Effect of increased potassium intake on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and subcutaneous resistance arteries: a randomized crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Increased potassium intake lowers blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive patients. The underlying mechanism is not fully understood but must be complex because increased potassium intake elevates circulating concentrations of the BP-raising hormone aldosterone. METHODS: In a randomized placebo-controlled crossover study in 25 normotensive men, we investigated the effect of 4 weeks of potassium supplement (90 mmol/day) compared with 4 weeks of placebo on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), urine composition and 24-h ambulatory BP. Vascular function was also assessed through wire myograph experiments on subcutaneous resistance arteries from gluteal fat biopsies. RESULTS: Higher potassium intake increased urinary potassium excretion (144.7 ± 28.7 versus 67.5 ± 25.5 mmol/24-h; P < 0.0001) and plasma concentrations of potassium (4.3 ± 0.2 versus 4.0 ± 0.2 mmol/L; P = 0.0002), renin {mean 16 [95% confidence interval (CI) 12-23] versus 11 [5-16] mIU/L; P = 0.0047}, angiotensin II [mean 10.0 (95% CI 6.2-13.0) versus 6.1 (4.0-10.0) pmol/L; P = 0.0025] and aldosterone [mean 440 (95% CI 336-521) versus 237 (173-386) pmol/L; P < 0.0001]. Despite RAAS activation, systolic BP (117.6 ± 5.8 versus 118.2 ± 5.2 mmHg; P = 0.48) and diastolic BP (70.8 ± 6.2 versus 70.8 ± 6.3 mmHg; P = 0.97) were unchanged. In the wire myograph experiments, higher potassium intake did not affect endothelial function as assessed by acetylcholine [logarithmically transformed half maximal effective concentration (pEC50): 7.66 ± 0.95 versus 7.59 ± 0.85; P = 0.86] and substance P (pEC50: 8.42 ± 0.77 versus 8.41 ± 0.89; P = 0.97) or vascular smooth muscle cell reactivity as assessed by angiotensin II (pEC50: 9.01 ± 0.86 versus 9.02 ± 0.59; P = 0.93) and sodium nitroprusside (pEC50: 7.85 ± 1.07 versus 8.25 ± 1.32; P = 0.25) but attenuated the vasodilatory response of retigabine (pEC50: 7.47 ± 1.16 versus 8.14 ± 0.90; P = 0.0084), an activator of Kv7 channels. CONCLUSIONS: Four weeks of increased potassium intake activates the RAAS in normotensive men without changing BP and this is not explained by improved vasodilatory responses ex vivo.

Effects of additional vasodilatory or nonvasodilatory treatment on renal function, vascular resistance and oxygenation in chronic kidney disease: a randomized clinical trial.

AIM: Progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) may be accelerated by tissue hypoxia due to impaired blood supply. This could be induced by small artery narrowing resulting in abnormally high intrarenal vascular resistance (RVR). We investigated whether a reduction in RVR achieved by adding vasodilating medical therapy (AVT) is superior to adding nonvasodilating medical therapy (AnonVT) regarding tissue oxygenation and preservation of kidney function. METHODS: Eighty-three grade 3 and 4 CKD patients [estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) 34.6 ml/min per 1.73 m] were randomized to either AVT with amlodipine and/or renin angiotensin blockade or AnonVT with the nonvasodilating beta-blocker metoprolol. Investigations were performed at baseline and after 18 months of therapy. Systemic vasodilation was documented in the forearm vasculature using resting venous occlusion plethysmography. GFR was measured as Chrome-EDTA plasma clearance. Using MRI, renal artery blood flow was measured for calculation of RVR and for estimating renal oxygenation (R2*). RESULTS: AVT and AnonVT achieved as planned similar blood pressure levels throughout the study. At follow-up, resistance had decreased by 7% (P < 0.05) and RVR by 12% (P < 0.05) in the AVT group, whereas in the AnonVT group, resistance increased by 39% (P < 0.01), whereas RVR remained unchanged. At follow-up, no significant differences in cortical or medullary R2* values between AVT and AnonVT were observed, and the GFR decline was similar in the two groups (3.0 vs. 3.3 ml/min per 1.73 m). CONCLUSION: Long-term intensified vasodilation treatment reduced peripheral and RVR, but this was not associated with improvement of R2* or protection against loss of kidney function in CKD patients.

Renal denervation in treatment-resistant essential hypertension. A randomized, SHAM-controlled, double-blinded 24-h blood pressure-based trial.

BACKGROUND: Renal denervation (RDN), treating resistant hypertension, has, in open trial design, been shown to lower blood pressure (BP) dramatically, but this was primarily with respect to office BP. METHOD: We conducted a SHAM-controlled, double-blind, randomized, single-center trial to establish efficacy data based on 24-h ambulatory BP measurements (ABPM). Inclusion criteria were daytime systolic ABPM at least 145 mmHg following 1 month of stable medication and 2 weeks of compliance registration. All RDN procedures were carried out by an experienced operator using the unipolar Medtronic Flex catheter (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, California, USA). RESULTS: We randomized 69 patients with treatment-resistant hypertension to RDN (n = 36) or SHAM (n = 33). Groups were well balanced at baseline. Mean baseline daytime systolic ABPM was 159 ±â€Š12 mmHg (RDN) and 159 ±â€Š14 mmHg (SHAM). Groups had similar reductions in daytime systolic ABPM compared with baseline at 3 months [-6.2 ±â€Š18.8 mmHg (RDN) vs. -6.0 ±â€Š13.5 mmHg (SHAM)] and at 6 months [-6.1 ±â€Š18.9 mmHg (RDN) vs. -4.3 ±â€Š15.1 mmHg (SHAM)]. Mean usage of antihypertensive medication (daily defined doses) at 3 months was equal [6.8 ±â€Š2.7 (RDN) vs. 7.0 ±â€Š2.5 (SHAM)].RDN performed at a single center and by a high-volume operator reduced ABPM to the same level as SHAM treatment and thus confirms the result of the HTN3 trial. CONCLUSION: Further, clinical use of RDN for treatment of resistant hypertension should await positive results from double-blinded, SHAM-controlled trials with multipolar ablation catheters or novel denervation techniques.

Renal resistance and long-term blood pressure in individuals genetically predisposed for essential hypertension: 10-year follow-up of the Danish Hypertension Prevention Project.

AIM: Young individuals genetically predisposed for essential hypertension have increased renal vascular resistance. We evaluated whether 1 year of angiotensin II receptor blockade decreases afferent arteriolar resistance (RA) and induces a sustained blood pressure (BP) reduction during a 10-year follow-up period in offspring of parents both diagnosed with essential hypertension. METHODS: Based on renal plasma flow (p-aminohippurate clearance) and glomerular filtration rate (Cr-EDTA clearance) RA was calculated according to the model originally established by Gomez. Following baseline measurements, the participants (n = 110, mean age 30 years) were randomly allocated to 12 months of treatment with either candesartan or placebo followed by repetition of measurements and withdrawal of medication. Four-hour ambulatory BP (ABP) was recorded at baseline, by end of active treatment and after 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 years. ABP was analyzed according to RA achieved at the end of active treatment. RESULTS: Candesartan reduced RA by 14% (P < 0.01). Ten years posttreatment systolic ABP increased by 2.1 mmHg (P = 0.04) and diastolic by 4.2 mmHg (P < 0.01) compared with baseline, without any difference between treatment arms. A high posttreatment RA was associated with higher BP levels during follow-up, but long-term alterations in 24-h BP were similar in participants with low and high RA and not different between treatment arms. CONCLUSION: RA is associated with 24-h BP levels, but temporary lowering of BP and RA by candesartan does not prevent BP from increasing further. Prevention of hypertension appears not feasible by short-term inhibition of the rennin-angiotensin system in young adults.