Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Hematol Oncol ; 13(1): 46, 2020 05 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32375860

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is highly effective in preventing graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in the haploidentical (Haplo) transplant setting and is being increasingly used in matched sibling (MSD) and matched unrelated (MUD) transplants. There is no information on the impact of donor types using homogeneous prophylaxis with PTCy. METHODS: We retrospectively compared outcomes of adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1) who received a first allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) with PTCy as GVHD prophylaxis from MSD (n = 215), MUD (n = 235), and Haplo (n = 789) donors registered in the EBMT database between 2010 and 2017. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 2 years. Haplo-SCT carried a significantly increased risk of acute grade II-IV GVHD (HR 1.6; 95% CI 1.1-2.4) and NRM (HR 2.6; 95% CI 1.5-4.5) but a lower risk of relapse (HR 0.7; 95% CI 0.5-0.9) that translated to no differences in LFS (HR 1.1; 95% CI 0.8-1.4) or GVHD/relapse-free survival (HR 1; 95% CI 0.8-1.3). Interestingly, the use of peripheral blood was associated with an increased risk of acute (HR 1.9; 95% CI 1.4-2.6) and chronic GVHD (HR 1.7; 95% CI 1.2-2.4) but a lower risk of relapse (HR 0.7; 95% CI 0.5-0.9). CONCLUSIONS: The use of PTCy in patients with AML in CR1 receiving SCT from MSD, MUD, and Haplo is safe and effective. Haplo-SCT had increased risk of acute GVHD and NRM and lower relapse incidence but no significant difference in survival.


Asunto(s)
Ciclofosfamida/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/prevención & control , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Selección de Donante , Femenino , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/etiología , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hermanos , Donantes de Tejidos , Trasplante Haploidéntico/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
2.
J Clin Oncol ; 35(30): 3425-3432, 2017 Oct 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28846465

RESUMEN

Purpose To compare the outcome of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma who received post-transplantation cyclophosphamide-based haploidentical (HAPLO) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with the outcome of patients who received conventional HLA-matched sibling donor (SIB) and HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD). Patients and Methods We retrospectively evaluated 709 adult patients with Hodgkin lymphoma who were registered in the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation database who received HAPLO (n = 98), SIB (n = 338), or MUD (n = 273) transplantation. Results Median follow-up of survivors was 29 months. No differences were observed between groups in the incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). HAPLO was associated with a lower risk of chronic GVHD (26%) compared with MUD (41%; P = .04). Cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality at 1 year was 17%, 13%, and 21% in HAPLO, SIB, and MUD, respectively, and corresponding 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse or progression was 39%, 49%, and 32%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, relative to SIB, nonrelapse mortality was similar in HAPLO ( P = .26) and higher in MUD ( P = .003), and risk of relapse was lower in both HAPLO ( P = .047) and MUD ( P < .001). Two-year overall survival and progression-free survival were 67% and 43% for HAPLO, 71% and 38% for SIB, and 62% and 45% for MUD, respectively. There were no significant differences in overall survival or progression-free survival between HAPLO and SIB or MUD. The rate of the composite end point of extensive chronic GVHD and relapse-free survival was significantly better for HAPLO (40%) compared with SIB (28%; P = .049) and similar to MUD (38%; P = .59). Conclusion Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide-based HAPLO transplantation results in similar survival outcomes compared with SIB and MUD, which confirms its suitability when no conventional donor is available. Our results also suggest that HAPLO results in a lower risk of chronic GVHD than MUD transplantation.


Asunto(s)
Ciclofosfamida/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/terapia , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Trasplante de Médula Ósea/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Médula Ósea/métodos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/etiología , Haplotipos , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hermanos , Trasplante Homólogo , Donante no Emparentado , Adulto Joven
3.
Am J Hematol ; 89(1): 83-7, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24108528

RESUMEN

Conditioning regimen including fludarabine, intravenous busulfan (Bx), and 5 mg/kg total dose of rabbit antithymocyte globulin (r-ATG) (FBx-ATG) results in low incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT) from HLA-matched related or unrelated donors (MUD). However, whether this platform produces similar results in the setting of one mismatch unrelated donor (MMUD) Allo-HSCT is not known. We retrospectively analyzed patients aged less than 65 years who were diagnosed with hematological malignancies and received FBx-ATG regimen prior to Allo-HSCT from MUD (N = 74) or MMUD (N = 40). We compared outcome of MUD versus MMUD patients. There was no difference in the cumulative incidence of grades II-IV acute GVHD (MUD: 34% vs. MMUD: 35%, P = 0.918), but MMUD patients developed more grade III-IV acute GVHD (MUD: 5% vs. MMUD: 15%, P = 0.016). The cumulative incidences of overall chronic GVHD (MUD: 33% vs. MMUD: 22%, P = 0.088) and extensive chronic GVHD (MUD: 20% vs. MMUD: 19%, P = 0.594) were comparable. One-year NRM was similar in both groups (MUD: 16% vs. MMUD: 14%, P = 0.292); similarly, progression-free survival (MUD: 59% vs. MMUD: 55%, P = 0.476) and overall survival (MUD: 63% vs. MMUD: 61%, P = 0.762) were not different between both groups. With a median follow up of 24 months, 35 of 74 MUD patients (47%) and 19 of 40 MMUD patients (48%) were free of both disease progression and immunosuppressive treatment. We conclude that the FBx-ATG regimen results in low incidences of NRM and GVHD in both MUD and the MMUD recipients.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Donantes de Tejidos , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Suero Antilinfocítico/administración & dosificación , Busulfano/administración & dosificación , Causas de Muerte , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/epidemiología , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/etiología , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/prevención & control , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hematológicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Incidencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante/métodos , Trasplante Homólogo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vidarabina/administración & dosificación , Vidarabina/análogos & derivados , Adulto Joven
4.
Am J Hematol ; 81(1): 1-4, 2006 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16369969

RESUMEN

Patients with a central venous catheter (CVC) undergoing high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) followed by peripheral-blood stem-cell transplantation (PBSCT) for malignancies are at high risk of thrombosis, but the use of anti-coagulant prophylaxis remains debatable in this setting of patients. We analyzed the efficacy and the safety of minidose warfarin in 228 patients in whom CVCs had been placed and who had received 292 HDC courses of therapy. The catheters remained in place for a mean of 173 (range 40-298) days. All patients received prophylactic oral warfarin in the fixed dose of 1 mg/day starting on the day of CVC insertion. Prophylaxis was interrupted during aplasia when platelet counts fell below 50,000/dL. There were no toxic deaths related to the prophylaxis. Overall there were 4 thrombotic events. Three occurrences were directly related to the catheter, while the remaining event was a deep saphenous-vein thrombosis. A number of potential predictive factors were analyzed for their impact on thrombotic events without finding any significant correlation. Four episodes of bleeding occurred, with each of these individuals having a normal INR but a platelet count below 50,000/dL. Minidose warfarin is effective and safe to use for preventing thrombotic events in this setting of patients.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Neoplasias/terapia , Trasplante de Células Madre de Sangre Periférica , Trombosis de la Vena/prevención & control , Warfarina/administración & dosificación , Administración Oral , Carmustina/administración & dosificación , Citarabina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Masculino , Melfalán/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias/sangre , Recuento de Plaquetas , Podofilotoxina/administración & dosificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Trasplante Homólogo , Trombosis de la Vena/sangre , Trombosis de la Vena/etiología , Warfarina/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA