RESUMEN
The histo-blood group antigens P, P1 and Pk are a closely related set of glycosphingolipid structures expressed by red blood cells and other tissues. None of these three characters is expressed on p cells, a null phenotype that arises in the context of homozygous mutation of the A4GALT gene. Subjects with p phenotype spontaneously develop a natural alloantibody named anti-PP1Pk, which is a mixture of IgG and IgM against P1, P and Pk. While anti-P1 is a weak cold antibody with poor clinical significance, anti-P and anti-Pk antibodies are potent haemolysins responsible for severe hemolytic transfusion reactions. The rare anti-PP1Pk alloantibodies are associated with recurrent spontaneous abortion in the first trimester of gestation. P and Pk antigens are expressed at high levels on the placenta and antibodies directed against both these structures are deleterious to placental trophoblasts. Here we describe the use of plasma exchange (PEX) in a nulliparous 39-year-old woman with anti-PP1Pk antibodies and a history of repeated spontaneous early abortions and hypofertility. The patient underwent apheresis starting from the third week throughout the pregnancy and a healthy child was delivered by cesarean section at 35 WG. The newborn required only phototherapy within a few days of life. We can state that an early treatment with the only PEX has proven to be effective and safe in the management of a fetomaternal P-incompatibility caused by a high anti-PP1Pk titer (256).
Asunto(s)
Aborto Habitual , Anemia Hemolítica Autoinmune , Antígenos de Grupos Sanguíneos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Aborto Habitual/etiología , Aborto Habitual/terapia , Anemia Hemolítica Autoinmune/terapia , Cesárea/efectos adversos , Isoanticuerpos , Sistema del Grupo Sanguíneo P/genética , Placenta , Intercambio Plasmático/efectos adversos , Mujeres EmbarazadasRESUMEN
Renal transplantation is the definitive treatment for many metabolic abnormalities of uremic patients, although it is only partially effective for renal osteodystrophy, which may interact with posttransplant renal osteopathy. Osteopenic-osteoporotic syndrome represents, together with fractures secondary to osteoporosis and osteonecrosis, the bone complication most related to renal transplantation. Several factors contribute to the pathogenesis of posttransplantation osteoporosis, particularly immunosuppressive treatment. In this study, we evaluated the prevalence of factors related to posttransplant renal osteopathy and the clinical impact of immunosuppressive protocols. We studied 24 renal transplant recipients with hypercalcemia. Glomerular filtration rate was >50 mL/min. Mean age, time on dialysis, and time from transplantation were 49.6, 5.4, and 6.9 years, respectively. We evaluated serum and urine calcium and phosphorus, calcitonin, parathormone, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, urine deoxypyridinoline, telopeptide of type 1 procollagen, 1,25-(OH)(2) and 25-OH vitamin D, parathyroid ultrasound, and computerized bone mineralometry. The combination of sirolimus and steroids resulted in the most disadvantageous outcomes regarding alkaline phosphatase and mineralometry. Calcineurin inhibitors did not significantly influence bone metabolism markers; mycophenolate mofetil evidenced no effect on bone. According to the literature, steroids account for the abnormalities found in our patients and in severe osteopenia. Several factors may contribute to the development of osteoporosis and fractures in transplantation patients, although they are overcome by the prominent effect of steroids. In patients at high risk of osteoporosis, steroid-free therapy should be considered. Everolimus is indicated for diseases with bone loss. Combined therapy with everolimus and mycophenolic acid without cyclosporine and steroids, seemed to be particularly indicated. Prophylactic treatments should be commenced early. No single marker was useful to diagnose posttransplant renal osteopathy. The definitive diagnosis should be made by bone biopsy during transplantation, and noninvasive procedures, such as densitometry and evaluation of biologic markers, may be useful during follow-up.