Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
1.
Geriatrics (Basel) ; 9(2)2024 Feb 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38525741

RESUMEN

Vertebral fragility fractures (VFF) pose a challenge for appropriate care. The aim of this study was to develop consensus recommendations for the management of VFF in older people from a multidisciplinary approach. Specialists in osteoporosis belonging to different scientific societies reviewed the main clinical practice guidelines published in Spain in 2014. Thirty-five recommendations for the management of VFF were evaluated by seven experts using an anonymous survey. Consensus was defined as 80% of responses of 8 (agree) and 9 (strongly agree) on a Likert scale. Consensus was achieved in 22 recommendations (62.8%). The experts agreed on the need for anamnesis, clinical assessment, and laboratory tests, including erythrocyte sedimentation rate, proteinography, and the assessment of levels of calcium, vitamin D, alkaline phosphatase, and thyroid-stimulating hormone. Optional tests, such as bone turnover markers (BTMs), magnetic resonance imaging, bone scintigraphy, or using a fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX®), did not achieve an agreed consensus. Also, there was consensus regarding the administration of calcium/vitamin D supplements, the withdrawal of toxic habits, and personalized physical exercise. Participants agreed on the administration of teriparatide for 24 months and then a switch to denosumab or bisphosphonates in patients at high risk of fracture. Specialists in osteoporosis, primary care physicians, and geriatricians should be involved in the follow-up of patients with VFF. Although there was multidisciplinary agreement on diagnostic tests and non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment in frail older people, therapeutic objectives should be individualized for every patient. In addition to the specific recommendations, close collaboration between the geriatrician and the primary care physician is essential for the optimal chronic management of frail patients with fragility fractures.

2.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 61(11): 4427-4436, 2022 11 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35166821

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess efficacy and safety of biologic therapy (BT) in neurobehçet's disease (NBD) refractory to glucocorticoids and at least one conventional immunosuppressive drug. METHODS: Open-label, national, multicentre study. NBD diagnosis was based on the International Consensus Recommendation criteria. Outcome variables were efficacy and safety. Main efficacy outcome was clinical remission. Other outcome variables analysed were glucocorticoid-sparing effect and improvement in laboratory parameters. RESULTS: We studied 41 patients [21 women; age 40.6 (10.8) years]. Neurological damage was parenchymal (n = 33, 80.5%) and non-parenchymal (n = 17, 41.5%). First BTs used were infliximab (n = 19), adalimumab (n = 14), golimumab (n = 3), tocilizumab (n = 3) and etanercept (n = 2). After 6 months of BT, neurological remission was complete (n = 23, 56.1%), partial (n = 15, 37.6%) and no response (n = 3, 7.3%). In addition, median (IQR) dose of oral prednisone decreased from 60 (30-60) mg/day at the initial visit to 5 (3.8-10) mg/day after 6 months (P < 0.001). It was also the case for mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate [31.5 (25.6)-15.3 (11.9) mm/1st h, P = 0.011] and median (IQR) C-reactive protein [1.4 (0.2-12.8) to 0.3 (0.1-3) mg/dl, P = 0.001]. After a mean follow-up of 57.5 months, partial or complete neurological remission persisted in 37 patients (90.2%). BT was switched in 22 cases (53.6%) due to inefficacy (n = 16) or adverse events (AEs) (n = 6) and discontinued due to complete prolonged remission (n = 3) or severe AE (n = 1). Serious AEs were observed in two patients under infliximab treatment. CONCLUSIONS: BT appears to be effective and relatively safe in refractory NBD.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Biológica , Inmunosupresores , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Etanercept/uso terapéutico , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Glucocorticoides , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto
4.
J Clin Densitom ; 24(4): 630-637, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33618949

RESUMEN

Adults with Down syndrome (DS) have lower bone mineral density (BMD) than the general population. The objective of our study was to describe bone mineral status in DS population through volumetric BMD (vBMD) and trabecular bone score (TBS). Retrospective study of 297 subjects recruited from the Adult DS Outpatient Clinic of a tertiary care hospital in Spain, who underwent a bone densitometry for clinical purposes between January 2010 and June 2015. vBMD determination and TBS analysis on conventional DXA (Hologic QDR 4500) densitometer were performed in this cohort. The mean (±SD) age of our population was 34.3 (±10.9) years; 51% were women. Trabecular vBMD at total hip and femoral neck was lower in males than in females (191.7 ± 48.4 mg/cm3 vs 206.9 ± 46.7 mg/cm3, p = 0.007, and 250.5 ± 70.1 mg/cm3 vs 275.7 ± 66.2 mg/cm3, p = 0.002, respectively). Trabecular and cortical vBMD decreased with age, but age decline in trabecular vBMD was more pronounced in males. Likewise, lumbar TBS declined with age being normal in 63%, low in 29% and very low in 8% of subjects with DS, without differences between sexes. TBS showed a positive correlation (r = 0.37; p < 0.001, Kappa index= 0.275) with conventional DXA lumbar Z-score. vBMD at the hip showed lower values in DS subjects than in the general population, especially in males. Moreover, TBS was also lower at lumbar spine. Therefore, both assessments could be used as complementary tools to areal BMD (Z-score) to assess bone status in DS subjects.


Asunto(s)
Densidad Ósea , Síndrome de Down , Absorciometría de Fotón , Adulto , Hueso Esponjoso/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome de Down/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Cuello Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
5.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 39(1): 105-114, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33124565

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Clinicians often face the challenge of providing effective and safe therapy for pregnant women with uveitis. Certolizumab pegol (CZP) differs from other anti-TNFα agents due to its limited placental transfer. In this study we assessed the efficacy of CZP in pregnant women with uveitis. We also provided information on outcomes of pregnant women and neonates exposed to CZP. METHODS: We carried out a multicentre study of women with uveitis who received CZP during pregnancy and their neonates. The main visual outcomes were visual acuity (VA), intraocular inflammation and corticosteroid-sparing effect. Pregnancy outcomes, maternal and neonatal infections and congenital malformations were also assessed. RESULTS: We studied 14 women (23 affected eyes); mean age of 34.3±5.5 years. The underlying diseases were spondyloarthritis (n=7), idiopathic (n=2), and Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada, rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, punctate inner choroidopathy and Behçet's disease (1 each). The patterns of ocular involvement were anterior (n=10), posterior (n=2), intermediate (n=1), panuveitis (n=1). Cystoid macular oedema was present in one patient (1 eye). Uveitis was bilateral in nine cases and chronic in seven patients. CZP was started before getting pregnant in ten patients and after conceiving in four. All patients achieved or maintained ocular remission throughout pregnancy. Fifteen healthy infants were born. Only one woman presented a mild infection during pregnancy. Neither infections nor malformations were observed in neonates after a follow-up of 6 months. Six infants were breastfed and all of them received scheduled vaccinations without complications. CONCLUSIONS: Certolizumab pegol is effective and safe in women with uveitis during pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Mujeres Embarazadas , Uveítis , Adulto , Terapia Biológica , Certolizumab Pegol/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Uveítis/diagnóstico , Uveítis/tratamiento farmacológico
6.
Expert Rev Clin Immunol ; 14(7): 593-605, 2018 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29877748

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common large-vessel vasculitis in individuals older than 50 years from Western countries. The goal of the treatment is to achieve improvement of symptoms and clinical remission as well as decrease the risk of severe vascular complications. Areas covered: The review summarizes the main epidemiological and clinical features of GCA and discusses in depth both the classic and the new therapies used in the management of GCA. Expert commentary: Prednisone/prednisolone of 40-60 mg/day is the mainstay in GCA therapy. It yields improvement of clinical features and reduces the risk of permanent visual loss in patients with GCA. Other drugs are used in patients who experience relapses (flares of the disease) or side effects related to glucocorticoids. Methotrexate is the most common conventional immunosuppressive drug used as a glucocorticoid sparing agent. Among the new biologic agents, the most frequently used is the recombinant humanized anti-IL-6 receptor antibody, which is effective to improve clinical symptoms, decrease the cumulative prednisone dose, and reduce the frequency of relapses in these patients. Antitumor necrosis factor-α therapy is not useful in GCA. Experience with other biologic agents, such as abatacept or ustekinumab, looks promising but it is still scarce.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Terapia Biológica , Arteritis de Células Gigantes/tratamiento farmacológico , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Animales , Arteritis de Células Gigantes/diagnóstico , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Receptores de Interleucina-6/inmunología
7.
Reumatol. clín. (Barc.) ; 13(5): 287-293, sept.-oct. 2017. tab, ilus
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-165226

RESUMEN

No cabe duda de que los productos biológicos aportan un valor añadido a los sistemas de salud, aunque también plantean grandes interrogantes debido a su especial naturaleza, lo que obliga a ser muy rigurosos y exigentes en su control de calidad y seguimiento. Este hecho se ha visto reforzado por la entrada en escena de los fármacos biosimilares, cuyo menor coste está permitiéndoles alcanzar un mayor protagonismo en el mercado mundial. El propósito de este artículo es revisar en profundidad los principales interrogantes que se plantean en su producción, distribución y control, así como los aspectos más importantes relacionados con su seguridad en la práctica clínica. En este trabajo revisamos lo que representa la farmacovigilancia de estos productos, prestando especial atención a su trazabilidad, como herramienta fundamental para la detección precoz de acontecimientos adversos (AU)


There is no doubt that biologic therapies provide added value for health systems. However, due to their special nature, they also raise some questions that make highly rigorous and demanding quality control and monitoring of their use indispensable. This circumstance is reinforced with the appearance on the scene of biosimilars, which, given their lower cost, are having an increasing impact on the international market. The purpose of this article is to review the major issues posed by their manufacture, distribution and control systems, as well as the most important aspects related to their safety in clinical practice. In this report, we assess the pharmacovigilance of these products, with special attention to traceability, as a key tool to enable earlier detection of adverse events (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Terapia Biológica/métodos , Farmacovigilancia , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/síntesis química , Terapia Biológica , Terapia Biológica/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Etiquetado de Medicamentos/normas , Medicamentos Genéricos/economía , Medicamentos Genéricos/uso terapéutico
8.
Reumatol. clín. (Barc.) ; 13(4): 210-213, jul.-ago. 2017. tab
Artículo en Inglés | IBECS | ID: ibc-164336

RESUMEN

Objectives. To describe the results obtained in clinical practice with the use of biological therapy (BT) in patients diagnosed with Takayasu arteritis (TA) and giant cell arteritis (GCA). Methods. Retrospective single center study of TA/GCA patients who received BT (infliximab [IFX], etanercept [ETN] and tocilizumab [TCZ]). In TA, active disease was defined according to a previous National Institutes of Health study. In GCA, active disease was defined with a modified criteria and clinical manifestations secondary to temporal artery involvement or polymyalgia rheumatica symptoms. Clinical data and outcomes are reported using descriptive statistics. Results. Five patients with TA and 5 with GCA were included. The main reason for starting BT was lack of response to prior therapy and/or ≥2 relapses during GC tapering. Five patients started IFX, four TCZ and 1 ETN. Remission was observed before 6 months in all cases. Only one patient had a relapse during long-term follow-up and the overall GC daily dose was reduced by 70%. Two AEs were considered attributable to IFX and one to TCZ. Conclusion. A favorable and sustained response to BT was observed in our patients with TA and GCA. Thus, BT might be considered as an alternative in patients with large vessel arteritis refractory to conventional treatment or with GC related comorbidities (AU)


Objetivos. Describir los resultados obtenidos en la práctica clínica diaria con el uso de la terapia biológica (TB) en pacientes con diagnóstico de arteritis de Takayasu (AT) y arteritis de células gigantes (ACG). Métodos. Estudio retrospectivo monocéntrico de pacientes con AT/ACG que recibieron TB (infliximab, etanercept y tocilizumab). En AT, la enfermedad activa se definió de acuerdo a un estudio previo del National Institutes of Health. En ACG, la enfermedad activa se definió con dichos criterios modificados y manifestaciones clínicas secundarias a afectación de la arteria temporal o síntomas de polimialgia reumática. Los datos y los desenlaces clínicos se muestran mediante estadística descriptiva. Resultados. Se incluyeron 5 pacientes con AT y 5 con ACG. La razón principal para el inicio de la TB fue la falta de respuesta al tratamiento previo y/o ≥2 recaídas durante la terapia con corticoides. Cinco pacientes comenzaron infliximab, 4 tocilizumab y uno etanercept. La remisión se observó antes de los 6 meses en todos los casos. Solo un paciente tuvo una recaída durante el seguimiento a largo plazo. La dosis diaria de corticoides se redujo globalmente en un 70%. Dos acontecimientos adversos se consideraron atribuibles a infliximab y uno a tocilizumab. Conclusión. Se observó una respuesta favorable y sostenida a la TB en nuestros pacientes con AT y ACG. Por lo tanto, la TB puede ser considerada una alternativa en pacientes refractarios al tratamiento convencional o con comorbilidades asociadas a los corticoides (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Vasculitis/terapia , Terapia Biológica , Arteritis de Células Gigantes/terapia , Arteritis de Takayasu/terapia , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Etanercept/uso terapéutico , Polimialgia Reumática/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Epidemiología Descriptiva , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , 28599
9.
J Clin Lipidol ; 11(3): 749-756.e3, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28476652

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Plasma concentrations of lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)), a lipoprotein with atherogenic and thrombogenic properties, have a strong genetic basis, although high concentrations of Lp(a) have also been reported in the context of inflammation, as in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Few studies evaluate the impact of biologic therapies (BT) on Lp(a) in RA, taking into account that with these new therapies a better control of inflammation is achieved. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the plasma concentrations of Lp(a) in Spanish RA patients on BT attending rheumatology outpatient clinics. METHODS: Baseline analysis of the CARdiovascular in rheuMAtology project, a 10-year prospective study, evaluating the risk of cardiovascular events in RA and other forms of inflammatory arthritis. RA patients were classified according to treatment: no biologic, anti-tumor necrosis factor, anti-interleukin-6 receptor tocilizumab (TCZ), and other biologic (rituximab or abatacept). A model of linear multivariate regression was built in which the dependent variable was Lp(a) concentration and the explanatory variable was BT. The model was adjusted for confounding factors. RESULTS: Seven hundred and seventy-five RA patients were analyzed. Plasma concentrations of total cholesterol and triglyceride were significantly higher in TCZ-treated patients. Nevertheless, no significant difference in the atherogenic index between TCZ-treated patients and patients without BT was found. After adjusting for confounding factors, patients with BT had lower concentrations of Lp(a) than those without BT; however, only TCZ-treated patients achieved statistically significant differences (ß: -0.303, 95% confidence interval: -0.558 to -0.047; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: RA patients treated with TCZ show lower plasma concentrations of Lp(a) compared with patients without BT.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide/sangre , Artritis Reumatoide/terapia , Terapia Biológica , Lipoproteína(a)/sangre , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Riesgo
10.
Reumatol Clin ; 13(5): 287-293, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27372258

RESUMEN

There is no doubt that biologic therapies provide added value for health systems. However, due to their special nature, they also raise some questions that make highly rigorous and demanding quality control and monitoring of their use indispensable. This circumstance is reinforced with the appearance on the scene of biosimilars, which, given their lower cost, are having an increasing impact on the international market. The purpose of this article is to review the major issues posed by their manufacture, distribution and control systems, as well as the most important aspects related to their safety in clinical practice. In this report, we assess the pharmacovigilance of these products, with special attention to traceability, as a key tool to enable earlier detection of adverse events.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Biológica/efectos adversos , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Farmacovigilancia , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/economía , Control de Medicamentos y Narcóticos , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Seguridad del Paciente
11.
Reumatol Clin ; 13(4): 210-213, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27499427

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To describe the results obtained in clinical practice with the use of biological therapy (BT) in patients diagnosed with Takayasu arteritis (TA) and giant cell arteritis (GCA). METHODS: Retrospective single center study of TA/GCA patients who received BT (infliximab [IFX], etanercept [ETN] and tocilizumab [TCZ]). In TA, active disease was defined according to a previous National Institutes of Health study. In GCA, active disease was defined with a modified criteria and clinical manifestations secondary to temporal artery involvement or polymyalgia rheumatica symptoms. Clinical data and outcomes are reported using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Five patients with TA and 5 with GCA were included. The main reason for starting BT was lack of response to prior therapy and/or ≥2 relapses during GC tapering. Five patients started IFX, four TCZ and 1 ETN. Remission was observed before 6 months in all cases. Only one patient had a relapse during long-term follow-up and the overall GC daily dose was reduced by 70%. Two AEs were considered attributable to IFX and one to TCZ. CONCLUSION: A favorable and sustained response to BT was observed in our patients with TA and GCA. Thus, BT might be considered as an alternative in patients with large vessel arteritis refractory to conventional treatment or with GC related comorbidities.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Etanercept/uso terapéutico , Arteritis de Células Gigantes/tratamiento farmacológico , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Arteritis de Takayasu/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Terapia Biológica , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Inducción , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Reumatol Clin ; 8(2): 78-83, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22104048

