Beclomethasone dipropionate versus mesalazine in distal ulcerative colitis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study.

BACKGROUND: Topical beclomethasone diproprionate has shown efficacy in ulcerative colitis. AIM: To assess, in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study, the tolerability and safety of topical beclomethasone diproprionate (3mg) enema and foam versus mesalazine (2g) enema and foam in mild-moderate distal ulcerative colitis. PATIENTS: In 15 referral gastrointestinal units, 99 patients with distal ulcerative colitis were enrolled. This number was lower than planned according to the statistical analysis, due to a low recruitment rate. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to random preparations (beclomethasone diproprionate enema, beclomethasone diproprionate foam, mesalazine enema, mesalazine foam) once nightly for 8 weeks, with clinical and endoscopical assessment (Disease Activity Index score) at baseline (T0), 4 (T4) and 8 weeks (T8). Results were expressed as median and range (95% confidence interval). The efficacy was assessed by comparing the Disease Activity Index value at T4 and T8 by using the Student's t-test or the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: Efficacy was comparable in the beclomethasone diproprionate or mesalazine groups at both T4 and T8 (response at T4: beclomethasone diproprionate 78% [95% confidence interval 0.6-0.8] versus mesalazine 79% [95% confidence interval 0.6-0.8]; T8: beclomethasone diproprionate 84% [95% confidence interval 0.7-0.9] versus mesalazine 90% [95% confidence interval 0.7-1.0]; p=n.s.; remission at T4: beclomethasone diproprionate 24% [95% confidence interval 0.1-0.3] versus mesalazine 28% [95% confidence interval 0.1-0.3]; remission at T8: beclomethasone diproprionate 36% [95% confidence interval 0.2-0.5] versus mesalazine 52% [95% confidence interval 0.3-0.6]; p=n.s.). The Disease Activity Index lowered at T4 and T8 versus T0 in the four groups (T4 versus T0: beclomethasone diproprionate foam Disease Activity Index 2 versus 6 p<0.0001; beclomethasone diproprionate enema 4 versus 6, mesalazine enema 3 versus 6, mesalazine foam 3.5 versus 7, p<0.001 for all three groups; T8 versus T0: p<0.01). The Disease Activity Index lowered at T8 versus T4 in the beclomethasone diproprionate enema and foam (Disease Activity Index: 2 versus 4 and 1 versus 4, respectively; p<0.05) and in the mesalazine enema (Disease Activity Index: 1.5, range 0-4 versus 3, range 0-12; p<0.01), but not in the mesalazine foam group (Disease Activity Index: 1, range 0-9 versus 3.5, range 0-8; p=n.s.). The safety profile was favourable for all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Beclomethasone diproprionate and mesalazine enema and foam show a comparable tolerability and efficacy in mild active distal ulcerative colitis.

Once daily high dose probiotic therapy (VSL#3) for maintaining remission in recurrent or refractory pouchitis.

BACKGROUND: Ten to 15% of patients with pouchitis experience refractory or recurrent disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a single daily high dose probiotic preparation (VSL#3) in maintaining antibiotic induced remission, and quality of life (QOL), for one year in such patients. METHODS: Patients with pouchitis at least twice in the previous year or requiring continuous antibiotics, associated with a pouchitis disease activity index (PDAI) > or =7 (0 = perfect; 18 = worst), in whom remission was induced by four weeks of combined metronidazole and ciprofloxacin, were randomised to receive VSL#3 6 g or placebo once daily for one year or until relapse. Symptomatic, endoscopic, and histological evaluations were made before, and two and 12 months after randomisation or at the time of relapse. Remission was defined as a clinical PDAI < or =2 and endoscopic PDAI < or =1. Relapse was defined as an increased clinical PDAI score > or =2 and increased endoscopic PDAI score > or =3. QOL was assessed using the inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire (IBDQ). RESULTS: Thirty six patients were randomised: 20 to VSL#3 and 16 to placebo. Remission was maintained at one year in 17 patients (85%) on VSL#3 and in one patient (6%) on placebo (p<0.0001). The IBDQ score remained high in the VSL#3 group (p = 0.3) but deteriorated in the placebo group (p = 0.0005). CONCLUSION: The once daily high dose probiotic VSL#3 is effective in maintaining antibiotic introduced remission for at least a year in patients with recurrent or refractory pouchitis. This is associated with a high level of quality of life.

Four-week open-label trial of metronidazole and ciprofloxacin for the treatment of recurrent or refractory pouchitis.

BACKGROUND: Preliminary data suggest that short-term antibiotic therapy with a single drug is effective for the treatment of patients with pouchitis. However, some patients are resistant to treatment. AIM: To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of a prolonged course of a combination of two antibiotics in patients with refractory or recurrent pouchitis, as well as its impact on their quality of life. METHODS: Patients with active refractory or recurrent pouchitis were recruited. This was defined as both: (i) a history of pouchitis at least twice in the last 12 months or persistent pouchitis requiring continual intake of antibiotics; and (ii) a Pouchitis Disease Activity Index score 3 7 (best to worst pouchitis=0-18) at the beginning of therapy. Treatment consisted of a combination of metronidazole, 400 or 500 mg twice daily, and ciprofloxacin, 500 mg twice daily, for 28 days. Symptomatic, endoscopic and histological evaluations were undertaken before and after antibiotic therapy using the Pouchitis Disease Activity Index score. Remission was defined as a combination of a Pouchitis Disease Activity Index clinical score of

Oral versus combination mesalazine therapy in active ulcerative colitis: a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Oral and topical mesalazine formulations are effective in active ulcerative colitis, but little is known on the efficacy of combined treatment. AIM: To compare the efficacy of oral mesalazine vs. combined oral and topical mesalazine in mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Patients with mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis (Clinical Activity Index, CAI 4-12) were identified at 15 participating centres. They were randomized to receive either mesalazine 4 g orally plus placebo enema, or mesalazine 2 g orally plus mesalazine 2 g rectally as a liquid enema for 6 weeks. The rate of clinical remission (CAI < 4) or clinical remission/improvement (reduction of CAI of 50% from baseline) at 6 weeks and time to clinical remission/improvement were primary end-points; the rate of endoscopic remission was a secondary end-point. RESULTS: 67 patients were assigned to oral treatment and 63 to combined treatment. One patient in the oral group and 2 in the combined group discontinued the treatment due to adverse events. Following an intention-to-treat analysis, the rate of clinical remission was 82% for oral treatment and 87% for combined treatment (P=0.56); the mean time to remission 22.2 and 20.2 days, respectively (P=0.29); the rate of clinical remission/improvement and the rate of endoscopic remission were 85% and 91% (P=0.503) and 58% and 71% (P=0.21), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with mild active ulcerative colitis, mesalazine 4 g orally and 2 g orally plus 2 g enema are equally effective in inducing disease remission.

Antibiotic combination therapy in patients with chronic, treatment-resistant pouchitis.

BACKGROUND: Pouchitis is the major long-term complication after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. About 15% of patients have a chronic, treatment-resistant disease. AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of an antibiotic combination for chronic active, treatment-resistant pouchitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients were treated orally with rifaximin 1 g b.d. + ciprofloxacin 500 mg b.d. for 15 days. Symptoms assessment, endoscopic and histological evaluations were performed at screening and after 15 days using the Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (PDAI). Improvement was defined as a decrease of at least 3 points in PDAI score, and remission as a PDAI score of 0. Systemic absorption of rifaximin was determined by high performance liquid chromatography. Faecal samples were collected before and after antibiotic treatment for stool culture. RESULTS: Sixteen out of 18 patients (88.8%) either improved (n=10) or went into remission (n=6); the median PDAI scores before and after therapy were 11 (range 9-17) and 4 (range 0-16), respectively (P < 0.002). No side-effects were reported. Rifaximin plasma levels and urinary excretion were negligible, confirming its mainly topical activity. A significant decrease in total anaerobes and aerobes, enterococci, lactobacilli, bifidobacteria and bacteroides in faecal samples was observed, while the reduction in number of coliforms and Clostridium perfringens did not reach a statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of rifaximin and ciprofloxacin was effective in patients with active chronic, treatment-resistant pouchitis, suggesting the need, in these patients, for treatment using antibiotic agents with wide antibacterial spectrum of activity.

A new mesalazine gel enema in the treatment of left-sided ulcerative colitis: a randomized controlled multicentre trial.

BACKGROUND: A new mesalazine rectal gel preparation (without propellant gas) has been recently developed to improve topical treatment in distal ulcerative colitis. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy, safety and patient tolerability of mesalazine gel enema compared with mesalazine foam enema in the treatment of patients with acute left-sided ulcerative colitis. METHODS: In a randomized multicentre investigator-blind parallel group trial, 103 patients with mild to moderate left-sided colitis or proctosigmoiditis were randomly allocated to mesalazine 2 g gel enema (n = 50 evaluable patients) and mesalazine 2 g foam enema (n = 53 evaluable patients) for 4 weeks. Clinical symptoms, endoscopic and histological findings were assessed at entry, 2 and 4 weeks. Patients' evaluation of treatment tolerability and acceptability was assessed at 2 and 4 weeks. RESULTS: After 4 weeks of treatment, clinical remission was achieved by 76% of mesalazine gel enema-treated patients and 69% of patients treated with mesalazine foam enema (P = 0.608). Endoscopic remission rates at week 4 were 51 and 52% for the mesalazine gel and foam enemas, respectively (P = 0.925). Histological remission was achieved by 30% of patients in both groups. Patients reported that the new mesalazine gel preparation was significantly better tolerated than the foam enema. Patients in the foam group had significantly more difficulty in retention (25% vs. 6%, P < 0.05), abdominal bloating (50% vs. 26%, P < 0.005) and discomfort during administration (48% vs. 26%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The new mesalazine gel enema is efficacious and significantly better tolerated than the mesalazine foam enema.

Beclomethasone dipropionate enemas versus prednisolone sodium phosphate enemas in the treatment of distal ulcerative colitis.

AIM: To compare beclomethasone dipropionate 3 mg/60 mL enema (BDP) and prednisolone sodium phosphate 30 mg/60 mL enema (PP) once daily in patients with active distal ulcerative colitis. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-seven patients were enrolled in a multicentre, 4-week, randomized, double-blind trial. Patients were assessed at baseline, 2 and 4 weeks. RESULTS: Both treatment groups showed statistically significant improvement of clinical activity after 2 and 4 weeks. Endoscopy and biopsy showed a reduction in the activity score at the end of the treatment period in both groups. No statistically significant difference was observed between the two treatment groups. After 4 weeks, 29% of patients in the BDP group and 25% in the PP group were considered to be in clinical remission; an improvement was observed in 40% of patients on BDP and in 47% on PP. Mean morning plasma cortisol levels showed a slight but significant reduction in the PP group, while the ACTH test showed that neither drug interfered with the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis function. No significant changes were observed in the laboratory tests. Finally, there was a low incidence of adverse events in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that, in the topical treatment of active distal ulcerative colitis, BDP 3 mg enemas are as efficacious as PP 30 mg enemas, without interference with the HPA axis.

Long-term efficacy of bismuth carbomer enemas in patients with treatment-resistant chronic pouchitis.

BACKGROUND: Mucosal inflammation of the ileal pouch (pouchitis) is the major long-term complication after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Broad-spectrum antibiotics are the mainstay of treatment, however, 15% of patients with pouchitis have a chronic, treatment-resistant disease. AIM: To determine the safety and efficacy of bismuth carbomer enemas in achieving and maintaining remission in treatment-resistant chronic pouchitis. METHODS: Twelve patients with treatment-resistant chronic pouchitis were treated nightly for 45 days with enemas containing elemental bismuth complexed with carbomer. Diagnosis of pouchitis and response to treatment were evaluated with the Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (PDAI), which includes clinical, sigmoidoscopic and histological criteria. Serum bismuth concentrations were determined by atomic absorption. RESULTS: Ten of 12 patients (83%) went into remission, with a significant decrease of mean total PDAI score from 12 (range 9-15) to 6 (4-15) (P < 0.002), and were continued on bismuth carbomer enemas administered every third night for 12 months. Patients were monitored clinically, sigmoidoscopically and histologically every 2 months for evidence of recurrence (increase > or = 2 in the clinical symptom portion of the PDAI). Six of 10 patients (60%) were able to maintain remission throughout the 12-month trial; 4/10 had an exacerbation, two of which occurred soon after discontinuing daily treatment. Serum bismuth levels were negligible in all patients and no side-effects were registered. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that bismuth carbomer enemas are safe and effective in achieving and maintaining remission in patients with treatment-resistant chronic pouchitis.

Retrograde colonic spread of a new mesalazine rectal enema in patients with distal ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Rectal treatment with mesalazine enemas is the first-line therapy for distal ulcerative colitis. In order to improve the benefits of rectal therapy, a new 60 mL 5-ASA rectal gel enema preparation has been developed using a device which excludes direct contact of the inert propellant gas with the active drug. The purpose of the present study was to assess by scintigraphy the colonic distribution of this new mesalazine rectal gel enema. METHODS: Twelve patients with active ulcerative colitis were administered 4 g of the mesalazine rectal enema labelled with 100 MBq technetium sulphur colloid (99mTc-SC). Anterior scans of the abdomen were acquired at intervals for 4 h. Scans were analysed to evaluate the extent of retrograde flow and homogeneity of distribution of the radiolabelled enema in the rectum, sigmoid, descending and transverse colon. In addition, plasma levels of 5-ASA and Ac-5-ASA were measured for 6 h. RESULTS: All patients retained the entire rectal gel throughout the course of the study without reporting adverse events. In 11 out of 12 patients (92%) the gel had spread homogeneously beyond the sigmoid colon and had reached the upper limit of disease in all cases. The maximum spread (splenic flexure) was observed in 6 out of 12 patients (50%) within the first 2 h. The systemic absorption of mesalazine and its metabolite Ac-5-ASA was low. CONCLUSIONS: The new mesalazine enema represents an adequate alternative and a further technological improvement in the topical treatment of distal ulcerative colitis.

Effect of an enteric-coated fish-oil preparation on relapses in Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Patients with Crohn's disease may have periods of remission, interrupted by relapses. Because fish oil has antiinflammatory actions, it could reduce the frequency of relapses, but it is often poorly tolerated because of its unpleasant taste and gastrointestinal side effects. METHODS: We performed a one-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to investigate the effects of a new fish-oil preparation in the maintenance of remission in 78 patients with Crohn's disease who had a high risk of relapse. The patients received either nine fish-oil capsules containing a total of 2.7 g of n-3 fatty acids or nine placebo capsules daily. A special coating protected the capsules against gastric acidity for at least 30 minutes. RESULTS: Among the 39 patients in the fish-oil group, 11 (28 percent) had relapses, 4 dropped out because of diarrhea, and 1 withdrew for other reasons. In contrast, among the 39 patients in the placebo group, 27 (69 percent) had relapses, 1 dropped out because of diarrhea, and 1 withdrew for other reasons (difference in relapse rate, 41 percentage points; 95 percent confidence interval, 21 to 61; P < 0.001). After one year, 23 patients (59 percent) in the fish-oil group remained in remission, as compared with 10 (26 percent) in the placebo group (P = 0.003). Logistic-regression analysis indicated that only fish oil and not sex, age, previous surgery, duration of disease, or smoking status affected the likelihood of relapse (odds ratio for the placebo group as compared with the fish-oil group, 4.2; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.6 to 10.7). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with Crohn's disease in remission, a novel enteric-coated fish-oil preparation is effective in reducing the rate of relapse.

Effects of new fish oil derivative on fatty acid phospholipid-membrane pattern in a group of Crohn's disease patients.

Fish oil has been recently proposed as a possible effective treatment in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); however, a lot of annoying side effects (ie, belching, halitosis, diarrhea, etc) affect patient compliance. We carried out a study of patient tolerance in a group of Crohn's disease (CD) patients with a new fish oil derivative consisting of 500-mg capsules of eicosapentaenoic-docosahexaenoic (EPA 40%-DHA 20%), a free fatty acid mixture (Purepa), and we also evaluated its incorporation into phospholipids, both in plasma and in red cell membranes. Five groups of 10 CD patients in remission received nine Purepa capsules daily in four different preparations (A: uncoated, B: coated, pH 5.5; C: coated, pH 5.5, 60 min time release; D: coated, pH 6.9) and 12 x 1-g capsules daily of a triglyceride preparation (Max-EPA, EPA 18%-DHA 10%), respectively. We coated three of the four Purepa preparations in order to delay the release of contents in an attempt to minimize the side effects. After six weeks of treatment, the group taking Purepa capsules, coated, pH 5.5, 60 min time release (group C) showed the best incorporation of EPA and DHA in red blood cell phospholipid membranes (EPA from 0.2 to 4.4%, DHA from 3.7 to 6.3%), and no side effects were registered, whereas in all other groups side effects were experienced in 50% or more of subjects. This new preparation will make it possible to treat patients for long periods.

Short report: zinc sulphate supplementation corrects abnormal erythrocyte membrane long-chain fatty acid composition in patients with Crohn's disease.

Patients with Crohn's disease may become zinc-deficient and, in such patients, an altered metabolism of radiolabelled long-chain fatty acids has been reported. We have investigated the possible reversal by zinc supplementation of altered long-chain fatty acid profiles of red cells in Crohn's disease. Twenty patients with long-standing Crohn's disease in clinical remission received 200 mg of zinc sulphate daily for 6 weeks. Phospholipid fatty acid profiles of washed red cells were analysed before and after zinc treatment and compared to those of 20 unsupplemented healthy controls. Plasma zinc levels in Crohn's were 72 +/- 8 micrograms/dL before zinc treatment and increased to 114 +/- 10 micrograms/dl after the therapy. Prior to zinc supplementation, the percentage of palmitic, stearic and oleic acids was significantly higher in Crohn's disease, while linoleic, arachidonic and n-3 fatty acids were reduced in Crohn's disease compared to healthy controls. Zinc supplementation abolished these pre-treatment differences in red-cell long-chain fatty acid profiles but did not affect plasma fatty acid values. Further studies are needed to clarify whether these fatty acid changes can be related to the clinical course of the disease.

Better quality of therapy with 5-ASA colonic foam in active ulcerative colitis. A multicenter comparative trial with 5-ASA enema.

We evaluated the efficacy, tolerance, and acceptance of a new 5-ASA colonic foam versus 5-ASA liquid enema in the short-term treatment of active ulcerative colitis in a three-week prospective, randomized, investigator-blind study, enrolling 233 patients from 12 outpatient clinics in Italy. In arm 1 of the study, 117 patients with mild attacks received 2 g of 5-ASA as foam or enema at bedtime. In arm 2, 116 patients with moderate attacks were given 4 g of 5-ASA as foam or enema at bedtime. End points were defined as complete relief of symptoms, and endoscopic and histological evidence of remission or improvement. In patients with mild relapse, 34 of 63 (54%) treated with foam were in clinical remission after only 10 days compared with 17 of 51 (31%) treated with enemas (P < 0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference between foam (83%) and enema (74%) after three weeks. In patients with moderate relapse, a higher proportion of patients achieved complete clinical remission in the foam group (63%) compared with enema group (52%) after three weeks (difference 11%, 95% CI -7 to 29). No significant differences were observed in endoscopic and histological evaluation of colonic mucosa between treatment groups in either arm. 5-ASA foam was well tolerated. No unexpected adverse events were reported. Patient evaluation of therapy showed that foam was much better accepted than enema because foam was more comfortable, more practical, easier to retain, and interfered less with daily living.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Spread and distribution of 5-ASA colonic foam and 5-ASA enema in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Rectal treatment with enemas, foams, and suppositories is the most efficient method of delivering an adequate quantity of locally active drugs to the distal colon. In a pilot study carried out by colonoscopy in four patients, it was observed that 4 g 5-ASA in 20 ml foam spread up or beyond the splenic flexure and more extensively than 2 g 5-ASA in 10 ml foam. Therefore we have undertaken a study in order to compare by scintigraphy the colonic distribution of 4 g 5-ASA foam versus 4 g 5-ASA in 100 ml liquid enemas in 10 patients with ulcerative colitis using a crossover randomized design. Both preparations were labeled with 100 MBq [99mTc]sulfur colloid before administration. Anterior scans were taken at intervals for 4 hr. Activity, expressed as a percentage of total radioactivity, was measured in the rectum, sigmoid, descending, transverse, and ascending colon. Six patients had the same extent of spread with the two formulations; in three patients with foam and in one patient with enema a greater spread was observed. The foam reached the upper limit of disease in all cases, while enema failed in two cases. The maximum spread with foam was observed within 30 min in nine of 10 patients compared with seven of 10 after enema. Compared to enema, foam distributes more uniformly and seems to persist longer in the descending and sigmoid colon. The 5-ASA colonic foam shows some more favorable characteristics than enema for the local treatment of left-sided ulcerative colitis.

Optimum dosage of 5-aminosalicylic acid as rectal enemas in patients with active ulcerative colitis.

5-Aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), the active moiety of sulphasalazine (SASP), was given as a rectal enema to patients with mild to moderate distal ulcerative colitis to determine the minimum effective dosage. A double blind study was carried out using enemas containing 1, 2, or 4 g or 5-ASA or placebo for a one month treatment period. One hundred and thirteen patients with ulcerative colitis attending our outpatient clinic volunteered to participate. Clinical, sigmoidoscopic, and histological assessments were carried out at the beginning of the study and after 15 and 30 days of treatment. All patients who received 5-ASA enemas showed significantly better results than those who received a placebo enema (p less than 0.001) but no difference was detected among the patients receiving differing concentrations of 5-ASA. This study suggests that 1 g 5-ASA (in a 100 ml enema) is a sufficient dosage for patients with a mild to moderate attack of ulcerative colitis.

Role of rectal formulations: enemas.

Clinical experience with mesalazine enemas in the treatment of ulcerative colitis is reviewed. After rectal administration, plasma mesalazine levels remain low, and 15% of the administered dose is recovered in the urine. Enemas containing 2 and 4 g of mesalazine have been shown to be effective, safe, and well tolerated by patients with mild and moderate ulcerative colitis. Patients who cannot tolerate sulfasalazine and patients who do not respond to other treatments have been successfully treated with mesalazine enemas. Suppositories of mesalazine are more suitable for patients with disease confined to the distal region of the colon, whereas mesalazine enemas should be used in patients with more extensive disease. Mesalazine enemas have also been used for maintenance therapy in ulcerative colitis.

5-Aminosalicylic acid in patients with ulcerative colitis in remission: plasma levels after administration of a new rectal enema.

Plasma levels of total 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) were determined after a single administration of 2 g and 4 g 5-ASA enemas to 6 patients with ulcerative colitis. The mean plasma levels and AUC values confirmed that the active substance is poorly absorbed by rectal route.

5-Aminosalicylic acid as enemas or suppositories in distal ulcerative colitis?

Thirty-nine patients with documented active distal proctitis (less than 20 cm) received either 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) enemas (2 g in 100 ml) or suppositories 1 g b.i.d., in a controlled study. Twenty patients received enemas, while 19 patients received suppositories, for 30 days. No difference could be observed in terms of efficacy; however, it was the patients' opinion that treatment with suppositories was easier than that with enemas (p less than 0.01).