Minimally invasive management of Bartholin gland abscesses (with demonstrative video).

Bartholin gland abscesses are common problems in women and their management represents a mainstay of gynecology. Various treatment methods have been described. We present a technique performed under local anesthesia, without hospitalization or postoperative care. As part of a minimally invasive approach, this procedure promotes therapeutic de-escalation, has high patient acceptance, improves clinical outcomes and reduces costs. The procedure is highlighted through an instructive video article which standardizes the essential steps, to make the technique ergonomics and easy to perform (step-by-step explanation).

Randomized clinical trial of sacral nerve stimulation for refractory constipation.

BACKGROUND: Open studies have reported favourable results for sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of refractory constipation. Here, its efficacy was assessed in a double-blind crossover RCT. METHODS: Patients with at least two of the following criteria were included: fewer than three bowel movements per week; straining to evacuate on more than 25 per cent of attempts; or sensation of incomplete evacuation on more than 25 per cent of occasions. Response to therapy was defined as at least three bowel movements per week and/or more than 50 per cent improvement in symptoms. Responders to an initial 3-week peripheral nerve evaluation were offered permanent implantation of a pulse generator and were assigned randomly in a crossover design to two 8-week intervals of active or sham stimulation. At the end of the two trial periods, the patients received active stimulation until the final evaluation at 1 year. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (34 women; mean(s.d.) age 45(14) years) underwent peripheral nerve evaluation. Twenty responded and received a permanent stimulator. A positive response was observed in 12 of 20 and 11 of 20 patients after active and sham stimulation periods respectively (P = 0·746). Pain related to the device occurred in five patients and wound infection or haematoma in three, leading to definitive removal of the pulse generator in two patients. At 1 year, 11 of the 20 patients with an implanted device continued to respond. Stimulation had no significant effect on colonic transit time. CONCLUSION: These results do not support the recommendation of permanent implantation of a pulse generator in patients with refractory constipation who initially responded to temporary nerve stimulation. Registration number: NCT01629303 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

[Hysterectomy for benign pathology: Guidelines for clinical practice]. / Hystérectomie pour pathologie bénigne: recommandations pour la pratique clinique.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to provide guidelines for clinical practice from the French college of obstetrics and gynecology (CNGOF), based on the best evidence available, concerning hysterectomy for benign pathology. METHODS: Each recommendation for practice was allocated a grade which depends on the level of evidence (guidelines for clinical practice method). RESULTS: Hysterectomy should be performed by a high volume surgeon (>10 procedures of hysterectomy per year) (grade C). Rectal enema stimulant laxatives are not recommended prior to hysterectomy (grade C). It is recommended to carry out vaginal disinfection using povidone iodine solution prior to an hysterectomy (grade B). Antibioprophylaxis is recommended during a hysterectomy, regardless of the surgical route (grade B). The vaginal or the laparoscopic routes are recommended for hysterectomy for benign pathology (grade B), even if the uterus is large and/or the patient is obese (grade C). The choice between these two surgical approaches depends on others parameters, such as the surgeon's experience, the mode of anesthesia and organizational constraints (operative duration and medico economic factors). Hysterectomy by vaginal route is not contraindicated in nulliparous women (grade C) or in women with previous c-section (grade C). No specific technique to achieve hemostasis is recommended with a view to avoid urinary tract injuries (grade C). In the absence of ovarian pathology and personal or family history of breast/ovarian carcinoma, it is recommended to conserve ovaries in pre-menopausal women (grade B). Subtotal hysterectomy is not recommended in order to diminish the risk of per- or postoperative complications (grade B). CONCLUSION: The application of these recommendations should minimize risks associated with hysterectomy.

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in ovarian cancer.

Ovarian cancer remains the fourth leading cause of cancer death in women in France. It is all too often diagnosed at an advanced stage with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), but remains confined to the peritoneal cavity throughout much of its natural history. Because of cellular selection pressure over time, most tumor recurrences eventually develop resistance to systemic platinum. Options for salvage therapy include alternative systemic chemotherapies and further cytoreductive surgery (CRS), but the prognosis remains poor. Over the past two decades, a new therapeutic approach to PC has been developed that combines CRS with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). This treatment strategy has already been shown to be effective in non-gynecologic carcinomatosis in numerous reports. There is a strong rationale for the use of HIPEC for PC of ovarian origin. On the one hand, three prospective randomized trials have demonstrated the superiority of intraperitoneal chemotherapy (without hyperthermia) in selected patients compared to systemic chemotherapy. Moreover, retrospective studies and case-control studies of HIPEC have reported encouraging survival data, especially when used to treat chemoresistant recurrence. However, HIPEC has specific morbidity and mortality; this calls for very careful selection of eligible patients by a multidisciplinary team in specialized centers. HIPEC needs to be evaluated by means of randomized trials for ovarian cancer at different developmental stages: as first line therapy, as consolidation, and for chemoresistant recurrence. Several European phase III studies are currently ongoing.

[Prospective evaluation of an intravaginal electrical stimulation in the treatment of women with pure genuine stress urinary incontinence]. / Évaluation prospective d'un dispositif de rééducation périnéale à domicile dans l'incontinence urinaire d'effort féminine.

OBJECTIVES: To study the objective and subjective effectiveness of transvaginal electrical stimulation for treatment of female pure genuine stress incontinence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter prospective trial including 207 patients with genuine stress incontinence who used the stimulator for 10 weeks. Similar pre-treatment and post-treatment assessments included both validated symptom severity index and health-related quality of life. RESULTS: Objective evaluation showed a significant improvement in 65.7% of subjects with stress incontinence. All domains of quality of life improved significantly after treatment (P=0.0001) and rate of satisfactory was 84.7%. There were no statistical differences between the two stimulators. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Pelvic floor electrical stimulation seems to be effective in treating female genuine stress incontinence and could be considered first-line therapy.

Saline spa water or combined water and UV-B for psoriasis vs conventional UV-B: lessons from the Salies de Béarn randomized study.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of UV-B therapy and saline spa water given alone or in combination for the treatment of psoriasis. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, comparative study with blinded observers. SETTING: Salies de Béarn, saline spa water center located in the southwest of France. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-one adult patients with psoriasis with a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score greater than 10. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatments: spa water alone (group A); UV-B 311-nm phototherapy alone (group B); and a combination of the 2 therapies (group C). The 3 groups were treated on a daily basis 5 days a week for a total of 21 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in PASI score from baseline as determined by an investigator blinded to randomization; variation in quality of life, adverse effects, and long-term effects (1 year after treatment). RESULTS: Four patients dropped out because of secondary effects. Efficacy was similar in groups B and C, with changes in PASI of -64% and -55%, respectively at 3 weeks. For group A, change in PASI was -29%, thus showing a minor therapeutic effect of saline spa water alone and poor efficacy compared with groups B and C (P<.001). More adverse effects were reported in groups A and C but did not reach significance. Combined saline spa water and UV-B therapy had no sparing effect on UV-B dosages. One year after treatment, no long-term benefit could be attributed specifically to a given regimen, but the patients had overall significantly better PASI scores than at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Saline spa water alone had a minor therapeutic effect in psoriasis, and the beneficial effect of bathing to enhance phototherapy was not demonstrated.

Comparison of genotypic and phenotypic resistance patterns of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates from patients treated with stavudine and didanosine or zidovudine and lamivudine.

Sequencing of reverse-transcriptase genes and recombinant virus assays were performed on paired isolates from antiretroviral drug-naive patients randomized to stavudine and didanosine (group 1; n = 21) or zidovudine and lamivudine (group 2; n = 21) at baseline and after > or = 12 months of follow-up. The T215Y mutation emerged in 13 (61.9%) and 2 (9.5%) isolates in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P < .0001). Furthermore, in group 1, mutations associated with multidideoxynucleoside resistance were selected in 3 isolates. In group 2, all isolates carried the M184V mutation. The median fold changes in susceptibilities to zidovudine, stavudine, and lamivudine were 16.4 and 1, 2.2 and 0.6, and 4.5 and > 38 in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P < .0001, all comparisons). These results suggest that the combination of stavudine and didanosine is associated more frequently with the emergence of zidovudine resistance and a decrease in susceptibility to stavudine than the combination of zidovudine and lamivudine.