Rivaroxaban for prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism.

Until recently, heparins and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) were the cornerstones for prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). This situation changed with the introduction of the direct oral anticoagulants, which are now replacing low-molecular-weight heparin for thromboprophylaxis after elective hip or knee arthroplasty and VKAs for VTE treatment. Rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, was the first direct oral anticoagulant licensed for VTE prevention and treatment. This paper provides the rationale for factor Xa as a target for anticoagulants, describes the development of rivaroxaban, reviews its pharmacological profile, discusses the clinical trials with rivaroxaban for VTE prevention and treatment and highlights areas of uncertainty.

Long-Term Management of Venous Thromboembolism: Lessons from EINSTEIN CHOICE and Other Extension Trials.

Many patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) are at risk of recurrence if anticoagulant therapy is stopped. Whereas 3 months of anticoagulation treatment is sufficient for patients with VTE provoked by major surgery or trauma, in many cases a longer course is needed. Extended therapy with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) requires frequent coagulation monitoring and dose adjustments to ensure that the international normalized ratio (INR) remains within the therapeutic range; furthermore, there is a risk of major bleeding even if a therapeutic INR is maintained. Therefore, more convenient and safer anticoagulants are needed.The non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs)-apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban and rivaroxaban-simplify extended therapy because they can be given in fixed doses without routine coagulation monitoring. Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of NOACs for extended VTE treatment, but bleeding remains a concern. Patients and physicians may, therefore, be reluctant to continue anticoagulation beyond 3 to 6 months except in patients at high risk of recurrence. Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) is often prescribed instead of an anticoagulant because of its perceived lower risk of bleeding; however, the recent EINSTEIN CHOICE trial demonstrated that once-daily rivaroxaban at a dose of either 20 or 10 mg reduced the risk of recurrent VTE by 70% compared with ASA without significantly increasing the risk of bleeding. In this review, we discuss the EINSTEIN CHOICE trial in the context of previous trials for extended VTE treatment and examine some of the lessons that can be applied to clinical practice.

Antithrombotic Agents.

Recent advances in our understanding of the contribution of thrombin generation to arterial thrombosis and the role of platelets in venous thrombosis have prompted new treatment paradigms. Nonetheless, bleeding remains the major side effect of such treatments spurring the quest for new antithrombotic regimens with better benefit-risk profiles and for safer anticoagulants for existing and new indications. The aims of this article are to review the results of recent trials aimed at enhancing the benefit-risk profile of antithrombotic therapy and explain how these findings are changing our approach to the management of arterial and venous thrombosis. Focusing on these 2 aspects of thrombosis management, this article discusses 4 advances: (1) the observation that in some indications, lowering the dose of some direct oral anticoagulants reduces the risk of bleeding without compromising efficacy, (2) the recognition that aspirin is not only effective for secondary prevention of atherothrombosis but also for prevention of venous thromboembolism, (3) the finding that dual pathway inhibition with the combination of low-dose rivaroxaban to attenuate thrombin generation plus aspirin to reduce thromboxane A2-mediated platelet activation is superior to aspirin or rivaroxaban alone for prevention of atherothrombosis in patients with coronary or peripheral artery disease, and (4) the development of inhibitors of factor XI or XII as potentially safer anticoagulants.

The Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Heart Disease: Section V-Special Situations.

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) include dabigatran, which inhibits thrombin, and apixaban, betrixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban, which inhibit factor Xa. In large clinical trials comparing the NOACs with the vitamin K antagonist (VKA) warfarin, dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban and edoxaban were at least as effective for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and for treatment of venous thromboembolism, but were associated with less intracranial bleeding. In addition, the NOACs are more convenient to administer than VKAs because they can be given in fixed doses without routine coagulation monitoring. Consequently, the NOACs are now replacing VKAs for these indications, and their use is increasing. Although, as a class, the NOACs have a favourable benefit-risk profile compared with VKAs, choosing among them is complicated because they have not been compared in head-to-head trials. Therefore, selection depends on the results of the individual trials, renal function, the potential for drug-drug interactions and preference for once- or twice-daily dosing. In addition, several 'special situations' were not adequately studied in the dedicated clinical trials. For these situations, knowledge of the unique pharmacological features of the various NOACs and judicious cross-trial comparison can help inform prescription choices. The purpose of this position article is therefore to help clinicians choose the right anticoagulant for the right patient at the right dose by reviewing a variety of special situations not widely studied in clinical trials.

Utility of a Nurse-Led Pathway for Patients with Acute Venous Thromboembolism Discharged on Rivaroxaban: A Prospective Cohort Study.

The highest risk of adverse events for patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) is during the early anticoagulation period. However, no established model exists for early clinical monitoring of patients treated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). The authors' aim was to evaluate the utility of a nurse-led pathway to minimize adverse events in acute VTE patients starting on rivaroxaban. The rivaroxaban VTE treatment pathway is a prospective cohort study of consecutive patients with objectively confirmed VTE between July 2015 and May 2017. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients identified at major risk of adverse events (bleeding or recurrent VTE). Secondary outcomes were rates of interventions, major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB), recurrent VTE, and all-cause mortality at 90 days. Among 304 participants, 5% (n = 15) were identified to be at major and 9% (n = 28) at possible risk for adverse events. Appropriate interventions to prevent harm were required in 40 patients. Rates of major bleeding, CRNMB, recurrence, and all-cause mortality were 0.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.1-1.8), 7.2% (95% CI: 4.8-10.7), 1.0 (95% CI: 0.3-2.9), and 1.6% (95% CI: 0.7-3.8), respectively. In conclusion, following discharge of acute VTE patients, a nurse-led pathway identified one in seven (14%) patients at major or possible risk of adverse events. Preemptive interventions to reduce harm translated into the low rates of bleeding and recurrence. The authors' experience highlights the feasibility and importance of a structured clinical surveillance pathway for acute VTE patients initiating NOAC therapy.

Advances in Antithrombotic Therapy.

Thrombosis remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Consequently, advances in antithrombotic therapy are needed to reduce the disease burden. This article focuses on 2 such advances. First, the prevention of atherothrombosis in patients with coronary or peripheral artery disease, which has been enhanced by the finding that the combination of low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin is superior to aspirin alone for prevention of recurrent ischemic events. However, this benefit comes at the cost of increased bleeding albeit not fatal bleeding. To overcome this problem, the second advance is the identification of factor XI as a target for new anticoagulants that are potentially safer than those currently available.

New oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: impact of study design, double counting and unexpected findings on interpretation of study results and conclusions.

Four recently introduced new oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban) have been shown to be at least as efficacious and safe as warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation in their respective trials. The first three have been approved, while edoxaban is awaiting regulatory approval. Several guidelines have endorsed the approved new oral anticoagulants over warfarin because of their favourable risk-benefit ratio, low propensity for food and drug interactions, and lack of requirement for routine coagulation monitoring. In this invited review, we summarise the results of the four studies and discuss widely held conclusions. We take a step further and discuss how differences in study design, analysis plan, and unexpected events affect the interpretation of the study results. Finally, we take our re-interpretation of study results and discuss how they might impact clinical practice and anticoagulant choice for patients.