Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Genomics ; 16: 472, 2015 Jun 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26091899

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Potato virus Y (PVY) is one of the most important plant viruses affecting potato production. The interactions between potato and PVY are complex and the outcome of the interactions depends on the potato genotype, the PVY strain, and the environmental conditions. A potato cultivar can induce resistance to a specific PVY strain, yet be susceptible to another. How a single potato cultivar responds to PVY in both compatible and incompatible interactions is not clear. RESULTS: In this study, we used RNA-sequencing (RNA-Seq) to investigate and compare the transcriptional changes in leaves of potato upon inoculation with PVY. We used two potato varieties: Premier Russet, which is resistant to the PVY strain O (PVY(O)) but susceptible to the strain NTN (PVY(NTN)), and Russet Burbank, which is susceptible to all PVY strains that have been tested. Leaves were inoculated with PVY(O) or PVY(NTN), and samples were collected 4 and 10 h post inoculation (hpi). A larger number of differentially expressed (DE) genes were found in the compatible reactions compared to the incompatible reaction. For all treatments, the majority of DE genes were down-regulated at 4 hpi and up-regulated at 10 hpi. Gene Ontology enrichment analysis showed enrichment of the biological process GO term "Photosynthesis, light harvesting" specifically in PVY(O)-inoculated Premier Russet leaves, while the GO term "nucleosome assembly" was largely overrepresented in PVY(NTN)-inoculated Premier Russet leaves and PVY(O)-inoculated Russet Burbank leaves but not in PVY(O)-inoculated Premier Russet leaves. Fewer genes were DE over 4-fold in the incompatible reaction compared to the compatible reactions. Amongst these, five genes were DE only in PVY(O)-inoculated Premier Russet leaves, and all five were down-regulated. These genes are predicted to encode for a putative ABC transporter, a MYC2 transcription factor, a VQ-motif containing protein, a non-specific lipid-transfer protein, and a xyloglucan endotransglucosylase-hydroxylase. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that the incompatible and compatible reactions in Premier Russet shared more similarities, in particular during the initial response, than the compatible reactions in the two different hosts. Our results identify potential key processes and genes that determine the fate of the reaction, compatible or incompatible, between PVY and its host.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de las Plantas/genética , Enfermedades de las Plantas/virología , Virus de Plantas/patogenicidad , Potyvirus/patogenicidad , ARN/genética , Solanum tuberosum/genética , Solanum tuberosum/virología , Regulación hacia Abajo/genética , Genoma Viral/genética , Genotipo , Hojas de la Planta/genética , Hojas de la Planta/virología , Análisis de Secuencia de ARN/métodos , Transcripción Genética/genética , Regulación hacia Arriba/genética
2.
Mol Nutr Food Res ; 58(10): 2001-13, 2014 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25044704

RESUMEN

SCOPE: Epidemiological studies provide evidence that consumption of cruciferous vegetables, like broccoli, can reduce the risk of cancer development. Sulforaphane (SFN) is a phytochemical derived from cruciferous vegetables that induces anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic responses in prostate cancer cells, but not in normal prostate cells. The mechanisms responsible for this cancer-specific cytotoxicity remain unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: We utilized RNA sequencing and determined the transcriptomes of normal prostate epithelial cells, androgen-dependent prostate cancer cells, and androgen-independent prostate cancer cells treated with SFN. SFN treatment dynamically altered gene expression and resulted in distinct transcriptome profiles depending on prostate cell line. SFN also down-regulated the expression of genes that were up-regulated in prostate cancer cells. Network analysis of genes altered by SFN treatment revealed that the transcription factor Specificity protein 1 (Sp1) was present in an average of 90.5% of networks. Sp1 protein was significantly decreased by SFN treatment in prostate cancer cells and Sp1 may be an important mediator of SFN-induced changes in expression. CONCLUSION: Overall, the data show that SFN alters gene expression differentially in normal and cancer cells with key targets in chemopreventive processes, making it a promising dietary anti-cancer agent.


Asunto(s)
Anticarcinógenos/farmacología , Isotiocianatos/farmacología , Proteínas de Neoplasias/antagonistas & inhibidores , Próstata/efectos de los fármacos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Factor de Transcripción Sp1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Transcriptoma/efectos de los fármacos , Anticarcinógenos/efectos adversos , Carcinogénesis/efectos de los fármacos , Línea Celular Tumoral , Células Cultivadas , Quimioprevención , Suplementos Dietéticos/efectos adversos , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica/efectos de los fármacos , Silenciador del Gen , Humanos , Isotiocianatos/efectos adversos , Masculino , Proteínas de Neoplasias/genética , Proteínas de Neoplasias/metabolismo , Próstata/citología , Próstata/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Próstata/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/metabolismo , ARN Interferente Pequeño , Factor de Transcripción Sp1/genética , Factor de Transcripción Sp1/metabolismo , Sulfóxidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA