SBRT for the Primary Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer: The Effect of Gleason Score, Dose and Heterogeneity of Intermediate Risk on Outcome Utilizing 2.2014 NCCN Risk Stratification Guidelines.

PURPOSE: To report an update of our previous experience using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the primary treatment of prostate cancer, risk stratified by the updated National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) version 2.2014, reporting efficacy and toxicity in a community hospital setting. METHODS: From 2007 to 2012, 142 localized prostate cancer patients were treated with SBRT using CyberKnife. NCCN guidelines Version 2.2014 risk groups analyzed included very low (20%), low (23%), intermediate (35%), and high (22%) risk. To further explore group heterogeneity and to comply with new guidelines, we separated our prior intermediate risk group into favorable intermediate and unfavorable intermediate groups depending on how many intermediate risk factors were present (one vs. > one). The unfavorable intermediate group was further analyzed in combination with the high risk group as per NCCN guidelines Version 2.2014. Various dose levels were used over the years of treatment, and have been categorized into low dose (35 Gy, n = 5 or 36.25 Gy, n = 107) and high dose (37.5 Gy, n = 30). All treatments were delivered in five fractions. Toxicity was assessed using radiation therapy oncology group criteria. RESULTS: Five-year actuarial freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF) was 100, 91.7, 95.2, 90.0, and 86.7% for very low, low, intermediate and high risk patients, respectively. A significant difference in 5 year FFBF was noted for patients with Gleason score (GS) ≥8 vs. 7 vs. 5/6 (p = 0.03) and low vs. high dose (p = 0.05). T-stage, pretreatment PSA, age, risk stratification group, and use of ADT did not affect 5-year FFBF. Multivariate analysis revealed GS and dose to be the most predictive factors for 5-year FFBF. CONCLUSION: Our experience with SBRT for the primary treatment of localized prostate cancer demonstrates favorable efficacy and toxicity comparable to the results reported for IMRT in literature. GS remains the single most important pretreatment predictor of outcome.

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for radiation-induced cystitis and proctitis.

PURPOSE: To provide a retrospective analysis of the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) for treating hemorrhagic cystitis (HC) and proctitis secondary to pelvic- and prostate-only radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Nineteen patients were treated with HBOT for radiation-induced HC and proctitis. The median age at treatment was 66 years (range, 15-84 years). The range of external-beam radiation delivered was 50.0-75.6 Gy. Bleeding must have been refractory to other therapies. Patients received 100% oxygen at 2.0 atmospheres absolute pressure for 90-120 min per treatment in a monoplace chamber. Symptoms were retrospectively scored according to the Late Effects of Normal Tissues-Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic (LENT-SOMA) scale to evaluate short-term efficacy. Recurrence of hematuria/hematochezia was used to assess long-term efficacy. RESULTS: Four of the 19 patients were lost to follow-up. Fifteen patients were evaluated and received a mean of 29.8 dives: 11 developed HC and 4 proctitis. All patients experienced a reduction in their LENT-SOMA score. After completion of HBOT, the mean LENT-SOMA score was reduced from 0.78 to 0.20 in patients with HC and from 0.66 to 0.26 in patients with proctitis. Median follow-up was 39 months (range, 7-70 months). No cases of hematuria were refractory to HBOT. Complete resolution of hematuria was seen in 81% (n = 9) and partial response in 18% (n = 2). Recurrence of hematuria occurred in 36% (n = 4) after a median of 10 months. Complete resolution of hematochezia was seen in 50% (n = 2), partial response in 25% (n = 1), and refractory bleeding in 25% (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy is appropriate for radiation-induced HC once less time-consuming therapies have failed to resolve the bleeding. In these conditions, HBOT is efficacious in the short and long term, with minimal side effects.

A Phase II study of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor radioimmunotherapy in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme.

OBJECT: This single-institution Phase II study tests the efficacy of adjuvant radioimmunotherapy with (125)I-labeled anti-epidermal growth factor receptor 425 murine monoclonal antibody ((125)I-mAb 425) in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). METHODS: A total of 192 patients with GBM were treated with (125)I-mAb 425 over a course of 3 weekly intravenous injections of 1.8 GBq following surgery and radiation therapy. The primary end point was overall survival, and the secondary end point was toxicity. Additional subgroup analyses were performed comparing treatment with (125)I-mAb 425 (RIT, 132 patients), (125)I-mAb 425 and temozolomide (TMZ+RIT, 60 patients), and a historical control group (CTL, 81 patients). RESULTS: The median age was 53 years (range 19-78 years), and the median Karnofsky Performance Scale score was 80 (range 60-100). The percentage of patients who underwent debulking surgery was 77.6% and that of those receiving temozolomide was 31.3%. The overall median survival was 15.7 months (95% CI 13.6-17.8 months). The 1- and 2-year survivals were 62.5 and 25.5%, respectively. For subgroups RIT and TMZ+RIT, the median survivals were 14.5 and 20.2 months, respectively. No Grade 3 or 4 toxicity was seen with the administration of (125)I-mAb 425. The CTL patients lacked Karnofsky Performance Scale scores, had poorer survival, were older, and were less likely to receive radiation therapy. On multivariate analysis, the hazard ratios for RIT versus CTL, TMZ+RIT versus CTL, and TMZ+RIT versus RIT were 0.49 (p < 0.001), 0.30 (p < 0.001), and 0.62 (p = 0.008), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this large Phase II study of 192 patients with GBM treated with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (125)I-mAb 425 radioimmunotherapy, survival was 15.7 months, and treatment was safe and well tolerated.

Radioimmunotherapy as a novel treatment regimen: 125I-labeled monoclonal antibody 425 in the treatment of high-grade brain gliomas.

A Phase I/II clinical trial was undertaken between January 29, 1987 and January 25, 1997 to assess the efficacy of (125)I-labeled monoclonal antibody 425 ((125)I-MAb 425) in controlling high-grade brain gliomas. A total of 180 patients diagnosed with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and astrocytoma with anaplastic foci (AAF) were administered (125)I-MAb 425 as an adjuvant treatment. All underwent initial surgery followed by postoperative external beam radiation therapy and a cumulative dose of 140 mCi of (125)I-MAb 425. Biodistribution of radioactivity after antibody administration showed increased uptake in brain tumor cells due to enhanced expression of epidermal growth factor receptors. A longer half-life of (125)I-MAb 425 in brain tumor cells compared to blood was observed. All patients were followed up for at least 5 years. Overall actuarial survival range for GBM and AAF patients showed 4-150 and 4-270 months, respectively. GBM and AAF patients under age 40 years with a Karnofsky performance status >70 had an actuarial median survival of 22.5 and 65 months, respectively. This adjuvant therapy demonstrates a significant increase in median survival and should be considered in the management of high-grade brain gliomas.

Radioiodinated (I-125) monoclonal antibody 425 in the treatment of high grade glioma patients: ten-year synopsis of a novel treatment.

The present report is the follow-up of patients enrolled in a phase II clinical trial using I-MAb 425 as an adjuvant treatment for high grade gliomas. Patient median survivals support published data from an earlier preliminary report. From January 29, 1987 to January 25, 1997, 180 patients diagnosed with astrocytoma with anaplastic foci (AAF) and glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) were treated as outpatients with an average of three weekly intravenous or intraarterial injections of radiolabeled MAb 425. The mean dose was 140 mCi (5.2 GBq). Only one patient who received a single dose of more than 60 mCi (2.2 GBq) experienced acute toxicity. Patients received prior surgery and radiation therapy, with and without chemotherapy. Overall median survival for patients with GBM and AAF was 13.4 and 50.9 months, respectively, with Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ranging from 40 to 100 and age ranging from 11 to 75 years. Prognostic factors (KPS and age) correlated positively with increased survival, with KPS the most important determinant of median survival. Data analysis was performed on patients followed 5 years or longer. We conclude that the administration of I-MAb 425 with intensive medical management demonstrates a significant increase in median survival and should be considered a therapeutic regimen for the management of patients with high grade gliomas.

Combined plaque radiotherapy and transpupillary thermotherapy for choroidal melanoma: tumor control and treatment complications in 270 consecutive patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate tumor control and treatment complications following plaque radiotherapy combined with transpupillary thermotherapy for choroidal melanoma. DESIGN: Prospective noncomparative interventional case series. INTERVENTION: All patients received treatment for choroidal melanoma using plaque radiotherapy followed by 3 sessions of transpupillary thermotherapy provided at plaque removal and at 4-month intervals. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred seventy patients with newly diagnosed choroidal melanoma. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The 2 main outcome measures included local tumor recurrence and treatment-related complications. The clinical data regarding patient features, tumor features, radiotherapy and thermotherapy parameters were analyzed for their effect on the 2 main outcomes using Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: Prior to treatment, the median base of the tumor was 11 mm (range, 4-21 mm) and the median thickness was 4 mm (range, 2-9 mm). Most tumors were located in the posterior pole with a median proximity of 2 mm to the foveola and 2 mm to the optic disc. The median radiotherapy dose to the tumor apex was 9000 rad. Transpupillary thermotherapy was applied in 3 sessions at 4-month intervals for a median of 700 mW. The tumor decreased in thickness to a median of 2.3 mm by 1 year and 2.1 mm by 2 years' follow-up with stable findings thereafter. Using Kaplan-Meier estimates, tumor recurrence was 2% at 2 years and 3% at 5 years. Risk factors for tumor recurrence included macular location of the tumor epicenter (P =.03), diffuse tumor configuration (P =.005), and tumor margin extending underneath the foveola (P =.001). Using Kaplan-Meier estimates, treatment-related complications at 5 years included maculopathy in 18% of the participants, papillopathy in 38%, macular retinal vascular obstruction in 18%, vitreous hemorrhage in 18%, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in 2%, cataract in 6%, and neovascular glaucoma in 7%. Enucleation for radiation complications was necessary in 3 cases (1%). CONCLUSION: Plaque radiotherapy combined with transpupillary thermotherapy provides excellent local tumor control with only 3% recurrence at 5 years' follow-up.