Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Drug Test Anal ; 15(8): 803-839, 2023 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37357012

RESUMEN

The first nootropic prohibited in sport was fonturacetam (4-phenylpiracetam, carphedon) in 1998. Presented here 25 years later is a broad-scale consideration of the history, pharmacology, prevalence, regulations, and doping potential of nootropics viewed through a lens of 50 selected dietary supplements (DS) marketed as "cognitive enhancement," "brain health," "brain boosters," or "nootropics," with a focus on unauthorized ingredients. Nootropic DS have risen to prominence over the last decade often as multicomponent formulations of bioactive ingredients presenting compelling pharmacological questions and potential public health concerns. Many popular nootropics are unauthorized food or DS ingredients according to the European Commission including huperzine A, yohimbine, and dimethylaminoethanol; unapproved pharmaceuticals like phenibut or emoxypine (mexidol); previously registered drugs like meclofenoxate or reserpine; EU authorized pharmaceuticals like piracetam or vinpocetine; infamous doping agents like methylhexaneamine or dimethylbutylamine; and other investigational substances and peptides. Several are authorized DS ingredients in the United States resulting in significant global variability as to what qualifies as a legal nootropic. Prohibited stimulants or ß2-agonists commonly used in "pre-workout," "weight loss," or "thermogenic" DS such as octodrine, hordenine, or higenamine are often stacked with nootropic substances. While stimulants and ß2-agonists are defined as doping agents by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), many nootropics are not, although some may qualify as non-approved substances or related substances under catch-all language in the WADA Prohibited List. Synergistic combinations, excessive dosing, or recently researched pharmacology may justify listing certain nootropics as doping agents or warrant additional attention in future regulations.


Asunto(s)
Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central , Doping en los Deportes , Nootrópicos , Prevalencia , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central/farmacología , Suplementos Dietéticos , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas
2.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 87(12): 5449-54, 2002 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12466335

RESUMEN

Androstenedione is a steroid hormone and an intermediate in the synthetic pathway of both testosterone and estradiol in men and women. It is available without prescription and taken with the expectation that it may have beneficial effects on strength, general well-being, libido, and quality of life. Although studies have shown that oral androstenedione increases serum testosterone and estradiol levels in men, the hormonal effects of androstenedione in postmenopausal women are unknown. We randomly assigned 30 healthy postmenopausal women to receive 0, 50, or 100 mg androstenedione as a single oral dose. After androstenedione administration, we made hourly measurements of serum androstenedione, estrone, estradiol, and testosterone concentrations during 12 h of frequent blood sampling. The mean change (+/-SD) in serum androstenedione area under the curve (AUC) was greater in both the 50-mg (79 +/- 39%) and 100-mg dose groups (242 +/- 184%) than in the control group (-29 +/- 28%) (P < 0.0001 for controls vs. 50-mg group and controls vs. 100-mg group). The mean change in serum androstenedione AUC was also greater in the 100-mg than 50-mg dose group (P = 0.0026). The mean change in serum estrone AUC was greater in both the 50-mg (108 +/- 72%) and 100-mg dose groups (116 +/- 119%) than in the control group (-5 +/- 19%), although the control vs. 100-mg group comparison did not quite meet statistical significance (P < 0.0001 for controls vs. 50-mg group, P = 0.0631 controls vs. 100-mg group). The mean change in serum estradiol AUC remained stable after supplementation in all groups without any between-group differences observed (-11 +/- 17%, 2.8 +/- 34%, -11 +/- 27%, for the control, 50-mg, and 100-mg groups, respectively). The mean change in serum testosterone AUC was greater in both the 50-mg (185 +/- 146%) and 100-mg dose groups (457 +/- 601%) than in the control group (-27 +/- 13%) (P < 0.0001 for controls vs. 50-mg group and for controls vs. 100-mg group). The mean change in testosterone AUC was also greater in the 100-mg dose group than 50-mg dose group (P = 0.0257). There was considerable individual variability in the changes of serum androstenedione, estrone, and testosterone levels in the treated groups with peak serum testosterone levels exceeding the upper limit of normal in 4 of 10 women in the 50-mg dose group and 6 of 10 in the 100-mg dose group. We concluded that the acute administration of both 50-mg and 100-mg of androstenedione increases serum testosterone and estrone levels, but not estradiol levels, in postmenopausal women. If these hormonal effects are sustained during long-term administration, regular use of this supplement by postmenopausal women could thus cause both beneficial and adverse effects.


Asunto(s)
Androstenodiona/administración & dosificación , Estradiol/sangre , Posmenopausia/sangre , Testosterona/sangre , Administración Oral , Androstenodiona/uso terapéutico , Área Bajo la Curva , Grupos Control , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Estrona/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA