Community co-selection of measures to evaluate the health and wellbeing impact of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community running groups.

ISSUE ADDRESSED: Physical activity participation can improve the physical health and social and emotional wellbeing of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. The evaluation of physical activity programmes can elicit a clearer understanding of where these impacts occur and to what extent. We describe applying a collaborative approach to the selection of a set of measures that can be used to examine health and wellbeing impacts of Indigenous community running groups. METHODS: Physical activity, health and wellbeing measurement tools previously used with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples were collated. Participants in the collaborative process were nine female running group members aged 30+ years from a regional New South Wales (NSW) town. The Indigenous research method, Yarning, explored views of participating in the group on health and wellbeing and how these could be measured using those collated measurement tools. RESULTS: Runners described participating for holistic physical, mental and social reasons and stated the importance of the group participating together and providing social support to each other. There was broad support for the identified physical activity, lifestyle, physical health, and social and emotional wellbeing measures, with social networks and sports injuries identified as additionally relevant. CONCLUSIONS: Co-selecting measures to evaluate a physical activity programme for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander participants can better inform the development of relevant future healthy lifestyle programme evaluation, revealing factors that may be missed as relevant by researchers. SO WHAT?: This process presents an example of determining evaluation measures with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander participants that could be applied more broadly to evaluation design.

Importance of cardiac rehabilitation in rural and remote areas of Australia.

OBJECTIVE: To assess implementation of in-patient cardiac rehabilitation (Phase-1-cardiac rehabilitation), impact on people in rural and remote areas of Australia and potential methods for addressing identified weaknesses. DESIGN: Exploratory case study methodology using qualitative and quantitative methods. Qualitative data collection via semi-structured interviews, using thematic analysis, augmented by quantitative data collection via a medical record audit. SETTING: Four regional hospitals (2 Queensland Health and 2 private) providing tertiary health care. PARTICIPANTS: (a) Hospital in-patients with heart disease ≥18 years. (b) Staff responsible for their care. OUTCOME MEASURES: Implementation of Phase-1-cardiac rehabilitation in tertiary hosptials in North Queensland and the impact on in-patients discharge planning and post discharge care. Recommentations and implications for practice are proposed to address deficits. RESULTS: Phase-1-cardiac rehabilitation implementation rates, in-patient understanding and multidisciplinary team involvement were low. The highest rates of Phase-1-cardiac rehabilitation were for in-patients with a length of stay three days or more  in cardiac units with cardiac educators. Rates were lower in cardiac units with no cardiac educators, and lowest for in-patients in all areas of all hospitals with length of stay of two days or less days. Low Phase-1-cardiac rehabilitation implementation rates resulted in poor in-patient understanding about their disease, treatment and post-discharge care. Further, medical discharge summaries rarely mentioned cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention or risk factor management resulting in a lack of information for health care providers on cardiac rehabilitation and holistic health care. CONCLUSION: Implementation of Phase-1-cardiac rehabilitation in regional hospitals in this study fell short of recommended best practice, resulting in patients' poor preparation for discharge, and insufficient information on holistic care for health care providers in rural and remote areas. These factors potentially impact on holistic care for people returning home following treatment for heart disease.