Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Congenital Dyserythropoietic Anemia: A Report from the Pediatric Transplant and Cellular Therapy Consortium.

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the sole curative option for congenital dyserythropoietic anemia (CDA), a rare type of hemolytic anemia characterized by anemia, ineffective erythropoiesis, and secondary hemochromatosis. In this retrospective multicenter study, we report the outcomes of children with CDA who underwent HCT at participating Pediatric Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Consortium centers. Clinical information on HCT and associated outcomes was collected retrospectively using a common questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and appropriate analysis. Eighteen patients with CDA who underwent allogeneic HCT between 2002 and 2020 were identified. The majority of patients (n = 13) had CDA type II, and the remainder had either CDA type I (n = 2) or CDA of unknown type (n = 3). Mutations were identified in 7 patients (39%), including SEC23B in 5, GATA1 in 1, and abnormality of chromosome 20 in 1. Thirteen patients had evidence of iron overload pre-HCT and received chelation therapy for a median duration of 10 months (range, 2 months to 17 years) pre-HCT. The median age at the time of HCT was 5.5 years (range, 0.7 to 26 years). Donors were HLA-matched (sibling, 4; unrelated, 10) and mismatched (haploidentical, 1; unrelated, 3). Graft sources were bone marrow in 15 patients, umbilical cord blood in 2 patients, or both in 1 patient. Conditioning included busulfan-based myeloablative (67%), fludarabine-based reduced-intensity (27%), or nonmyeloablative (6%) regimens. Five patients developed veno-occlusive disease, and 4 had viral reactivation. The cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 33%, and that of chronic GVHD was 22%. Four patients (22%) experienced graft failure; all engrafted following either a second HCT (n = 2) or third HCT (n = 2) but sustained considerable morbidities (3 GVHD, 1 death, 2 viral reactivation). With a median follow-up of 3.2 years (range, 0.6 to 14 years)), the 2-year overall survival, event-free survival (EFS), and GVHD-free EFS were 88% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73% to 100%), 65% (95% CI, 45% to 92%), and 60% (95% CI, 40% to 88%), respectively. Univariate analysis did not identify any patient- or transplantation-related variables impacting outcomes. Our study indicates that HCT can be curative for patients with CDA. Strategies such as aggressive chelation, use of preconditioning therapy, and early HCT in the presence of a suitable donor before comorbidities occur are needed to improve engraftment without increasing the risk for toxicity and mortality.

A study assessing the feasibility of randomization of pediatric and young adult patients between matched unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation and immune-suppressive therapy for newly diagnosed severe aplastic anemia: A joint pilot trial of the North American Pediatric Aplastic Anemia Consortium and the Pediatric Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Consortium.

BACKGROUND: Recent data show survival after matched unrelated donor (MUD) bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is similar to matched sibling procedures for young patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA). Donor delays, risk of transplant-related mortality (TRM), and concern about chronic graft versus host disease raise questions about whether MUD BMT or immune suppression therapy (IST) should be preferred initial therapy for young patients lacking matched sibling donors. PROCEDURE: We performed a pilot trial to assess the feasibility of randomizing patients under age 26 with newly diagnosed SAA to receive IST versus MUD BMT. Primary aims assessed the acceptability of randomization and timing of BMT. Secondary aims measured toxicities, response, and survival. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients with possible SAA were screened at nine centers. Of 57 with confirmed SAA, 23 underwent randomization and received therapy with a median follow-up of 18 months. Of 12 randomized to BMT, 10 started BMT as initial therapy at a median of 36 days after randomization. One BMT recipient experienced secondary graft failure, requiring a second procedure. Six of 11 randomized to IST responded, whereas five with refractory disease underwent successful salvage BMT. One patient achieving complete response relapsed after discontinuation of immune suppression and died of infection after salvage BMT. CONCLUSIONS: This feasibility study showed that a high percentage of patients underwent randomization and received up-front MUD BMT. Our study lays the groundwork for a larger randomized trial that will define best initial therapy for young patients with SAA who have an available MUD.

Primary Immune Deficiency Treatment Consortium (PIDTC) report.

The Primary Immune Deficiency Treatment Consortium (PIDTC) is a network of 33 centers in North America that study the treatment of rare and severe primary immunodeficiency diseases. Current protocols address the natural history of patients treated for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID), Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome, and chronic granulomatous disease through retrospective, prospective, and cross-sectional studies. The PIDTC additionally seeks to encourage training of junior investigators, establish partnerships with European and other International colleagues, work with patient advocacy groups to promote community awareness, and conduct pilot demonstration projects. Future goals include the conduct of prospective treatment studies to determine optimal therapies for primary immunodeficiency diseases. To date, the PIDTC has funded 2 pilot projects: newborn screening for SCID in Navajo Native Americans and B-cell reconstitution in patients with SCID after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Ten junior investigators have received grant awards. The PIDTC Annual Scientific Workshop has brought together consortium members, outside speakers, patient advocacy groups, and young investigators and trainees to report progress of the protocols and discuss common interests and goals, including new scientific developments and future directions of clinical research. Here we report the progress of the PIDTC to date, highlights of the first 2 PIDTC workshops, and consideration of future consortium objectives.