Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Cancer ; 51(13): 1812-21, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26093811

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This analysis was performed to further characterise treatment-emergent hypocalcaemia in patients with bone metastases receiving denosumab. METHODS: Laboratory abnormalities and adverse events of hypocalcaemia in patients with metastatic bone disease were analysed using data from three identically designed phase 3 trials of subcutaneous denosumab 120 mg (n = 2841) versus intravenous zoledronic acid 4 mg (n = 2836). RESULTS: The overall incidence of laboratory events of hypocalcaemia grade ⩾ 2 was higher with denosumab (12.4%) than with zoledronic acid (5.3%). Hypocalcaemia events were primarily grade 2 in severity and usually occurred within the first 6 months of treatment. Patients who reported taking calcium and/or vitamin D supplements had a lower incidence of hypocalcaemia. Prostate cancer or small-cell lung cancer, reduced creatinine clearance and higher baseline bone turnover markers of urinary N-telopeptide of type I collagen (uNTx; > 50 versus ⩽ 50 nmol/mmol) and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP; > 20.77 µg/L [median] versus ⩽ 20.77 µg/L) values were important risk factors for developing hypocalcaemia. The risk associated with increased baseline BSAP levels was greater among patients who had > 2 bone metastases at baseline versus those with ⩽ 2 bone metastases at baseline. CONCLUSION: Hypocalcaemia was more frequent with denosumab versus zoledronic acid, consistent with denosumab's greater antiresorptive effect. Low serum calcium levels and potential vitamin D deficiency should be corrected before initiating treatment with a potent osteoclast inhibitor, and corrected serum calcium levels should be monitored during treatment. Adequate calcium and vitamin D intake appears to substantially reduce the risk of hypocalcaemia.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Óseas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Calcio/sangre , Denosumab/efectos adversos , Hipocalcemia/inducido químicamente , Biomarcadores/sangre , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Difosfonatos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Hipocalcemia/sangre , Hipocalcemia/diagnóstico , Hipocalcemia/epidemiología , Hipocalcemia/prevención & control , Imidazoles/efectos adversos , Incidencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/complicaciones , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/diagnóstico , Ácido Zoledrónico
2.
J Clin Oncol ; 28(35): 5132-9, 2010 Dec 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21060033

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This randomized study compared denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against receptor activator of nuclear factor κ B (RANK) ligand, with zoledronic acid in delaying or preventing skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with breast cancer with bone metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either subcutaneous denosumab 120 mg and intravenous placebo (n = 1,026) or intravenous zoledronic acid 4 mg adjusted for creatinine clearance and subcutaneous placebo (n = 1,020) every 4 weeks. All patients were strongly recommended to take daily calcium and vitamin D supplements. The primary end point was time to first on-study SRE (defined as pathologic fracture, radiation or surgery to bone, or spinal cord compression). RESULTS: Denosumab was superior to zoledronic acid in delaying time to first on-study SRE (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.95; P = .01 superiority) and time to first and subsequent (multiple) on-study SREs (rate ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.89; P = .001). Reduction in bone turnover markers was greater with denosumab. Overall survival, disease progression, and rates of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs were similar between groups. An excess of renal AEs and acute-phase reactions occurred with zoledronic acid; hypocalcemia occurred more frequently with denosumab. Osteonecrosis of the jaw occurred infrequently (2.0%, denosumab; 1.4%, zoledronic acid; P = .39). CONCLUSION: Denosumab was superior to zoledronic acid in delaying or preventing SREs in patients with breast cancer metastatic to bone and was generally well tolerated. With the convenience of a subcutaneous injection and no requirement for renal monitoring, denosumab represents a potential treatment option for patients with bone metastases.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Óseas/prevención & control , Neoplasias Óseas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Difosfonatos/uso terapéutico , Imidazoles/uso terapéutico , Ligando RANK/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Enfermedades Óseas/etiología , Neoplasias Óseas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Huesos/efectos de los fármacos , Denosumab , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ácido Zoledrónico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA