The Influence of Endogenous Testosterone on Incidental Prostate Cancer after Transurethral Prostate Resection.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that endogenous total testosterone (TT) may relate to incidental prostate cancer (iPCA) in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with prostate enlargement undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). METHODS: The hypothesis was tested in contemporary cohort of patients who underwent TURP because of LUTS due to prostate enlargement after excluding the suspect of PCA. In period running from January 2017 to November 2019, 389 subjects were evaluated. Endogenous testosterone was measured preoperatively between 8:00 and 10:00 o'clock in the morning. Relationships between TT and iPCA were evaluated by statistical methods. RESULTS: Overall, iPCA was detected in 18 cases (4.6%) with clinical stage cT1a or International Society of Urologic Pathology (ISUP) < 2 in 11 patients (61.1%). Endogenous testosterone was inversely associated with age and BMI in the study population but not in the subgroup with iPCA in wholly endogenous TT strongly correlated to both number of chips involved by cancer (Pearson's correlation coefficient, r = 0.553; p = 0.017) and ISUP > 2 (r = 0.504; p = 0.033). The positive association of endogenous TT with both tumor load and tumor grade was confirmed by the linear regression model with high-regression coefficients for the former (regression coefficient, b = 0.307; 95% confidence interval, 95% CI: 0.062-0.551; and p = 0.017) as for the latter (b = 5.898; 95% CI: 0.546-11.249; and p = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative endogenous TT is associated with features of iPCA. The influence of iPCA on endogenous testosterone needs to be addressed by a large multicenter prospective trial.

Incidental prostate cancer after transurethral resection of the prostate: analysis of incidence and risk factors in 458 patients.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of incidental prostate cancer (IPCA) in a contemporary cohort of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) patients who underwent trans-urethral resection of the prostate (TURP). METHODS: A series of 458 consecutive patients who underwent TURP were evaluated between January 2016 to June 2018. Evaluated factors included age (years), Body Mass Index (BMI; kg/square meters), treatment with inhibitors of 5-alpha reductase, previous prostate biopsies, basal prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels (ng/mL), serum leukocyte count (×109/L), weight of resected prostate tissue (grams), grade and stage of IPCA. The multivariate logistic regression model evaluated associations of significant clinical factors with the risk of IPCA. RESULTS: Overall, IPCA was detected in 30 of 454 patients (6.6%). A mean of 21.8 g of tissue was resected. The mean number of positive chips was 5.6 (mean percentage 3.9%) with tumor grade group 1 in 22 cases (73.4%) and tumor stage cT1a in 23 patients (76.7%). On multivariate analysis, independent factors that were positively associated with the risk of IPCA were BMI (odds ratio, OR=1.121; P=0.017) and leukocyte count (OR=1.144; P=0.027). CONCLUSIONS: In a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing TURP for the treatment of LUTS, the risk of IPCA was not negligible with a rate of being 6.6%. BMI and serum leukocyte count were found to be independent factors that were positively associated with the risk of IPCA.

Utility of racemase and other immunomarkers in the detection of adenocarcinoma in prostatic tissue damaged by high intensity focused ultrasound therapy.

AIMS: High intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is an emerging alternative for the treatment of prostate adenocarcinoma. Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) has been shown to be a sensitive immunomarker for prostate cancer, however, there is no information available concerning its utility and that of other immunomarkers for the detection of malignancy after HIFU therapy. METHODS: AMACR expression was examined in 11 cases of prostatic carcinoma treated by HIFU, with histological evidence of residual carcinoma. In seven cases tumour was examined from thin core biopsies and in four cases from tissue fragments obtained by transurethral resection of prostate (TURP). In addition to AMACR, immunostaining was also undertaken for p63, cytokeratin 34betaE12, cytokeratin 5, cytokeratin 8-18, prostate specific alkaline phosphatase (PSAP), prostate specific antigen (PSA), chromogranin and CD56. RESULTS: In two of the cases foci of tumour were cut out in serial sections. AMACR was expressed in eight of nine evaluable cases (4/5 biopsies and 4/4 TURP specimens). Cytokeratin 8-18 and PSAP were positive in all cases, whereas PSA was positive in five of nine cases. Cytokeratin 34betaE12, cytokeratin 5, and p63 marked the basal layer in normal prostatic glands, but were negative in neoplastic glands. In four cases we found tumour cells with positive staining for CD56 and chromogranin. CONCLUSIONS: A panel with positive markers for AMACR, and negative markers for p63/cytokeratin 5/cytokeratin 34betaE12 confirms the neoplastic nature of the residual glands on biopsies or TURP fragments sampled after HIFU therapy.

Risk stratification and prognostication of renal cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: To review the most recent data on prognostic factors and describe the characteristics and prognostic accuracy of the most important prognostic systems available to predict the risk of recurrence, progression, and mortality in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: The study was based on a non-systematic review of literature. RESULTS: Clinical (performance status, and mode of presentation), anatomical (size and extension of the primary tumor, lymph node involvement, and distant metastasis), and histological factors (histological subtypes, nuclear grade, and tumor necrosis) are the most largely evaluated prognostic factors in RCC. Valuable prognostic accuracy has been shown for several laboratory parameters (erythrocyte sedimentation rate, platelet count, serum calcium, hemoglobin, and lactate dehydrogenase levels) and a few genetical and molecular markers (CAIX, B7-H1, and B7-H4). A few integrating systems have been proposed and validated, integrating both clinical and pathological (UCLA Integrating Staging Systems, Kattan nomogram, and Sorbellini nomogram) or only pathological variables (SSIGN score). CONCLUSIONS: Several large and methodologically consistent studies have been published. The chance to integrate the data derived from each prognostic factor into prognostic algorithms and scores has allowed improving significantly the stratification of the prognosis of patients with RCC. The currently available prognostic systems can be further improved through the inclusion of molecular and genetic variables. Integrating prognostic systems should be used to design randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which will evaluate the efficacy of the new-targeted therapies in either neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or salvage treatments of patients with RCC.