Impact of biological therapy in reducing the risk of arthritis development in inflammatory bowel diseases.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate spondyloarthritis (SpA) incidence in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) between patients treated with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and conventional DMARDs (cDMARDs) and define risk factors associated with SpA development. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) and divided into two cohorts: cDMARDs or bDMARDs/targeted synthetic (ts) DMARDs treated patients. Rheumatological assessment was performed in patients presenting musculoskeletal symptoms. Multivariate analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to evaluate the adjusted SpA risk development. RESULTS: 507 patients were included in the study. 176 patients with CD received bDMARDs, 112 cDMARDs and 106 new SpA diagnosies were formulated. Females (OR 1.7 (95% CI 1.1 to 3), adjusted p=0.04), non-stricturing/non-penetrating phenotype (OR 2 (95% CI 1.1 to 3.4), adjusted p=0.01), psoriasis (OR 2.1 (95% CI 1 to 4.6), adjusted p=0.04) and non-infectious uveitis (OR 6.8 (95% CI 1.4 to 33.4), adjusted p=0.01) were associated with increased SpA risk development, while bDMARDs usage was protective (OR 0.4 (95% CI 0.2 to 0.8), adjusted p=0.01), statistically higher than cDMARDs throughout the entire follow-up (effect size 0.47). 98 patients with UC received b-tsDMARDs, 121 cDMARDs and 56 new SpA diagnoses were formulated. Females (OR 2.1 (95% CI 1 to 4.3), adjusted p=0.02) and psoriasis (OR 2.7 (95% CI 1 to 6.8), adjusted p=0.03) were associated with increased SpA risk development, while bDMARDs were protective for SpA development for up to 12 months of treatment compared with cDMARDs (p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: bDMARDs treatment had an impact in reducing SpA development and clinical associated risk factors to transition from IBD to IBD-SpA emerged.

Niclosamide Enema for Active Distal Ulcerative Colitis: A Phase 1, Open-Label Study.

BACKGROUND: Oral and rectal formulations of 5-aminosalicylic acid are the first-line therapy for mild-to-moderate, distal ulcerative colitis (UC), but such a treatment is not effective in one-third of patients. Niclosamide is a small molecule, developed and approved as an orally administered drug to treat helminthic infections, with an excellent safety profile. Preclinical work showed that niclosamide is an anti-inflammatory agent, thereby providing the rationale to explore its safety and efficacy in patients with UC. This phase 1, open-label trial was aimed at assessing the safety of niclosamide formulated as an enema in patients with mild-to-moderate, distal UC, who relapsed on maintenance therapy with oral and/or rectal 5-aminosalicylic acid. METHODS: Seventeen patients with active UC received niclosamide enema (150 mg/60 mL) twice a day for 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was the safety of niclosamide treatment. Secondary endpoints included clinical remission and improvements in endoscopic Mayo/histologic scores. Endoscopic remission percentages exclude participants meeting criteria at baseline for endoscopic remission. RESULTS: Niclosamide was well tolerated by all 17 patients that were enrolled and treated. No serious adverse event was registered. Fifteen mild adverse events were registered in 6 patients and considered to be unrelated to the treatment. Clinical remission was achieved in 10 (59%) of 17 patients. Improvements of endoscopic Mayo score and histologic Geboes score were seen in 7 (58%) of 12 and 7 (41.2%) of 17 patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Niclosamide enema treatment is safe and well tolerated. Niclosamide improves clinical symptoms and endoscopic/histologic signs of UC; however, appropriately designed placebo-controlled clinical trials are required to confirm efficacy.

Ultrasonography Tight Control and Monitoring in Crohn's Disease During Different Biological Therapies: A Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Bowel ultrasonography (BUS) is a noninvasive tool for evaluating bowel activity in Crohn's disease (CD) patients. Aim of our multicenter study was to assess whether BUS helps to monitor intestinal activity improvement/resolution following different biological therapies. METHODS: Adult CD patients were prospectively enrolled at 16 sites in Italy. Changes in BUS parameters [i.e. bowel wall thickening (BWT), lesion length, echo pattern, blood flow changes and transmural healing (TH: normalization of all BUS parameters)] were analyzed at baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 months of different biological therapies. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-eight out of 201 CD patients were enrolled and analyzed (116 males [62%]; median age 36 years). Fifty-five percent of patients were treated with adalimumab, 16% with infliximab, 13% with vedolizumab and 16% with ustekinumab. TH rates at 12 months were 27.5% with an NNT of 3.6. TH at 12 months after adalimumab was 26.8%, 37% after infliximab, 27.2% after vedolizumab and 20% after ustekinumab. Mean BWT improvement from baseline was statistically significant at 3 and 12 months (P < .0001). Median Harvey-Bradshaw index, C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectin decreased after 12 months from baseline (P < .0001). Logistic regression analysis showed colonic lesion was associated with a higher risk of TH at 3 months and a greater BWT at baseline was associated with a lower risk of TH at 3 months [P = .03 (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.50-0.97)] and 12 months [P = .01 (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.89)]. At 3 months therapy optimization during the study was the only independent factor associated with a higher risk of no ultrasonographic response [P = .02 (OR 3.34, 95% CI 1.18-9.47)] and at 12 months disease duration [P = .02 (OR 3.03, 95% CI 1.15-7.94)]. CONCLUSIONS: Data indicate that BUS is useful to monitor biologics-induced bowel activity improvement/resolution in CD.

The impact of COVID-19 pandemic in the colorectal cancer prevention.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to a policy of severe restrictions in almost all countries strongly involved by the pandemic. National Health System is among activities suffering from the COVID-19 and the lockdown. AIM: To evaluate the impact of COVID-19 in colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention. METHODS: We report the change in the hospital organization to meet the growing healthcare needs determined by COVID-19. The limitations of CRC prevention secondary to COVID-19 and their effects on the healthcare are analyzed considering the features of the CRC screening programs in the average-risk population and endoscopic surveillance in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). RESULTS: The interruption of CRC prevention may lead to a delayed diagnosis of CRC, possibly in a more advanced stage. The economic burden and the impact on workload for gastroenterologists, surgeons, and oncologists will be greater as long as the CRC prevention remains suspended. To respond to the increased demand for colonoscopy once COVID-19 will be under control, we should optimize the resources. It will be necessary to stratify the CRC risk and reach an order of priority. It should be implemented the number of health workers, equipment, and spaces dedicated to performing colonoscopy for screening purpose and in subjects with alarm symptoms in the shortest time. To this aim, the funds earmarked for healthcare should be increased. CONCLUSION: The economic impact will be dramatic, but COVID-19 is the demonstration that healthcare has to be the primary goal of humans.

Antisense approach to inflammatory bowel disease: prospects and challenges.

Despite the great success of anti-tumour necrosis factor-based therapies, the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) still remains a challenge for clinicians, as these drugs are not effective in all patients, their efficacy may wane with time, and their use can increase the risk of adverse events and be associated with the development of new immune-mediated diseases. Therefore, new therapeutic targets are currently being investigated both in pre-clinical studies and in clinical trials. Among the technologies used to build new therapeutic compounds, the antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) approach is slowly gaining space in the field of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), and three ASOs have been investigated in clinical trials. Systemic administration of alicaforsen targeting intercellular adhesion molecule-1, a protein involved in the recruitment of leukocytes to inflamed intestine, was not effective in CD, even though the same compound was of benefit when given as an enema to UC patients. DIMS0150, targeting nuclear factor (NF) κB-p65, a transcription factor that promotes pro-inflammatory responses, was very promising in pre-clinical studies and is currently being tested in clinical trials. Oral mongersen, targeting Smad7, an intracellular protein that inhibits transforming growth factor (TGF)-ß1 activity, was safe and well tolerated by CD patients, and the results of a phase II clinical trial showed the efficacy of the drug in inducing clinical remission in patients with active disease. In this leading article, we review the rationale and the clinical data available regarding these three agents, and we discuss the challenge of using ASOs in IBD.

Treatment with biologic therapies and the risk of cancer in patients with IBD.

The proven involvement of cytokines in the pathophysiology of IBD has led to the development of powerful, selective, anticytokine drugs--so-called biologics--as a therapy for IBD. Although the efficacy of infliximab, a chimeric monoclonal IgG1 antibody directed against tumor necrosis factor, is proven and the use of biologic agents is growing worldwide, there is concern about their long-term safety, which includes the risk of developing cancer. An increased risk of malignancies, particularly lymphoma, has been reported in some studies of infliximab-treated patients with IBD; however, the increased risk could be caused by the underlying chronic disease, severity of the disease, concomitant medications (e.g. conventional immunomodulators), infliximab itself, or all of these variables. At present, the data do not provide clear evidence for a causal association between infliximab and the increased cancer risk. In appropriately selected patients with severe, refractory Crohn's disease, the benefits of biologic therapy seem to outweigh the cancer risk. Multicenter, case-control studies in large populations, with a long-term follow-up are needed to define the outcome of patients with IBD treated with biologic therapies.

Crohn's disease: a comparative prospective study of transabdominal ultrasonography, small intestine contrast ultrasonography, and small bowel enema.

BACKGROUND: Small intestine contrast ultrasonography (SICUS), when performed after distention of the small bowel lumen with an iso-osmolar polyethylene glycol electrolyte-balanced solution, shows high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (97%) in detecting small bowel abnormalities in patients who have not received a diagnosis but in whom there is a suspicion of intestinal diseases. The diagnostic yield of SICUS remains to be established in detecting small bowel lesions in patients with proven Crohn's disease (CD) in comparison with transabdominal ultrasonography (TUS), and in relationship to the experience of the operator, using small bowel enema (SBE) as the "gold standard." AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of SICUS, when performed by a sonologist with 1 year of experience, and TUS, when performed by a sonologist with 10 years of experience, compared to SBE in the assessment of the site, extension, and stenosis of small intestinal lesions in CD patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 28 consecutive patients (men, 16; women, 12; age range, 21 to 60 yr) with a diagnosis of CD underwent TUS and SICUS, which were performed by 2 sonologists who were unaware of the radiologic findings, on the same day. SICUS was performed after the ingestion of 375 mL of a polyethylene glycol contrast solution. A standard SBE was performed on a different day by an expert radiologist who was unaware of the sonographic findings. RESULTS: Sensitivities in the detection of small bowel lesions were 96% for TUS and 100% for SICUS. Compared with SBE, SICUS detected the presence of 4 lesions in the jejunum that had been missed by TUS. The mean (+/-SD) extent of the ileal disease was 22 +/- 12.5 cm when measured during SBE, 14.5 +/- 8.6 cm when measured during TUS, and 19.5 +/- 12.5 cm when measured during SICUS [P = 0.05 (SICUS versus SBE)]. The correlation of the extension of the lesions between SICUS and SBE (r = 0.88) was better than that between TUS and SBE (r = 0.64). The sensitivities of TUS and SICUS in the detection of at least 1 stricture were 76% and 94%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity in assessing prestenotic dilatation were 50% and 100%, respectively, at TUS, and 100% and 90%, respectively, at SICUS. CONCLUSION: In inexperienced hands, SICUS is a more accurate technique for assessing CD lesions, and the accuracy is better than that of TUS performed by an expert sonologist. The use of SICUS, instead of SBE, could be indicated for the follow-up of patients with CD.