Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Medicinas Complementárias
Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Pediatr Surg ; 49(5): 807-10, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24851775

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Precocious puberty treatment traditionally meant anxiety-provoking monthly depot injections until the advent of the annually implanted histrelin capsule. This study is the first to evaluate the surgical and anesthetic aspects of histrelin implantation for precocious puberty. METHODS: All cases from one surgeon at a tertiary pediatric hospital were reviewed for patient age, anesthetic type, technical difficulties, and complications. RESULTS: From 12/2007 to 3/2013, 114 cases (49% implantations, 25% removals/re-implantations, 25% removals) were performed. Local anesthesia was employed in 100% of non-general anesthesia cases (n=109, 96%), augmented by inhaled N2O in 49%. Five patients (4%) underwent general anesthesia: three neurologically-impaired and two coordinated with scheduled MRIs. Procedural difficulties (n=18, 16%) included implant fracture during removal (n=16/58 removals, 28%). Fracture never occurred during implantation. Three children (3%) suffered complications. One infection was treated with antibiotics, and two implants were removed for systemic allergic reaction. Six children (5%) had unscheduled post-operative checks for pain (n=3, 3%), allergy to elastic dressing (n=2, 2%), or rash (n=1, 1%). Mean charges for general anesthesia were $10,188±1292 versus $528±147 for N2O or local alone (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: While histrelin implantation is straightforward, removal presents technical challenges. Local anesthesia, with possible N2O supplementation, is well-tolerated and introduces substantial resource and cost savings.


Asunto(s)
Implantes de Medicamentos/administración & dosificación , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/análogos & derivados , Pubertad Precoz/tratamiento farmacológico , Anestesia General , Anestesia Local , Anestésicos por Inhalación/administración & dosificación , Cápsulas , Niño , Sedación Consciente/métodos , Ahorro de Costo , Remoción de Dispositivos , Implantes de Medicamentos/efectos adversos , Implantes de Medicamentos/economía , Falla de Equipo , Femenino , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad/etiología , Infecciones/etiología , Masculino , Óxido Nitroso/administración & dosificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
2.
J Pediatr Surg ; 49(3): 447-50, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24650475

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Initial antibiotics with planned interval appendectomy (interval AP) have been used to treat patients with complicated perforated appendicitis; however, little experience exists with this approach in children with suspected acute perforated appendicitis (SAPA). We sought to determine the outcome of initial antibiotics and interval AP in children with SAPA. METHODS: Over an 18-month period, 751 consecutive patients underwent appendectomy including 105 patients with SAPA who were treated with initial intravenous antibiotics and planned interval AP ≥ 8 weeks after presentation. All SAPA patients had symptoms for ≤ 96 hours. Primary outcome variables were rates of readmission, abscess formation, and need for interval AP prior to the planned ≥ 8 weeks. RESULTS: Intraabdominal abscess rate was 27%. Appendectomy prior to planned interval AP was 11% and readmission occurred in 34%. All patients underwent eventual appendectomy with pathologic confirmation confirming the previous appendiceal inflammation. White blood cell (WBC) count >15,000, WBC >15,000 plus fecalith on imaging, and WBC >15,000 plus duration of symptoms >48 hours were all significantly associated with higher rates of readmission (p=0.01, p=0.04, p=0.02) and need for interval AP prior to the planned ≥ 8 weeks (p=0.003, p=0.05, p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of SAPA with antibiotics and planned interval AP is successful in the majority of patients; however, complications such as abscess formation and/or readmission prior to planned interval AP occur in up to one-third of patients. Certain clinical variables are associated with increased treatment complications.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Apendicectomía/métodos , Apendicitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Apendicitis/cirugía , Peritonitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Absceso Abdominal/etiología , Absceso Abdominal/cirugía , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Apendicitis/complicaciones , Niño , Vías Clínicas , Esquema de Medicación , Combinación de Medicamentos , Fiebre/etiología , Humanos , Perforación Intestinal/etiología , Perforación Intestinal/cirugía , Readmisión del Paciente , Ácido Penicilánico/análogos & derivados , Ácido Penicilánico/uso terapéutico , Peritonitis/etiología , Piperacilina/uso terapéutico , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam , Estudios Prospectivos , Succión , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
J Pediatr Surg ; 39(3): 495-9; discussion 495-9, 2004 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15017577

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Minor surgical procedures in children, while usually not requiring general anesthesia, need effective control of pain, anxiety, and motion. Certain techniques of conscious sedation may result in loss of protective airway reflexes. Nitrous oxide, however, when inhaled at levels below 50% maintains protective reflexes and does not require fasting or postprocedure monitoring. This study prospectively examines the efficacy of nitrous oxide analgesia in children undergoing outpatient surgical procedures. METHODS: Over a 2-year period (2000 to 2002), 150 consecutive children were given nitrous oxide analgesia as an alternative to a general anesthetic, sedation, or local anesthetic alone. Nitrous oxide (<50%) was administered by our practice's sedation-certified nurse practitioner without an anesthesiologist present. The children used the Wong-Baker Faces Scale (0-5) to score pain at different intervals (preprocedure, at injection, during procedure, and postprocedure) and event memories were tabulated. RESULTS: Of 150 children, 5 were uncooperative and could not participate. One hundred forty-five children, ages 1 to 20 years (Mean, 9.83 +/- 4.92 years) successfully underwent procedures (58 cyst/nevus excisions, 49 abscess drainages, 38 other) using nitrous. Two patients were too young to score pain. Pre- and postprocedure pain scores were significantly higher in the abscess group (P <.0001); during the procedures, however, all groups reported pain scores less than 1, with parents citing 100% satisfaction with the technique. Of 128 children receiving local anesthesia, 107 (84%) had no recall of the injection. Complications were limited to 4 patients; 2 experienced nausea, and 2 vomited. All resolved without interrupting the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Nitrous oxide analgesia is a cost-effective and efficacious alternative to conscious sedation or general anesthesia for minor pediatric surgical procedures. In the office or outpatient setting, the technique provides for almost pain/anxiety-free surgery, no postoperative monitoring, and a high degree of satisfaction for patients, parents, and staff.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/métodos , Analgesia/métodos , Anestésicos por Inhalación/administración & dosificación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Menores/métodos , Óxido Nitroso/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Analgesia/economía , Niño , Preescolar , Sedación Consciente , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Dimensión del Dolor , Satisfacción del Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA