Concomitant boost plus large-field preoperative chemoradiation in locally advanced uterine cervix carcinoma: Phase II clinical trial final results (LARA-CC-1).

OBJECTIVE: To report the Phase II study final results in terms of pathological complete response (pCR) and complications in locally advanced cervical carcinoma (LACC) patients treated with chemoradiation (CT/RT) regimen based on accelerated fractionation, nodal extended fields and adjuvant radical surgery. METHODS: The sample size was quantified according to published data which shows that CT/RT followed by radical surgery in LACC patients provides a pCR rate above 45%. The 2-stage design by Simon was used to test the null hypothesis that the true pCR would improve by above 20%. The chemoradiation regimen was considered active if >24/43 pCRs were recorded. 40 Gy/2 Gy fraction in 4 weeks was delivered to nodal volume extending up to L3 vertebra, concurrently with chemotherapy. 45 Gy in 20 fractions with a concomitant boost strategy was delivered to the macroscopic disease only. RESULTS: 47 patients were enrolled. Median follow-up was 26 months (3-52 months). Pathological response was assessed in 44/47 patients: 17/44 (38.6%) showed a pCR to treatment, and 9/44 cases (20.5%) showed microscopic disease. Pelvic nodal metastases were documented in 9/44 cases (20.5%). 87.5% of recurrences were extra pelvic. Five patients (11%) developed acute severe gastrointestinal toxicity. The actuarial cumulative 2-year incidence of G ≥ 2 late cutaneous, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary toxicity was 10.3%, 8.3% and 24.9%, respectively. The 3-year DFS was 77.1%, while the 3-year OS was 80.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm the high tolerability and efficacy of this accelerated regimen. However, based on the study design, 45 Gy as a concomitant boost CT/RT delivered by a 3D technique does not seem sufficient to increase pCR rate.

Concomitant boost dose escalation plus large-field preoperative chemoradiation in locally advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix: results of a phase I study (LARA-CC-1).

OBJECTIVE: To determine the recommended preoperative dose of large-field chemoradiation along with concomitant boost dose escalation on the tumor in locally advanced cervical carcinoma (LACC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A radiation dose of 40Gy over four weeks, 2Gy per fraction, was delivered to the tumor and the lymphatic drainage (planning target volume, PTV2), which encompassed a volume larger than standard (upper field border: L3 vertebra), concurrently with chemotherapy (cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil). Radiation dose was escalated to the macroscopic tumor only (PTV1) with a concomitant boost strategy. Three dose levels were planned: levels 1 (no PTV1 boost), 2 (45/2.25Gy) and 3 (50/2.5Gy). Patients were treated in cohorts of six to twelve per group using a standard phase I study design. The recommended dose was exceeded if >2 of 6 patients in a cohort experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). RESULTS: 32 patients (median age: 50 years; FIGO stage IB2: 4, IIA: 3, IIB: 21, III-IVA: 4) were enrolled. Median follow-up was 18 months (3-49 months). The most common grade 3/4 toxicity was gastrointestinal (diarrhea). Since three DLTs (grade 3 diarrhea, n=2; grade 3 proctitis, n=1), were observed in 4 patients at level 3, the trial was closed and level 2 was judged as the recommended dose. CONCLUSION: Based on the data from this phase I study, 45Gy/2.25Gy to macroscopic tumor and 40Gy/2Gy to lymphatic drainage may be considered the recommended doses.

Capecitabine based postoperative accelerated chemoradiation of pancreatic carcinoma. A dose-escalation study.

UNLABELLED: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of escalating up to 55 Gy within five weeks, the dose of external beam radiotherapy to the previous tumor site concurrently with a fixed daily dose of capecitabine, in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with resected pancreatic carcinoma were eligible for this study. Capecitabine was administered at a daily dose of 1600 mg/m (2). Regional lymph nodes received a total radiation dose of 45 Gy with 1.8 Gy per fractions. The starting radiation dose to the tumor bed was 50.0 Gy (2.0 Gy/fraction, 25 fractions). Escalation was achieved up to a total dose of 55.0 Gy by increasing the fraction size by 0.2 Gy (2.2 Gy/fraction), while keeping the duration of radiotherapy to five weeks (25 fractions). A concomitant boost technique was used. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any grade>3 hematologic toxicity, grade>2 liver, renal, neurologic, gastrointestinal, or skin toxicity, by RTOG criteria, or any toxicity producing prolonged (> 10 days) radiotherapy interruption. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Twelve patients entered the study (median age: 64 years). In the first cohort (six patients), no patient experienced DLT. Similarly in the second cohort, no DLT occurred. All 12 patients completed the planned regimen of therapy. Nine patients experienced grade 1-2 nausea and/or vomiting. Grade 2 hematological toxicity occurred in four patients. The results of our study indicate that a total radiation dose up to 55.0 Gy/5 weeks can be safely administered to the tumor bed, concurrently with capecitabine (1600 mg/m (2)) in patients with resected pancreatic carcinoma.

Chemoradiation with concomitant boost followed by radical surgery in locally advanced cervical cancer: a dose-escalation study.

OBJECTIVE: Aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of an accelerated fractionation radiotherapy by concomitant boost in locally advanced cervical cancer patients, to explore the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of radiation through a dose-escalation scheme, and to verify if increasing the radiation dose would result in a higher rate of pathologic complete response. METHODS: During the first and the last week of treatment, a combination of cisplatin (20 mg/mq/d, IV, days 1-4) and 5-fluorouracil (1 g/mq/d, continuous venous infusion, days 1-4) was administered. The dose escalation of external radiotherapy was delivered on the primary tumor, using the concomitant boost technique (CB, 90 cGy per fraction), delivering 3 different dose levels: (1) 1 weekly boost for a total dose of 4320 cGy; (2) 2 weekly boosts, total dose 4680 cGy; (3) 3 weekly boosts, total dose of 5040 cGy. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were submitted to a radiochemotherapeutic schedule of 3960 cGy in 22 fractions on pelvic lymph nodal stations. The MTD of radiation was not reached, being the only toxicities registered neutropenia G3 (n = 4), thrombocytopenia G3 (n = 1), stomatitis G3 (n = 1), diarrhea G3 (n = 2) easily managed. Six weeks after the end of radiochemotherapy, 17 patients were submitted to radical surgery, and are therefore evaluable for pathologic response. Among them, 15 complete remissions (88.2%, including 3 microscopical partial response), 1 partial response (5.9%), and 1 progression (5.9%) have been observed. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate, even if in a small study, that this regimen of concurrent chemoradiation followed by radical surgery is well tolerated.

Intraoperative radiation therapy in resected pancreatic carcinoma: long-term analysis.

PURPOSE: The combination of external radiotherapy (RT) plus intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) in patients with pancreatic cancer is still debated. This study presents long-term results (minimum follow-up, 102 months) for 26 patients undergoing integrated adjuvant RT (external RT+IORT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1990 to 1995, a total of 17 patients with pancreatic cancer underwent IORT (10 Gy) and postoperative external RT (50.4 Gy). Preoperative "flash" RT was included for the last 9 patients. The liver and pancreatic head received 5 Gy (two 2.5-Gy fractions) the day before surgery. In the subsequent period (1996-1998), 9 patients underwent preoperative concomitant chemoradiation (39.6 Gy) with 5-fluorouracil, IORT (10 Gy), and adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: Preoperative chemoradiation was completed in all patients, whereas postoperative therapy was completed in 13 of 17 patients. All 26 patients underwent pancreatectomy (25 R0 and one R1 resections). One patient died of postoperative complications (3.8%) not related to IORT. The 9 patients undergoing concomitant chemoradiation were candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy; however, only 4 of 9 underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. At last follow-up, 4 patients (15.4%) were alive and disease free. Disease recurrence was documented in 20 patients (76.9%). Sixteen patients (61.5%) showed distant metastasis, and 5 patients (19.2%) showed local recurrence. The incidence of local recurrence in R0 patients was 4 of 25 (16.0%). The overall 5-year survival rate was 15.4%. There was significant correlation with overall survival of tumor diameter (p=0.019). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of local recurrence in this long follow-up series (19.2%) was definitely less than that reported in other studies of adjuvant RT (approximately 50%), suggesting a positive impact on local control of integrated adjuvant RT (IORT+external RT).

Preoperative chemoradiation and intra-operative radiotherapy for pancreatic carcinoma.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: In recent years, preoperative chemoradiation has received growing interest for the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer. In an attempt to improve resectability and disease control, we used preoperative radiation therapy and concomitant 5-fluorouracil in a combined modality therapy protocol. The aim of the study was to evaluate definitive results in terms of toxicity, response and clinical outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with unresectable (cT4, 19 patients) or resectable (cT3, 9 patients) nonmetastatic pancreatic tumors received radiotherapy (39.6 Gy) plus 5-fluorouracil (continuous infusion, days 1-4 at 1000 mg/m(2)/day). After 4 weeks, patients were evaluated for surgical resection. In 9 resected patients, electron-beam intra-operative radiotherapy (10 Gy) was given before reconstruction. Thereafter, in resected patients, adjuvant chemotherapy was prescribed. RESULTS: During chemoradiation, 1 patient (3.6%) developed grade 3 acute gastrointestinal toxicity and 2 patients (7.1%) developed grade 3 hematological toxicity. Three of 19 patients with unresectable tumors had tumor downstaging (15.8%). Two patients showed partial response (response rate, 7.1%; 95% CI, 0.2-25.3) and 4 patients (14.3%) had minimal tumor response. Four patients (14.3%) showed progressive disease after chemoradiation. One postoperative death was recorded. The median survival time was 11.3 months (20.5 and 9.0 months in resected and unresected patients, respectively). Only one local failure was recorded in 8 patients resected with negative margins. CONCLUSIONS: Although the response rate is still low, our preliminary results suggest that preoperative 5-fluorouracil chemoradiation is well tolerated and may result in tumor downstaging. Delivery of intra-operative radiotherapy seems to be associated with a low rate of local recurrences.

Neoplastic mesorectal microfoci (MMF) following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: clinical and prognostic implications.

BACKGROUND: Neoplastic microfoci have frequently been found in the mesorectum, with poor outcome. In this study, incidence and clinical significance of mesorectal microfoci (MMF) were analyzed in patients operated upon for rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation. METHODS: A case series of 68 patients with extraperitoneal rectal cancer, treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery (including total mesorectal excision), was investigated for the presence of neoplastic MMF. RESULTS: Mesorectal microfoci were found in 26 cases (38.2%). Increasing incidence of microfoci was statistically related to pathologic involvement of bowel wall (P = 0.0006), Mandard's tumor regression grading (P = 0.0006) and pathologic neoplastic mesorectal involvement (P < 0.00001). None of the nine patients with complete tumor disappearance displayed both microfoci and lymph node metastasis. Only one local recurrence developed in a patient with multiple MMF. Out of 9 pT0 or TRG1 patients, 1 (11.1%) had distant metastases, compared to 15 out of 59 pT1-4 or TRG2-5 (25.4%, P = 0.70). CONCLUSIONS: A remarkable incidence of MMF was found following chemoradiation. However, when this therapy induces complete regression of primary tumor (pT0-TRG1), node metastases and neoplastic MMF could also disappear, as shown in our cases. These features should be confirmed because they could significantly impact the treatment decision-making of rectal cancers.

The multidisciplinary rectal cancer treatment: main convergences, controversial aspects and investigational areas which support the need for an European Consensus.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: During the past decades staging and treatment of rectal cancer are used different in Europe and in North America. To promote a process to integrate the daily practice with the best evidence of the literature an International Conference was organized in Italy. Agreement between Experts, Centres, and specialists who participated in the Conference are reported. METHODS: Five aspects were analyzed and a questionnaire was tailored for this purpose. The questionnaire had 159 questions. During the Conference, at the beginning of each Session, the moderators showed the answers from the Experts and the Centres, and, at the end of the session, the audience voted in all controversial issues. Agreements were scored at three levels: minimum, if it was between 51 and 74% of votes for each group; moderate, between 75 and 94%; large, more than 94%. RESULTS: The main results are: staging: endoanal ultrasound was considered as mandatory in T staging, in the evaluation of sphincter infiltration, and in the restaging of T after chemoradiotherapy (chRT). Magnetic Resonance Imaging is mandatory in the evaluation of mesorectal fascia infiltration. Endoscopy had a moderate agreement for the definition of tumour location, and the barium enema as optional. Digital rectal examination is complementary for staging and PET-CT investigational for T, N and yT staging. Preoperative radiotherapy: for T4 stage chRT was always the preferred treatment, often with moderate agreement, for any tumour location and N status. For T3, chRT received the same agreement except for high location and N0-N1. For T2 stage, N2 and positive nodes outside the mesorectum, chRT received minimum agreement for low and middle tumours; for high tumours only positive nodes outside the mesorectum was agreed upon. Preoperative radiotherapy, negative specimen and sphincter preservation: chRT was agreed by many for all T stages and N presentations of lower third tumours, except for T1-2 N0-N1. Postoperative treatments: the selection for these treatments often received moderate agreement according to the infiltration of surrounding organs, positive nodal status and circumferential radial margins. Therapy of metastatic disease: an agreement was found for FOLFOX as first-line therapy and for FOLFIRI as second-line, although comparative studies show similar activity of FOLFOX and FOLFIRI regimens. CONCLUSIONS: This process represents an expertise opinion process that may contribute to increased scientific debate and to promote the development of 'guidelines', 'clinical recommendations' and ultimately a Consensus on the evolving approach to rectal cancer treatment.

Concomitant radiochemotherapy plus surgery in locally advanced cervical cancer: update of clinical outcome and cyclooxygenase-2 as predictor of treatment susceptibility.

OBJECTIVE: We have updated our findings on the efficacy of concomitant radiochemotherapy plus radical surgery in a larger series of patients (n = 54) with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). We also investigated the role of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in this clinical setting. METHODS: Radiotherapy was administered to the whole pelvic region (1.8 Gy/day, totaling 39.6 Gy) in combination with cisplatin (20 mg/m2) and 5-fluorouracil (1,000 mg/m2) (both on days 1-4 and 27-30). Radical surgery was performed 5-6 weeks after the end of treatment. RESULTS: A clinical complete or partial response was observed in all 53 evaluable patients (75.5 and 24.5%, respectively). At pathological examination, 23 of 51 patients (45.1%) undergoing radical surgery showed complete response to treatment, 18 patients (35.3%) only had microscopic residual disease, 6 patients (11.7%) had a partial response and 4 (7.8%) had no change in their disease. When logistic regression was applied, the FIGO stage (chi2 = 5.28, p = 0.021) and tumor to stroma COX-2 ratio (chi2 = 4.72, p = 0.029) retained an independent role in the prediction of the pathologic response to treatment. The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 75.2%, with local relapse-free survival of 86.2% and metastasis-free interval of 89.9% at 3 years. Cases with a high COX-2 ratio showed a shorter DFS than cases with a low COX-2 ratio (p = 0.016). A direct association was shown between COX-2 ratio values and risk of recurrence, as assessed by Cox analysis using COX-2 ratio values as a continuous covariate (chi2 = 3.94, p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: This study confirms the possibility of achieving a very high rate of pathological responses in LACC patients administered chemoradiation plus surgery (3-year DFS 75.2%). Moreover, COX-2 status may play a role in the prognostic characterization and prediction of tumor response.

Complete response after chemoradiation in ampullary carcinoma: a case report.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: The case of a 70-year-old patient with resectable, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater is presented. PATIENT AND METHODS: Due to intraoperative hemorrhagic complications, surgical resection was not feasible. The patient was treated with radiochemotherapy consisting of external beam radiotherapy (50.4 Gy; 1.8 Gy/fraction; 5 fractions/week) plus 5-FU (1000 mg/m2/day, continuous i.v. infusion, days 2-5, week 1 and 5 of radiotherapy) and mitomycin C (10 mg/m2 i.v., day 2, week 1 of radiotherapy). RESULTS: At five years' follow-up the patient was in good general condition, without any signs of disease according to CT scan, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and tumor marker determination. Multiple random biopsies performed in the ampullary region were negative for tumor growth. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ampullary carcinoma the use of concurrent chemoradiation should be considered, particularly when surgical resection is unfeasible due to medical contraindications or locally advanced disease.

Combined-modality therapy in locally advanced primary rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Patients with unresectable, locally advanced rectal cancer are reported to have a dismal prognosis. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of combined-modality therapy on clinical outcome. METHODS: From March 1990 to December 1997, 43 patients (28 males; median age, 62 years; median follow-up, 74 months) with locally advanced (T4 and/or N3) nonmetastatic rectal cancer received external-beam radiation (23.6 plus 23.6 Gy (split course), 8 patients; 45 Gy, 35 patients) plus 5-fluorouracil (96-hour continuous infusion, Days 1-4, at 1,000 mg/m(2)/day) and mitomycin C (10 mg/m, intravenous bolus, Day 1). Concomitant chemotherapy was repeated at the beginning of the second course (split-course group) or in the last week of radiotherapy (continuous-course group). After 6 to 8 weeks, patients were evaluated for surgical resection and intraoperative radiation therapy (10 to 15 Gy). Thereafter, adjuvant chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin, 6-9 courses) was prescribed. RESULTS: During chemoradiation, 5 patients (11.6 percent) developed Grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicity. After chemoradiation, 29 patients (67.4 percent) had an objective clinical response (complete response, 2.3 percent; partial response, 65.1 percent). Thirty-eight patients underwent radical surgery (anterior resection, 24 patients; abdominoperineal resection, 14 patients; intraoperative radiation therapy boost on the tumor bed, 19 patients), and 2 patients had partial tumor resection. No perioperative deaths occurred in the patient group. Five-year survival and local control rates were 59.9 and 69.1 percent, respectively. Distant metastasis occurred in 44.2 percent of patients. Statistically significant relationships between intraoperative radiation therapy and local control (P = 0.0104), radical surgery and survival (P = 0.0120), and adjuvant chemotherapy and disease-free survival (P = 0.0112) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that combined-modality therapy was relatively well tolerated and resulted in good local control and survival. With regard to the impact of surgical resection on survival, additional studies aimed at improving the local response rate are necessary, whereas the positive impact of intraoperative radiotherapy on local control appears to justify the inclusion of this therapeutic modality in prospective multi-institutional trials.