Effects of caffeinated coffee consumption on intraocular pressure, ocular perfusion pressure, and ocular pulse amplitude: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: To examine the effects of caffeinated coffee consumption on intraocular pressure (IOP), ocular perfusion pressure (OPP), and ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) in those with or at risk for primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). METHODS: We conducted a prospective, double-masked, crossover, randomized controlled trial with 106 subjects: 22 with high tension POAG, 18 with normal tension POAG, 20 with ocular hypertension, 21 POAG suspects, and 25 healthy participants. Subjects ingested either 237 ml of caffeinated (182 mg caffeine) or decaffeinated (4 mg caffeine) coffee for the first visit and the alternate beverage for the second visit. Blood pressure (BP) and pascal dynamic contour tonometer measurements of IOP, OPA, and heart rate were measured before and at 60 and 90 min after coffee ingestion per visit. OPP was calculated from BP and IOP measurements. Results were analysed using paired t-tests. Multivariable models assessed determinants of IOP, OPP, and OPA changes. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline IOP, OPP, and OPA between the caffeinated and decaffeinated visits. After caffeinated as compared with decaffeinated coffee ingestion, mean mm Hg changes (± SD) in IOP, OPP, and OPA were as follows: 0.99 (± 1.52, P<0.0001), 1.57 (± 6.40, P=0.0129), and 0.23 (± 0.52, P<0.0001) at 60 min, respectively; and 1.06 (± 1.67, P<0.0001), 1.26 (± 6.23, P=0.0398), and 0.18 (± 0.52, P=0.0006) at 90 min, respectively. Regression analyses revealed sporadic and inconsistent associations with IOP, OPP, and OPA changes. CONCLUSION: Consuming one cup of caffeinated coffee (182 mg caffeine) statistically increases, but likely does not clinically impact, IOP and OPP in those with or at risk for POAG.

Three patients with lead poisoning following use of a Chinese herbal pill.

We report on three patients with lead poisoning following use of the Chinese herbal pill Bao ning dan, prepared by the same traditional Chinese medicine practitioner. The patients had varying degrees of exposure to Bao ning dan and different clinical manifestations. Blood lead concentrations did not correlate with clinical severity. Two patients received chelating therapy and blood lead concentrations subsequently rapidly decreased. One patient was managed conservatively and end-organ complications resolved gradually. With increasing use of traditional Chinese medicines, related adverse reactions are expected to become increasingly common. Practitioners of western medicine should remain alert to this possibility. A comprehensive drug review, including the use of herbal medicines, should form a routine part of medical history taking.

Toxic effects of cholelitholytic solvents on gallbladder and liver. A piglet model study.

We evaluated the toxic effects of four currently used chemolytic solvents--dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, 99%), ethyl propionate (EP, 99%), tetrasodium ethyl-dimethyl tetraacetate (4Na-EDTA, 2%, pH 11), and methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE, purity = 99.5%) in an animal model. Each solvent was tested in nine farm piglets (Landrace), weighing between 20 and 25 kg. A solvent-resistant catheter was inserted transhepatically into the gallbladder (GB) using sonographic guidance 24 hr prior to each experiment. Seventy-five milliliters of each solvent was infused over 3 hr into the gallbladder. The following day, a laparotomy was performed in order to assess for possible damage to the liver, GB, bile ducts (BD), or intestines. The GB and liver were resected and their histology examined. The following pathologic grades were assigned to GB, BD, and liver specimens to describe the tissue damage: normal (0), mild (1), moderate (2), and severe (3). We found that DMSO had the highest score on gallbladder and bile duct injury (49, 3), followed by EP (36, 2), EDTA (14, 1) and MTBE (16, 0), respectively; the difference in gallbladder damage was statistically significant. Very mild hepatocyte damage was present in the DMSO (2) and MTBE (2) groups. The administration of EP and EDTA resulted in no liver injury at all. Piglets within each treatment group suffered from varying degrees of tissue injury. No deaths were attributed to the administered solvents. We concluded that DMSO, EP, EDTA, and MTBE do not have serious local toxic effect on the GB, BD, and intestine; nor do they lead to severe hepatotoxicity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)