RESUMEN
Chronic prostatitis is hard to be identified in BPH patients in clinical works. This study aimed to diagnose chronic prostatitis in BPH patients by noninvasive methods. BPH patients who received transurethral resection of prostate from January 2014 to July 2015 were enrolled in current study. Patients were received examinations of PSA, sex hormones, inflammatory cytokines, metabolic panel and transrectal ultrasonography. According to histological results, patients were divided into two group of BPH with/without prostatitis. Logistic regression was used to find risk factors of chronic prostatitis. As a result, 181 men with an average age of 72.15 ± 8.41 years were enrolled in this study, including 116 patients with prostatitis and 65 patients without prostatitis. The storage sub-score, PSA and IL-2R were significantly higher in patients with prostatitis than those without prostatitis. Based on logistic regression analysis, the above three parameters were also the risk factors of BPH with prostatitis. The diagnostic model was calculated as: 0.317 × storage sub-score + 0.092 × PSA + 0.003 × IL-2R - 4.296. The AUC was 0.725. Histological prostatitis in BPH patients can be diagnosed by the combination of serum IL-2R, PSA and storage sub-score. Identification of chronic prostatitis in BPH patients could more efficiently alleviate urinary symptoms and reduce the risk of disease progression.
Asunto(s)
Hiperplasia Prostática , Prostatitis , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , China/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Hiperplasia Prostática/diagnóstico , Prostatitis/diagnósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sepsis is the most common critical illness in the clinic, with a high incidence and mortality. Qingwen Baidu decoction (QWBDD) has been widely applied in the treatment of sepsis, however, there is no systematic review or meta-analysis of QWBDD in the treatment of sepsis. Hence, we provide a protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of QWBDD in the treatment of sepsis. METHODS: The databases including Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Clinical Trial Database, World Health Organization International Clinical Trial Registration Platform, CNKI, CBM, VIP, and WanFang Database will be searched from the time when the respective databases were established to January 2019. All randomized controlled trials (RTCs) published in Chinese and English assessing QWBDD for sepsis will be included. Continuity data are expressed as mean difference (MD) or standard mean difference (SMD), and dichotomous data is expressed as relative risk. Analyses will be performed by using RevMan V.5.3.5 software. RESULTS: This study will provide high-quality synthesis of current evidence of QWBDD in the treatment of sepsis from the following aspects, including 28-day mortality, mean arterial pressure (MAP), blood lactate, procalcitonin (PCT), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), hypersensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), acute physiology and chronic health score (APACHE-II), intensive care unit stay, mean hospital stay, mechanical ventilation time, etc. CONCLUSION:: Our systematic review will provide evidence for judging whether QWBDD is an effective intervention for sepsis. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD 42019123078.
Asunto(s)
Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos/uso terapéutico , Proyectos de Investigación , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , APACHE , Presión Arterial , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos/administración & dosificación , Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Interleucina-6/sangre , Ácido Láctico/sangre , Tiempo de Internación , Polipéptido alfa Relacionado con Calcitonina/sangre , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Respiración Artificial , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/sangreRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Essential hypertension is one of the most common chronic diseases worldwide, as well as a leading risk factor for cardiocerebrovascular diseases. Zhengan Xifeng Decoction (ZGXFD) has been widely used to treat essential hypertension, but there is no systematic review by assessing efficacy and safety of ZGXFD on essential hypertension. Therefore, we aim to perform systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ZGXFD in the treatment of essential hypertension. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis will be performed by means of electronic databases, including EMBASE, Cochrane Center Registration Controlled trials (Cochrane Library), Web of Science (WOS), World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, PubMed, China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Scientific Journal Database (VIP), and Wan-fang database. The electronic databases will be searched from their inception to October 2018. This systemic review will include only published English and Chinese articles randomized controlled trials (RTCs) of ZGXFD on essential hypertension. The primary outcome is Efficacy and blood pressure (BP), blood lipid and adverse reactions will be accepted as secondary outcomes. All statistical analyses will be conducted using RevMan V.5.3.5 software. RESULTS: This systematic review and meta-analysis will provide high-quality evidence from several aspects, including for efficacy, blood pressure, blood lipid and adverse effects to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ZGXFD on EHTN. CONCLUSION: This systematic review will determine whether or not ZGXFD is an effective intervention for essential hypertension.