Oxidative stress in critical care and vitamins supplement therapy: "a beneficial care enhancing".

OBJECTIVE: Critical illnesses are a significant public health issue because of their high rate of mortality, the increasing use of the Intensive Care Units and the resulting healthcare cost that is about 80 billion of dollars per year. Their mortality is about 12% whereas sepsis mortality reaches 30-40%. The only instruments currently used against sepsis are early diagnosis and antibiotic therapies, but the mortality rate can also be decreased through an improvement of the patient's nutrition. The aim of this paper is to summarize the effects of vitamins A, B, C and E on the balance between pro-oxidants and anti-oxidants in the critical care setting to confirm "a beneficial care enhancing". MATERIALS AND METHODS: The peer-reviewed articles analyzed were selected from PubMed databases using the keywords "critical care", "intensive care", "critical illness", "sepsis", "nutritional deficiency", "vitamins", "oxidative stress", "infection", and "surgery". Among the 654 papers identified, 160 articles were selected after title and abstract examination, removal of duplicates and of the studies on pediatric population. Finally, only the 92 articles relating to vitamins A, C, E and the B complex were analyzed. RESULTS: The use of vitamins decreased morbidity and mortality in perioperative period and critically ill patients, especially in ICU. Among the most encouraging results, we found that the use of vitamins, both as monotherapy and in vitamins combinations, play a crucial role in the redox balance. Vitamins, especially vitamins A, C, E and the B complex, could help prevent oxidative damage through the breakdown of the oxidizing chemical chain reaction. CONCLUSIONS: Even if the results of the studies are sometimes discordant or inconclusive, the current opinion is that the supplementation of one or more of these vitamins in critically ill patients may improve their clinical outcome, positively affecting the morbidity and the mortality. Further, randomized studies are required to deeply understand the potentiality of a vitamin supplementation therapy and develop homogeneous and standardized protocols to be adopted in every critical care scenario.

Moxifloxacin-based strategies for first-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection.

BACKGROUND: Standard anti-Helicobacter pylori therapy may not achieve a satisfactory eradication rate. Fluoroquinolones, such as moxifloxacin, are safe and promising agents for H. pylori eradication. AIM: To compare the efficacy of two 1-week moxifloxacin-based H. pylori eradication regimens with two standard treatments. METHODS: Three hundred and twenty H. pylori-positive subjects were randomized into four groups to receive: moxifloxacin, amoxicillin, esomeprazole (Group MAE); moxifloxacin, tinidazole and esomeprazole (Group MTE); standard triple therapies with clarithromycin, amoxicillin and esomeprazole (Group CAE) or tinidazole (Group CTE) for 7 days. H. pylori status was re-assessed 6 weeks after the end of therapy by 13C urea breath test. RESULTS: Three hundred and twenty patients completed the efficacy analysis per protocol; H. pylori eradication rate in group MTE was 90% (72 of 80) and 92% (72 of 78), in group MAE was 88% (70 of 80) and 89%, (70 of 79) in Group CAE was 73% (58 of 80) and 78% (58 of 74), and in Group CTE was 75% (60 of 80) and 79% (60 of 76), respectively, in intention-to-treat and in per protocol analyses. Eradication rates of moxifloxacin-based triple therapies were significantly higher than that observed using standard triple schemes. The incidence of side effects was significantly lower in moxifloxacin groups than in control groups. CONCLUSIONS: Seven-day moxifloxacin-based triple therapies provide optimal eradication rates with a good compliance when compared with the standard triple therapy schemes.

Mono, dual and triple moxifloxacin-based therapies for Helicobacter pylori eradication.

BACKGROUND: Moxifloxacin is a broad spectrum fluoroquinolone with single daily administration, currently used, above all, for respiratory tract infections. AIM: To compare the efficacy of different 1-week moxifloxacin-based Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens. METHODS: One hundred and twenty H. pylori-positive subjects were randomized to receive moxifloxacin (400 mg/day), moxifloxacin (400 mg/day) and lansoprazole (30 mg/day) or moxifloxacin (400 mg/day), lansoprazole (30 mg/day) and clarithromycin (500 mg b.d.). H. pylori status was reassessed 6 weeks after the end of therapy, and both intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses were performed. RESULTS: One hundred and nineteen of the 120 patients completed the study. H. pylori eradication was achieved in 22.5% of patients treated with moxifloxacin, in 33.3% of subjects treated with moxifloxacin and lansoprazole and in 90% of patients treated with moxifloxacin, clarithromycin and lansoprazole. CONCLUSIONS: Mono and dual moxifloxacin-based therapies are not acceptable for H. pylori eradication; conversely, moxifloxacin-based triple therapy may be considered as a new, effective, first-line therapy option.

Effect of Lactobacillus GG supplementation on antibiotic-associated gastrointestinal side effects during Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: One-week triple therapy is currently regarded as the reference of anti-Helicobacter pylori treatment. However, antibiotic-associated gastrointestinal side effects are among the major pitfalls of such regimens. Probiotic supplementation may be regarded as a therapeutic tool to prevent or reduce these troublesome drug-related manifestations. AIM: To determine whether the addition of the probiotic Lactobacillus GG to an anti-H. pylori standard triple therapy could help to prevent or minimize the occurrence of gastrointestinal side effects. METHODS: One hundred and twenty healthy asymptomatic subjects screened positive for H. pylori infection and deciding to receive eradication therapy were randomized either to 1-week pantoprazole (40 mg b.i.d.), clarithromycin (500 mg b.i.d.), tinidazole (500 mg b.i.d.) or to the same regimen supplemented with Lactobacillus GG for 14 days. Patients filled in validated questionnaires during follow-up to determine the type and severity of side effects and to judge overall tolerability. RESULTS: Bloating, diarrhea and taste disturbances were the most frequent side effects during the eradication week and were significantly reduced in the Lactobacillus GG-supplemented group (RR = 0.4, CI 0.2-0.8; RR = 0.3, CI 0.1-0.8; RR = 0.3, CI 0.1-0.7, respectively). The same pattern was observed throughout the follow-up period. Overall assessment of treatment tolerability showed a significant trend in favor of the Lactobacillus GG-supplemented group (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Lactobacillus GG supplementation beneficially affects H. pylori therapy-related side effects and overall treatment tolerance.

The effect of oral administration of Lactobacillus GG on antibiotic-associated gastrointestinal side-effects during Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy.

BACKGROUND: One-week triple therapy is currently considered the golden standard against Helicobacter pylori. However, gastrointestinal side-effects are among the major pitfalls in such regimens. Probiotic supplementation might help to prevent or reduce such drug-related manifestations. AIM: To determine whether adding the probiotic Lactobacillus GG to an anti-H. pylori regimen could help to prevent or minimize the gastrointestinal side-effects burden. METHODS: Sixty healthy asymptomatic subjects screened positive for H. pylori infection were randomized to 1 week rabeprazole (20 mg b.d.), clarithromycin (500 mg b.d.), tinidazole (500 b.d.) and the probiotic Lactobacillus GG for 14 days or to the same regimen with a placebo preparation. Patients completed validated questionnaires during the week of treatment and during the following 3 weeks, to determine the type and severity of side-effects and an overall judgement of tolerability. RESULTS: Diarrhoea, nausea and taste disturbance were significantly reduced in the Lactobacillus GG supplemented group (relative risk=0.1, 95% CI: 0.1-0.9; relative risk=0.3, 95% CI: 0.1-0.9; relative risk=0.5, 95% CI: 0.2-0.9, respectively). An overall assessment of treatment tolerability showed a significant difference in favour of the Lactobacillus GG supplemented group (P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Lactobacillus GG supplementation showed a positive impact on H. pylori therapy-related side-effects and on overall treatment tolerability.