Anterior mitral line in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and anterior scar: A multicenter matched comparison-The MiLine study.

BACKGROUND: The benefit of an anterior mitral line (AML) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and anterior atrial scar undergoing ablation has never been investigated. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of AML in addition to standard treatment compared to standard treatment alone (no AML) in this subset of patients. METHODS: Patients with persistent AF and anterior low-voltage zone (LVZ) treated with AML in 3 centers were retrospectively enrolled. The patients were matched in 1:1 fashion with patients having persistent AF and anterior LVZ who underwent conventional ablation in the same centers. Matching parameters were age, LVZ burden, and repeated ablation. Primary endpoint was AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence. RESULTS: One hundred eight-six patients (age 66 ± 9 years; 34% women) were selected and divided into 2 matched groups. Bidirectional conduction block was achieved in 95% of AML. After median follow-up of 2 years, AF/AT recurrence occurred in 29% of the patients in the AML group vs 48% in the no AML group (log-rank P = .024). On Cox regression multivariate analysis, left atrial volume (hazard ratio [HR] 1.03; P = .006) and AML (HR 0.46; P = .003) were significantly associated with the primary endpoint. On univariate logistic regression, lower body mass index, older age, extensive anterior LVZ, and position of the left atrial activation breakthrough away from the AML were associated with first-pass AML block. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective matched analysis of patients with persistent AF and anterior scar, AML in addition to standard treatment was associated with improved AF/AT-free survival compared to standard treatment alone.

Contact Force in Atrial Fibrillation: Role of Atrial Rhythm and Ventricular Contractions: Co-Force Atrial Fibrillation Study.

BACKGROUND: In an experimental model, variable and intermittent contact force (CF) resulted in a significant decrease in lesion volume. In humans, variability of CF during pulmonary vein isolation has not been characterized. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 20 consecutive patients undergoing CF-guided circumferential pulmonary vein isolation, 914 radiofrequency applications (530 in sinus rhythm and 384 in atrial fibrillation) were analyzed. The variability of the 60% CF range (CF(60%)) was 17±9.6 g. Hundred seventy-one (19%) applications were delivered with constant, 717 (78%) with variable, and 26 (3%) with intermittent CF. The mean CF and force-time integral were significantly higher during applications with variable than with intermittent or constant CF. There was no significant difference in CF variability, CF(60%) variability, and force-time integral between applications delivered in sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation. The main reasons for CF variability were systolo-diastolic heart movement (29%) and respiration (27%). In 10 additional patients, during adenosine-induced atrioventricular block, the minimum CF significantly increased at 19 sites (5.3±4.4 versus 13.4±5.9 g; P<0.001) and at 16 sites intermittent or variable CF became constant. At only 1 site systolo-diastolic movement remained the main reason for variable CF. CONCLUSIONS: CF during pulmonary vein isolation remains highly variable despite efforts to optimize contact. CF and CF parameters were similar during sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation. The main reasons for CF variability are systolo-diastolic heart movement and respiration. The systolo-diastolic peaks and nadirs of CF are because of ventricular contractions at the large majority of pulmonary vein isolation sites.