Primary care for those with severe and persistent mental illness.

Historically, the medical care of persons with severe and persistent mental illness (SPMI) has been suboptimal. In many communities, large gaps exist in the continuum of services necessary to meet the medical needs of those patients, and existing services are not well coordinated. The effect of the managed mental health care on patients with SPMI remains to be seen, but it does not bode well for patients who are already at risk for being undertreated. We initiated primary care clinics exclusively for patients with SPMI because of our belief that integrating primary care and mental health services offers the best hope of improving health care for those patients. Our experience to date is instructive for other health care systems.

A phase I trial of a modified, dose intensive FAMTX regimen (high dose 5-fluorouracil+doxorubicin+high dose methotrexate+leucovorin) with oral uridine rescue.

BACKGROUND: Dose intensification of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is complicated by increased toxicity. 5-FU is a fluorine-substituted pyrimidine analog of uracil. In preclinical studies, administration of oral uridine (Ur) has been shown to allow for dose intensification of 5-FU with enhancement of its antitumor activity. Therefore, a Phase I trial was designed aimed at dose intensification of 5-FU as a component of a modified 5-FU-doxorubicin-methotrexate (FAMTX) regimen using oral Ur rescue. METHODS: Methotrexate (MTX) was administered to all patients at a fixed dose of 1.5 g/m2. MTX was followed 24 hours later by escalating doses of 5-FU starting at 800 mg/m2 with leucovorin rescue. Cycles of 5-FU and MTX were repeated every 15 days. Every other cycle, patients received doxorubicin. "Adria cycles") at a dose of 30 mg/m2. Oral Ur was administered at a dose of 8 gm/m2 every 6 hours for 12 doses. In the first phase of the study, patients received Ur only if they developed Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity. In the second phase, all patients received Ur 24 hours after 5-FU on all cycles. RESULTS: Without Ur rescue, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 5-FU was 900 mg/m2 on the Adria cycles and 1.1 gm/m2 on the non-Adria cycles. With Ur, the MTD of 5-FU increased to 1.2 gm/m2 on the Adria cycles and to 1.6 gm/m2 on the non-Adria cycles. CONCLUSIONS: In this modified FAMTX regimen, oral Ur administration allowed for dose-intensification of 5-FU, with a 33% increase in the MTD of 5-FU on the Adria cycles and a 45% increase in the MTD of 5-FU dose on the non-Adria cycles.

Lack of efficacy of high-dose leucovorin and fluorouracil in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Leucovorin potentiates the cytotoxicity of fluorouracil (5-FU) in experimental tumor systems and appears to enhance the effectiveness of 5-FU in patients with colon cancer. Twenty-two eligible patients (18 previously untreated) with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma were treated in a phase II trial of leucovorin 500 mg/m2/d for 6 days by continuous intravenous infusion with 5-FU 370 mg/m2/d by rapid intravenous injection on 5 consecutive days, beginning 24 hours after initiation of leucovorin infusion. Among the 20 assessable patients, there were no complete or partial regressions, although there was one minor response lasting 4 months. Three patients had stable disease for 5, 20, and 21 months, respectively. Median survival was 10 weeks. Toxicity was predominantly mucosal; stomatitis grade 2 or worse was seen in five patients, and diarrhea grade 2 or worse was seen in four. Hospitalization for toxicity was necessary in four previously untreated patients and three previously treated patients. The median WBC nadir was 4.6 (range, 1.4 to 9.6) x 10(3)/microL, and the median platelet nadir was 147.0 (range, 69.0 to 240.0) x 10(3)/microL. This combination of leucovorin and 5-FU did not demonstrate meaningful therapeutic activity in patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas and was associated with moderate to severe toxicity. It should not be considered a standard treatment for patients with this disease.

A phase III comparison trial of streptozotocin, mitomycin, and 5-fluorouracil with cisplatin, cytosine arabinoside, and caffeine in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma.

Conventional chemotherapy for unresectable or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas has had little effect on palliation or survival. Almost all studies of systemic therapy have involved empiric use of a variety of Phase II or conventional agents alone or in combination. On the basis of recent studies using a human tumor pancreatic cancer (PC) xenograft in nude mice, a Phase I clinical trial of cisplatin, high-dose cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C), and caffeine (CAC) was performed in patients with advanced incurable PC. A tolerable dose and schedule of the three agents were developed. Seven of 18 patients with measurable disease in this Phase I trial had partial responses to CAC. A Phase III comparison of CAC versus standard treatment using streptozotocin, mitomycin, and 5-fluorouracil (SMF) was performed. Eighty-two patients with advanced PC were entered into this random assignment trial. The two treatment arms were well balanced for the usual prognostic factors. Although the acute (e.g., nausea and vomiting) toxicities of CAC were greater than those of SMF, both groups of patients tolerated treatment resonably well. Ninety percent of patients were evaluable for response. Two patients (5.5%) on the CAC treatment arm (95% confidence interval [CI], 0% to 15%) and four patients (10.2%) on the SMF treatment arm (95% CI, 1% to 22%) had objective responses (partial response in measurable disease or improvement in evaluable disease). No complete remissions were observed. The 95% confidence limits of response for CAC and SMF overlapped. The median duration of survival for all patients on the SMF treatment arm was 10 months, although it was 5 months on the CAC treatment arm (P = 0.008). In this Phase III comparison, CAC was not superior to conventional therapy with SMF in terms of response and was inferior for survival. Neither regimen is effective treatment for advanced PC.

31P NMR spectra of extremity sarcomas: diversity of metabolic profiles and changes in response to chemotherapy.

We have used 31P NMR spectroscopy to study 22 patients with suspected sarcomas prior to any treatment. The spectra are characterized by the same peaks noted in murine tumors. The mean pH was 7.14 +/- 0.08 and PCr/Pi was 1.18 +/- 0.83. Comparison of pH and PCr/Pi ratios in human and a murine tumor with a low hypoxic cell fraction revealed no significant differences. Six patients subsequently received chemotherapy and three responded to therapy (based on pathologic examination and/or tumor reduction greater than 50%). The three responding patients were noted to have significantly lower PDE/PME in their pretreatment spectra than the three nonresponding patients. The three responding patients with sarcomas also showed a rise of greater than 100% in PDE/PME during the first cycle of therapy. Two of the responding patients had an increase of 0.37 pH units during this interval, which was not detected in the nonresponding patients. These data suggest that 31P NMR spectroscopy may be a useful prognostic indicator in conjunction with other clinical parameters.

Combined modality treatment of locally advanced breast cancer: adjuvant combination chemotherapy with and without doxorubicin.

Forty-one women with non-metastatic but locally advanced breast cancer were treated by modified radical or radical mastectomy, and were then randomized to receive one of two adjuvant chemotherapy regimens. Regimen A consisted of 6 months of cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, and fluorouracil (CAF) followed by 6 months of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil, vincristine, and prednisone (CMFVP). Regimen B was 12 months of CMFVP. Patients were stratified for estrogen-receptor status, and all patients with a positive estrogen receptor value received tamoxifen 20 mg bid in addition to the chemotherapy. Eight of 21 patients randomized to Regimen A are alive and free of disease, whereas only 1 of 20 patients on Regimen B is well. A trend toward improved disease-free survival favoring Regimen A was observed (P = .05), although a significant difference in overall survival has not been demonstrated. Our findings support the continued study of adriamycin-containing regimens in the adjuvant setting and in combined modality therapy of locally advanced breast cancer.

Therapeutic utility of utilizing low doses of N-(phosphonacetyl)-L-aspartic acid in combination with 5-fluorouracil: a murine study with clinical relevance.

Doses of N-(phosphonacetyl)-L-aspartic acid (PALA) lower than those required for therapeutic activity against the spontaneous murine breast tumor (BALB/c X DBA/8 F1) were found to produce significant depression in uridine triphosphate pools in the tumor. Using such low, nontherapeutic, but biochemically active doses of PALA in combination with 5-fluorouracil (FUra(, it was possible to maintain the dose of FUra at its full maximum tolerated single agent dose. In comparison with the maximum tolerated dose of FUra alone, the combination of FUra plus low-dose PALA produced a significant increase in the level of tumor FUra-containing RNA, only a slight increase in intestinal FUra-containing RNA, and no increase in bone marrow FUra-containing RNA. These biochemical results correlated with the therapeutic findings of significantly increased antitumor activity without an increase in host toxicity. A review of currently reported PALA plus FUra clinical protocols reveals that the experimental parameters which have produced successful therapeutic results in the laboratory (i.e., a low-PALA:high-FUra dosage ratio) have not yet been translated into clinical trial. Final judgment on the clinical efficacy of PALA:FUra combinations must await the results of proposed low-PALA:high-FUra clinical trials.

Phase I study of tricyclic nucleoside phosphate.

A phase I study of tricyclic nucleoside phosphate was conducted in 20 adults with advanced cancer. Tricyclic nucleoside phosphate was given as an iv infusion over 15 minutes once every 3 weeks; the doses ranged from 25 to 350 mg/m2. Beginning at a dose of 250 mg/m2, hyperglycemia and elevation of hepatocellular enzymes were observed; at a dose of 350 mg/m2, two patients developed irreversible liver damage. Patients at all dose levels experienced reduction in serum phosphorus; reduction of serum calcium was noted only with the two highest doses. Nausea and vomiting occurred occasionally. Myelosuppression was not a prominent toxic effect. No major therapeutic responses were noted. Further clinical trials employing this schedule are probably not warranted.

Phase II evaluation of metoprine in patients with non-small-cell lung carcinoma.

A phase II study of metoprine in low dose and in high dose with citrovorum rescue was conducted in patients with non-small-cell lung carcinoma. There were no responses observed in the 36 patients studied, yielding a predicted true response rate of less than 9%. Thrombocytopenia was the dose-limiting toxicity of the low-dose regimen; there was also one episode of leukopenia and sepsis in this group. Although citrovorum rescue obviated hematologic toxicity in the high-dose regimen, mild to moderate neurological toxicity occurred at this dose. Metoprine does not appear to be a useful agent in non-small-cell lung carcinoma when used in the dose schedule employed in this study.