Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Followed by Lipiodol Infusion for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus: A Single-Center Experience.

Background and Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) followed by lipiodol infusion in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). Materials and Methods: Thirty-two patients with advanced HCC and PVTT who received HAIC with regimens of cisplatin, mitomycin-C, and 5-fluorouracil followed by lipiodol infusion were enrolled. The primary efficacy endpoint was tumor response rate. The modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) was used for assessment of treatment response. The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Prognostic factors for survival also were evaluated. Results: The median OS and PFS were 11.9 and 9.5 months, respectively. Seventeen patients (53.1%) achieved objective response, and 23 patients (71.9%) achieved disease control. The length of survival in the responder and disease control groups was longer than in the non-responder and progressive disease groups after two cycles of HAIC (responder vs. non-responder: 16.5 vs. 7.9 months, p = 0.001; disease control vs. progressive disease: 12.3 vs. 5.6 months, p < 0.001) and after completing HAIC (responder vs. non-responder: 15.7 vs. 6.9 months, p = 0.001; disease control vs. progressive disease: 13.6 vs. 6.9 months, p < 0.001). Better survival was associated with Child-Pugh A liver function (p = 0.013), with early response to two HAIC cycles (p = 0.009), and with response (p = 0.02) and disease control (p = 0.001) after completing HAIC treatment. Conclusion: HAIC followed by lipiodol infusion is a safe and feasible treatment for advanced HCC with PVTT. Patients with early response could continue HAIC treatment with expected prolonged survival.

Cost-effectiveness of sorafenib versus SBRT for unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been shown to improve overall survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of SBRT compared to sorafenib which is the only drug for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: A Markov decision-analytic model was performed to compare the cost-effectiveness of SBRT and sorafenib for unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Patients transitioned between three health states: stable disease, progression disease and death. We calculated the data on cost from the perspective of our National Health Insurance Bureau. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine the impact of several variables. RESULTS: The incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) for sorafenib compared to SBRT was NT$3,788,238 per quality-adjusted life year gained (cost/QALY), which was higher than the willingness to pay threshold of Taiwan according to WHO's guideline. One-way sensitivity analysis revealed that the utility of progression disease for the sorafenib treatment, utility of progression free survival for SBRT, utility of progression free survival for sorafenib, utility of PFS to progression disease for SBRT and transition probability of progression disease to dead for SBRT were the most sensitive parameters in all cost scenarios. The Monte-Carlo simulation demonstrated that the probability of cost-effectiveness at a willingness to pay threshold of NT$ 2,213,145 per QALY was 100 % and 0 % chance for SBRT and sorafenib. CONCLUSION: This study indicated that SBRT for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma is cost-effective at a willingness to pay threshold as defined by WHO guideline in Taiwan.

Exposure to sennoside-digoxin interaction and risk of digoxin toxicity: a population-based nested case-control study.

AIMS: Digoxin is an important medication for heart failure (HF) patients and sennosides are widely used to treat constipation. Recently, safety concerns have been raised about a possible interaction between sennosides and digoxin, an issue that has not been studied empirically. This study therefore aimed to evaluate whether exposure to sennoside-digoxin interaction is associated with an increased risk of digoxin toxicity. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a population-based nested case-control study that analysed data obtained from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database between 1 January 2001 and 31 December 2004. All HF patients treated with digoxin for the first time were included as the study cohort. Of these, cases were identified as subjects hospitalized for digoxin toxicity (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, ICD-9-CM 972.1), and matched to randomly selected controls. Use of sennosides was compared between the two groups. Odds ratios (ORs) were employed to quantify the risk associated with exposure to sennoside-digoxin interaction by conditional logistic regression. The study cohort comprised 222,527 HF patients, of whom 524 were identified as cases and 2,502 as matched controls. Use of sennosides during the 14 days preceding the index date was found to be associated with a 1.61-fold increased risk of digoxin toxicity [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.15, 2.25]. Additionally, a greater risk was observed for sennosides prescribed at an average daily dose ≥ 24 mg (adjusted OR = 1.93; 95% CI = 1.27, 2.94). CONCLUSION: The combined use of sennosides and digoxin was found to be associated with a modest increased risk of digoxin toxicity in HF patients.

Multikinase inhibitors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: indirect comparison meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of multikinase inhibitors sunitinib, sorafenib, and pazopanib have reported efficacy compared with results from placebo and interferon-α (INF-α). To date, these drugs have not been compared in head-to-head trials. OBJECTIVE: To review systematically the evidence of clinical effectiveness of multikinase inhibitors in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and, via an indirect meta-analysis, to determine an optimal treatment among these agents. METHODS: A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CANCERLIT, and Cochrane controlled trials register databases was performed. All RCTs of multikinase inhibitors (sorafenib, sunitinib, and pazopanib) used to treat mRCC were included. The study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed independently by 2 reviewers, with all disagreements being resolved by consensus. The effects of multikinase inhibitors on progression-free survival (PFS) were compared using an indirect treatment comparison method with INF-α or placebo as a comparator. RESULTS: Four studies were included. Two studies examined sunitinib or sorafenib versus IFN-α, and the other 2 studies investigated sorafenib or pazopanib versus placebo. Compared with placebo, 2 interventions reported improvement for PFS (sorafenib: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.44, P = 0.01; pazopanib: HR = 0.46, P = 0.0001), whereas only sunitinib improved PFS over IFN-α (HR = 0.539, P = 0.001). An indirect comparison suggests that sunitinib is likely to demonstrate greater clinical benefit than sorafenib in terms of PFS (HR = 0.47; 95% CI, 0.316-0.713; P < 0.001), using IFN-α as the comparator. Sorafenib was not statistically different from pazopanib using placebo as the comparator in the indirect comparison (HR = 0.957; 95% CI, 0.657-1.39; P = 0.24). CONCLUSION: Some multikinase inhibitors have a favorably reported PFS for patients with mRCC compared with results using IFN-α or placebo. Our findings suggest that sunitinib might offer some clinical benefit over sorafenib in terms of PFS. No statistical difference was found between sorafenib and pazopanib treatments. However, these conclusions are based on 2 indirect comparisons of single RCTs. More RCTs are required to confirm these findings and investigate the clinical effectiveness of multikinase inhibitors in the treatment of mRCC.

Risk of hemorrhage associated with co-prescriptions for Ginkgo biloba and antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to explore the risk of hemorrhage associated with co-prescriptions for Ginkgo biloba extract (GBE) and antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents, and evaluate the trends of co-prescriptions. METHODS: A retrospective population based study was performed by using claim data of the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database from 2000 to 2008. Prescriptions for GBE alone and in combination with antiplatelet/anticoagulant drugs were retrieved and the odds ratio for co-prescriptions after the first prescription of GBE was explored. RESULTS: The total number of prescriptions for GBE alone or in combination with antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents increased gradually from 1547 (0.08%) and 3575 (0.19%) in 2000 to 4676 (0.23%) and 15,297 (0.79%) in 2008, respectively. GBE was mostly prescribed to patients aged 60 years or older. The adjusted odds ratio for co-prescriptions associated with the risk of hemorrhage is 1.5 (95% confidence interval, 0.5-5.0). The risk of hemorrhage was associated with patients aged ≥65 and male patients, who were prescribed GBE alone (adjusted odds ratio: 3.8 and 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 2.8-5.2 and 1.1-1.9). CONCLUSIONS: Although the combination of G. biloba extract with antiplatelet or anticoagulants showed insignificant correlation to the risk of hemorrhage, patients using ginkgo, particularly those with known bleeding risks and elderly, should take a particular attention to the possibility of increasing risk of bleeding.

Multivitamin supplement use and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The association between consumption of multivitamins and breast cancer is inconsistent in epidemiologic studies. OBJECTIVE: To perform a meta-analysis of cohort and case-control studies to evaluate multivitamin intake and its relationship with breast cancer risk. METHODS: The published literature was systematically searched and reviewed using MEDLINE (1950 through July 2010), EMBASE (1980 through July 2010), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2010 issue 1). Studies that included specific risk estimates were pooled using a random-effects model. The bias and quality of these studies were assessed with REVMAN statistical software (version 5.0) and the GRADE method of the Cochrane Collaboration. RESULTS: Eight of 27 studies that included 355,080 subjects were available for analysis. The total duration of multivitamin use in these trials ranged from 3 to 10 years. The frequency of current use in these studies ranged from 2 to 6 times/week. In analyses by duration of use 10 years or longer or 3 years or longer and by frequency 7 or more times/week that were reported in these studies, multivitamin use was not significantly associated with the risk of breast cancer. Only 1 recent Swedish cohort study concluded that multivitamin use is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. The results of a meta-analysis that pooled data from 5 cohort studies and 3 case-control studies indicated that the overall multivariable relative risk and odds ratio were 0.10 (95% CI 0.60 to 1.63; p = 0.98) and 1.00 (95% CI 0.51 to 1.00; p = 1.00), respectively. The association was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Multivitamin use is likely not associated with a significant increased or decreased risk of breast cancer, but these results highlight the need for more case-control studies or randomized controlled clinical trials to further examine this relationship.

Evodiamine stabilizes topoisomerase I-DNA cleavable complex to inhibit topoisomerase I activity.

Evodiamine (EVO), an alkaloidal compound isolated from Evodia rutaecarpa (Juss.), has been reported to affect many physiological functions. Topoisomerase inhibitors have been developed in a variety of clinical applications. In the present study, we report the topoisomerase I (TopI) inhibitory activity of EVO, which may have properties that lead to improved therapeutic benefits. EVO is able to inhibit supercoiled plasmid DNA relaxation catalyzed by TopI. Upon treatment 0-10 microM EVO TopI was depleted in MCF-7 breast cancer cells in a concentration-dependent and time-dependent manner in 0-120 min. A K-SDS precipitation assay was performed to measure the extent of Top I-trapped chromosomal DNA. The ability of EVO to cause the formation of a TopI-DNA complex increased in a concentration-dependent manner, in that the DNA trapped increased by 24.2% in cells treated with 30 microM. The results suggest that EVO inhibits TopI by stabilizing the enzyme and DNA covalent complex.

Interaction between traditional Chinese medicine and Western medicine in rats--In-Chen-How and acetaminophen.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the interaction effects of In-Chen-How (Artemisia capillaries Thunb.) on the pharmacokinetics of acetaminophen and on liver microsomal cytochrome P450 enzyme activity in rats. The rats were divided into control group (n = 8) without In-Chen-How and the pretreated group (n = 8) administered with In-Chen-How (approximately 1.0 mL x kg(-1), according to weight) for 5 consecutive days. Rats in the control group received water simultaneously. Each rat was then given acetaminophen. The pharmacokinetic parameters of acetaminophen of the two groups were significantly different. In the In-Chen-How pretreated group, the maximum concentration of acetaminophen and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve were reduced about 58.4%, 56.7% and 55.4%. To further explain the results, liver microsomal suspensions were obtained from rats that were randomly divided into control and In-Chen-How pretreated group. The levels of CYP1A2 and CYP2E1 in hepatic microsomal protein from pretreated group were increased as compared to that from the control group. It indicated that In-Chen-How can stimulate the activity of CYP isozymes. The changes in the pharmacokinetics of acetaminophen resulting from the administration of In-Chen-How are related to an increase in metabolic activity of CYP1A2 and CYP2E1.