviews' are robust methods of bringing together and interpreting research evidence. Our stakeholder group decided to structure our systematic reviews to reflect who delivered the interventions. We brought together evidence about how well treatments worked when delivered by families/carers (32 studies), the wider children's workforce (e.g. general practitioner, health visitor) (21 studies), continence teams (31 studies) or specialist consultant-led teams (42 studies). We also considered complementary therapies (15 studies) and behavioural strategies (4 studies). Care is affected by what is done and how it is done. We brought together evidence about different models of delivering care (15 studies), barriers and facilitators to implementation of treatments (106 studies) and costs (31 studies). Quality of evidence was mainly low to very low. Despite numerous studies, there was often insufficient information to support generalisable conclusions. Our findings generally agreed with current clinical guidelines. Management of childhood chronic functional constipation should be child-centred, multifaceted and adapted according to the individual child, their needs, the situation in which they live and the health-care setting in which they are looked after. Research is needed to address our identified evidence gaps.


Asunto(s)
Estreñimiento , Personal de Salud , Niño , Adulto , Humanos , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto , Estreñimiento/terapia
2.
Clin Transl Gastroenterol ; 11(12): e00267, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33512794

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Chronic constipation is associated with various comorbidities and reduced quality of life. Current solutions, either pharmacological or invasive, show limited efficacy. Manual colon-specific massage is a well-established intervention to treat chronic constipation, but it should be applied daily. MOWOOT automatically provides intermittent colonic exo-peristalsis (ICE) treatment like that in manual massage. METHODS: This study assessed the safety and effectiveness of the ICE device to treat chronic constipation due to neurogenic bowel dysfunction or idiopathic causes with high component of pelvic floor disorders. The ICE device was used daily for 20 minutes over 4 weeks. Each participant was followed for 9 consecutive weeks. The same outcome measures (primary: complete bowel movements per week; secondary: Knowles Eccersley Scott Symptom Score and Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life among others) were assessed at baseline (V1), last intervention weeks (V2), and post-treatment (V3). Responders were defined for selected outcomes as better results at V2 respect to V1. RESULTS: N = 92 adult patients constituted the intention-to-treat population, with N = 65 as the per protocol population. Adherence (quantity of treatment received) was ≥95% in the intention-to-treat population. Adverse events related with the treatment were low (8.7%). Using the device significantly increased the number of complete bowel movements per week (V2 - V1 = 1.8 [2.7], P < 0.0001), reduced the symptoms of chronic constipation (Knowles Eccersley Scott Symptom Score V2 - V1 = -3.9 [5.0], P < 0.0001), improved quality of life (Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life V2 - V1 = -0.7 [0.8], P < 0.0001), and facilitated a reduction in laxatives. Colon transit and fecal consistency were not modified. There was a high number of responders (>70%). DISCUSSION: Considering safety, adherence, and efficacy being demonstrated, the results favor the use of MOWOOT to treat chronic constipation (Visual abstract, Supplementary Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/CTG/A440).(Equation is included in full-text article.).


Asunto(s)
Estreñimiento/terapia , Masaje/instrumentación , Peristaltismo/fisiología , Adulto , Anciano , Colon/fisiopatología , Terapia Combinada/efectos adversos , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Estreñimiento/fisiopatología , Estreñimiento/psicología , Defecación/fisiología , Femenino , Humanos , Laxativos/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Masaje/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA