Development and Testing of a Spiritual Resourcefulness Scale: Holistic Expansion in Operationalizing the Resourcefulness Construct.

Purpose: Research supports holistic expansion of the construct of resourcefulness by adding spiritual practices to the existing personal and social dimensions. This study describes the development and testing of items to measure spiritual resourcefulness. Methods/Design: Study phases were: (1) focus group development of item stems and responses; (2) expert testing; (3) scale construction; (4) field testing in 234 family caregivers; and (5) psychometric analysis to identify items for inclusion in a final scale. Findings: A focus group developed 40 item stems with potential responses reflecting three conceptual components of spiritual practices (rational, ritualistic, and relational). Content experts selected the best response for each item. A six-point Likert scale consistent with the Resourcefulness Scale© was constructed. Data from field testing were factor analyzed. The best solution revealed two factors containing 12 items. Ritualistic and relational items loaded together (44.7% variance explained). Rational items loaded separately (19.5% variance explained). Higher-order factor analysis indicated the two subscales reflected a single construct (71.93% variance explained; r = .44, p < .001). Conclusion: Availability of a psychometrically sound measure of spiritual resourcefulness is critical to expand resourcefulness training interventions to be more holistic. Clinical interventions can be enriched by including strategies to enhance personal, social, and spiritual resourcefulness skills.

Theoretical and Operational Consideration of Mindfulness, Resilience, and Resourcefulness.

Mindfulness, resilience, and resourcefulness are theoretically distinct but related constructs critical for improving psychosocial well-being outcomes for informal caregivers and others. Our aims were to evaluate the theoretical and operational distinctions among these constructs. Measures of mindfulness (Decentering Scale), resilience (Connor-Davidson Scale) and resourcefulness (Resourcefulness Scale) were collected from a national sample of 348 grandmother caregivers. We conducted exploratory factor analysis and examined correlation patterns. Inter-correlations ranged from r= .26 (resourcefulness and resilience) to r= .73 (resilience and mindfulness). Factor analyses and scree plots indicated unidimensional factors for resilience and for mindfulness, and two factors for resourcefulness (personal and social). When items from all measures were analyzed together, the four factors remained. Distinct relationships were found between mindfulness, resilience, and resourcefulness with relevant external variables. Our results support the conceptual distinctions among the constructs, providing support for interventions targeting these constructs to improve psychosocial outcomes in caregivers.

Is There More to Resourcefulness Than Personal and Social Skills?

This study examined relationships among personal and social resourcefulness and spiritual practices and their associations with perceived stress, depressive symptoms, and self-assessed health in 138 women caregivers of elders with dementia. Caregivers who rated high on personal and social resourcefulness and spiritual practices (by median splits) had the lowest perceived stress, fewest depressive symptoms, and best self-assessed health, followed in sequence by women rating high on two of the three, high on one of the three, and low on all three. Hierarchical regression analyses that introduced spiritual practices after resourcefulness showed significant increases in the R-square change by 3% and 5% for perceived stress and depressive symptoms, respectively, but no significant change for self-assessed health. Strong associations among personal and social resourcefulness and spiritual practices, and similar relationships with two health outcomes, suggest that spiritual practices may be a third dimension of resourcefulness.

Racial Difference in Response to Vitamin D Supplementation.

UNLABELLED: This manuscript is the result of work supported by the use of resources and facilities at the Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, specifically, the Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC). BACKGROUND: Deficiency in 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) is common, especially in the elderly and African Americans (AA). While 25(OH) D deficiency is associated with multiple negative health outcomes, current recommendations for supplementation of this deficiency may be insufficient. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of 25(OH)D deficiency, the extent of vitamin D supplementation, and the effect of supplementation on 25(OH) D levels in an elderly Veteran population. The study also focused specifically on the role of race in the risk for 25(OH)D deficiency and in the response to vitamin D supplementation. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of information including 25(OH)D serum levels pre and post-supplementation, race, and vitamin D supplementation. Subjects were community-dwelling Veterans (≥60years) followed by a VA geriatric clinic. A total of 234 charts were reviewed (124 Caucasian, 78 AA, 32 other/unknown race). Information collected through the chart review was analyzed by comparing the means of 25(OH)D levels pre and post-supplementation across races and across times. RESULTS: At Baseline 206 subjects (88%) were 25(OH)D deficient (<32ng/ml). While 80.6% of them were supplemented, only 10.24% (17 of 166) achieved normal 25(OH)D serum levels. AAs (n=78) had significantly lower Baseline levels compared to Caucasians (n=124) and differences were consistent across time. Fewer AAs than Caucasians increased to normal (AA:6.3%; Caucasian:12.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Conservative oral vitamin D supplementation is largely ineffective at achieving therapeutic serum levels, especially for AAs. Future research is needed to focus on individualized supplementation strategies and targeted risk factors such as race.