The relationship of depression, alcohol and marijuana with treatment for LUTS/BPH.

INTRODUCTION: Despite widespread usage, research on the relationship of marijuana use to disease is sorely lacking. We sought to test the relationship of LUTS/BPH treatment and endocannabinoid agonist usage, as well as alcohol usage and depression, with treatment for LUTS/BPH in our health system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We queried our hospital system database of nearly three million patients in a marijuana-legalized region for data from the electronic medical record between January 2011 and October 2018. Men over the age of 45 on medical therapy for LUTS (selective alpha blockade and/or finasteride) were included. Exclusions were diagnosis of bladder or prostate malignancy and men with only one visit. Alcohol and marijuana (MJ) use were found from diagnosis code and/or social history text. Medical diagnoses were based on ICD-9/10 codes. Multiple logistic regression was used to control for confounders. We considered all men over the age of 45 who had any of these features: depression, obesity or metabolic syndrome (MetS), hypertension (HTN), erectile dysfunction (ED), hypogonadism, diabetes (DM) and calculated the odds ratio of also receiving medical therapy for LUTS. Univariable and multivariable analyses were employed, multiple logistic regression was used to control for confounders. RESULTS: A total of 173,469 patients were identified meeting criteria with 20,548 (11.9%) on medical treatment for LUTS. After adjusting for confounding variables, MJ and depression remained associated with an increased risk of LUTS medication, within the context of verifying previously established relationships of ED, Obesity/MetS, DM, HTN and hypogonadism. CONCLUSIONS: Men with depression and MJ usage were more likely to be treated for LUTS/BPH in our system. Better understanding of the causality of this relationship and potential interaction of LUTS/BPH with the endocannabinoid system is desirable.

Hepatic Ablation Promotes Colon Cancer Metastases in an Immunocompetent Murine Model.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of radiofrequency (RF) and microwave (MW) energy compared to direct cautery on metatstatic colon cancer growth. BACKGROUND: Hepatic ablation with MW and RF energy creates a temperature gradient around a target site with temperatures known to create tissue injury and cell death. In contrast, direct heat application (cautery) vaporizes tissue with a higher site temperature but reduced heat gradient on surrounding tissue. We hypothesize that different energy devices create variable zones of sublethal injury that may promote tumor recurrence. To test this hypothesis we applied MW, RF, and cautery to normal murine liver with a concomitant metastatic colon cancer challenge. METHODS: C57/Bl6 mice received hepatic thermal injury with MW, RF, or cautery to create a superficial 3-mm lesion immediately after intrasplenic injection of 50K MC38 colon cancer cells. Thermal imaging recorded tissue temperature during ablation and for 10 seconds after energy cessation. Hepatic tumor location and volume was determined at day 7. RESULTS: Cautery demonstrated the highest maximum tissue temperatures (129°C) with more rapid return to baseline compared to MW or RF energy. All mice had metastasis at the ablation site. Mean tumor volume was significantly greater in the MW (95.3 mm; P = 0.007) and RF (55.7 mm; P = 0.015) than cautery (7.13 mm). There was no difference in volume between MW and RF energy (P = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic thermal ablation promotes colon cancer metastasis at the injury site. MV and RF energy result in greater metastatic volume than cautery. These data suggest that the method of energy delivery promotes local metastasis.