Building and implementing an institutional registry for a data-driven national neurosurgical practice: experience from a multisite medical center.

In an era when healthcare "value" remains a much-emphasized concept, measuring and reporting the quality of neurosurgical care and costs remains a challenge for large multisite health systems. Ensuring cohesion in outcomes across multiple sites is important to the development of a holistic competitive marketing strategy that seeks to promote "brand" performance characterized by a superior quality of patient care. This requires mechanisms for data collection and development of a single uniform outcomes measurement system site wide. Operationalizing a true multidisciplinary effort in this space requires intersection of a vast array of information technology and administrative resources along with the neurosurgeons who provide subject-matter expertise relevant to patient care. To measure neurosurgical quality and safety as well as improve payor contract negotiations, a practice analytics dashboard was created to allow summary visualization of operational indicators such as case volumes, quality outcomes, and relative value units and financial indicators such as total hospital costs and charges in order to provide a comprehensive overview of the "value" of surgical care. The current version of the dashboard summarizes these metrics by site, surgeon, and procedure for nearly 30,000 neurosurgical procedures that have been logged into the Mayo Clinic Enterprise Neurosurgery Registry since transition to the Epic electronic health record (EHR) system. In this article, the authors sought to review their experience in launching this EHR-linked data-driven neurosurgical practice initiative across a large, national multisite academic medical center.

Association Between Vitamin D Deficiency and Outcomes Following Spinal Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Vitamin D deficiency is a relatively common occurrence in patients presenting for spinal surgery; however, whether this abnormality has any effect on spinal fusion outcomes remains unclear. We performed a systematic review of the available literature relevant to the association between vitamin D deficiency and spinal fusion outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a systematic and critical review of recent literature following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The following databases were searched: MEDLINE/PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus. Key search terms were "vitamin D," "spinal surgery outcomes," "spinal fusion," and "pseudarthrosis." Papers included in the review were original research articles in peer-reviewed journals. The articles were thoroughly examined and compared on the basis of study design, outcomes, and results. RESULTS: A total of 5 studies were included in the qualitative analysis. In these studies, patients presenting with vitamin D deficiency achieved lower fusion rates and suffered higher rates of recurrent-persistent low back pain compared with patients with normal vitamin D levels. Studies examining the effect of postoperative vitamin D supplementation in deficient patients reported significant improvements in low back pain intensity, patient-reported outcomes scores, and fusion rates compared with baseline as well as with control groups. CONCLUSIONS: The literature suggests that patients presenting for spinal fusion may benefit from correction of vitamin D deficiency to maximize the chance of a successful arthrodesis and to achieve optimal surgical outcomes. Future prospective studies are needed to determine whether routine preoperative treatment of this metabolic derangement is warranted.

Renal osteodystrophy: neurosurgical considerations and challenges.

BACKGROUND: Dialysis-associated destructive spondyloarthropathy (DSA) is the major bony complication of end-stage renal disease, most commonly found in the lower cervical region. The risk factors for developing dialysis-associated DSA include duration of hemodialysis and patient age. Patients with DSA have a higher incidence of osteoporosis and poor bone mineral density, which may place them at greater risk of atraumatic fractures, instrumentation failure, and neurologic compromise. METHODS: We describe a case of cervical radiculopathy due to dialysis-associated DSA atraumatic vertebral body fractures with a postoperative course that was complicated by instrumentation failure. We reviewed the literature regarding all 138 published cases, presenting the complications, surgical treatment options, and outcomes. RESULTS: A 44-year-old dialysis-dependent man presented with acute neck pain, radiculopathy, and weakness due to atraumatic fracture of C5 and C6 vertebral bodies. He underwent anterior C5 and C6 corpectomies, reconstruction with mesh cage and plate, and supplemental posterior instrumentation (C4-T1). Six weeks later, a computed tomography scan revealed anterior translation across the instrumented area with failure of the posterior instrumentation. He subsequently underwent traction, revision reinstrumentation from C2 to T5, and placement of external halo ring/jacket for 6 months. At 18 months later, he remains ambulatory without evidence of construct failure. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with renal osteodystrophy present a challenge for the spine surgeon due to compromised bone density. Hardware failure at the bone-construct interface is common in these patients, with revision surgery needed in 22% of published cases. Longer constructs with circumferential instrumentation and halo immobilization may minimize the risk of pseudoarthrosis and construct pull-out.