RESUMEN

The double and simultaneous molecular interaction between antigen-presentig cells (APC) and T lymphocytes is essential for the optimal activation of the immunological response and requires the participation of two membrane receptor groups. Abatacept is a fusion protein that selectively modulates one of these two ways, by binding to CD80 and CD86 receptors on APC. In this way, the drug inhibits T cell activation, selectively blocking the specific interaction of CD80/CD86 receptors to CD28 and, therefore, inhibiting T cell proliferation and B cell immunological response. This pharmacological action results in the normalization of inflammatory mediators in rheumatoid arthritis patients and in a safe and efficacious clinical response. Abatacept in combination with methotrexate prevents the progression of joint damage and improves physical function in rheumatoid arthritis patients.


Asunto(s)
Presentación de Antígeno/efectos de los fármacos , Células Presentadoras de Antígenos/efectos de los fármacos , Antirreumáticos/farmacología , Inmunoconjugados/farmacología , Abatacept , Animales , Células Presentadoras de Antígenos/inmunología , Antirreumáticos/administración & dosificación , Antirreumáticos/metabolismo , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Artritis Reumatoide/inmunología , Linfocitos B/inmunología , Antígeno B7-1/inmunología , Antígeno B7-1/metabolismo , Antígeno B7-2/inmunología , Antígeno B7-2/metabolismo , Unión Competitiva , Antígenos CD28/inmunología , Antígenos CD28/metabolismo , Antígeno CTLA-4/química , Antígeno CTLA-4/fisiología , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos , Humanos , Inmunoconjugados/administración & dosificación , Inmunoconjugados/metabolismo , Inmunoconjugados/uso terapéutico , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Activación de Linfocitos , Metotrexato/administración & dosificación , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico , Ratones , Modelos Inmunológicos , Especificidad del Receptor de Antígeno de Linfocitos T , Linfocitos T/efectos de los fármacos , Linfocitos T/inmunología
13.
J Bone Miner Metab ; 26(1): 53-9, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18095064

RESUMEN

To characterize an experimental model of osteoporosis in rabbits induced either by ovariectomy (OVX), glucocorticoids, or by a combination of both. Thirty-five rabbits were randomly allocated into five groups: bilateral OVX, daily methylprednisolone hemisuccinate (MPH) injections at a 1.5 mg/kg/day dose for 4 consecutive weeks (MPH group), or variable dose of MPH between 0.5 and 2 mg/kg/day in combination with OVX (OVX + MPH at low, medium, and high dose). Twenty-two animals were killed 6 weeks after OVX, and 13 were killed 16 weeks later. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was obtained at baseline and 6 and 16 weeks after OVX. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was carried out at 0 and 6 weeks after OVX. Glucose, total cholesterol, triglyceride, and oestradiol blood levels before and 16 weeks after OVX were determined. Bone mineral density (BMD) decreased significantly at lumbar spine in MPH and OVX + MPH medium-dose groups, and at global knee and subchondral bone of the knee in MPH, OVX + MPH low- and medium-dosage groups (P < 0.05). BMD variations in OVX rabbits were not significant in any of the three anatomical locations analyzed. BMD variation 16 weeks after OVX was significant at lumbar spine and global knee in the OVX + MPH medium-dose group and only at global knee in the OVX + MPH low-dose group (P < 0.05). MRI did not show bone or cartilage changes. Osteoporosis can be induced experimentally in rabbits through isolated MPH or by a combination of OVX and medium dose corticosteroid for 4 weeks. OVX alone was not sufficient to induce osteoporosis.


Asunto(s)
Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Osteoporosis , Animales , Glucemia/metabolismo , Densidad Ósea , Colesterol/sangre , Estradiol/sangre , Femenino , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Hemisuccinato de Metilprednisolona , Osteoporosis/inducido químicamente , Osteoporosis/patología , Ovariectomía , Conejos , Triglicéridos/sangre
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA