Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Br J Haematol ; 198(5): 903-911, 2022 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35768889

RESUMEN

Regular transfusion and chelation therapy produces increased life expectancy in thalassaemic patients who may develop new complications. Since few data are available regarding hypercalciuria in ß-thalassaemia major (TM), the aim of our study was to evaluate its prevalence, risk factors and clinical consequences. We enrolled 176 adult TM patients followed at the Center of Thalassemia of Ferrara. Hypercalciuria was defined by a calciuria of 4 mg/kg/day or more in a 24-h urine sample. Anamnestic, biochemical and radiological data were collected. Hypercalciuria prevalence was reported in 69.3% of patients (females 52.5%). Hypercalciuric (HC) patients used deferasirox (DFX) more often than normocalciuric (NC) patients (47.5% vs 29.6%; p < 0.05). In HC subjects plasma parathyroid hormone (PTH) (24.1 ± 10.4 vs 30.1 ± 13.2 pg/ml) and phosphate levels (3.6 ± 0.5 vs 3.8 ± 0.7 mg/dl) were lower, whereas serum calcium (9.6 ± 0.4 vs 9.4 ± 0.4 mg/dl) and urinary 24-h phosphaturia (0.9 ± 0.4 vs 0.6 ± 0.3 g/day) were higher as compared to NC patients (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). Supplementation with oral calcium and cholecalciferol was similar between the groups. A higher rate of kidney stones was present in HC (14.8%) versus NC patients (3.7%) (p < 0.05). Hypercalciuria is a frequent complication in adequately treated adult TM patients. Hypercalciuria prevalence is increased in DFX users whereas haemoglobin level or calcium supplements play no role. A significant proportion of HC patients developed kidney stones.


Asunto(s)
Cálculos Renales , Talasemia beta , Adulto , Calcio , Femenino , Humanos , Hipercalciuria/epidemiología , Hipercalciuria/etiología , Hipercalciuria/orina , Cálculos Renales/orina , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Talasemia beta/complicaciones , Talasemia beta/tratamiento farmacológico
2.
Gland Surg ; 9(3): 859-866, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32775281

RESUMEN

Whilst surgery represents the gold standard for the treatment of adrenal primary malignant tumors, metastatic involvement of the adrenal glands is generally approached conservatively; however, surgery for local control has been controversial, and several reports have described the utility of surgical removal in terms of prolonged survival in selected patients. Different techniques, including radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), laser induced thermal therapy (LITT), cryoablation (CRA), and chemical ablation, are employed in percutaneous image-guided ablation for primary and metastatic malignancies of the adrenal glands, in case of patients with multiple comorbidities or who refuse surgery. Technical success, clinical success and safety were analysed and discussed in this systematic review. Tumor size was found a significant determinant for local disease control; histology of the primary malignancy and coexistence of tumor elsewhere were correlated with prognosis. These procedures resulted to be feasible and safe, with hypertensive crisis representing the most common complication. Although there is lack of evidence in the literature concerning outcomes compared with surgery, percutaneous ablation may represent a useful therapeutic option for controlling unresectable adrenal metastases, offering patients opportunities for improved survival.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA