Institution-Wide Retreats Foster Organizational Learning and Action at a Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Providing safe and informed healthcare for sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals with cancer is stymied by the lack of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data reliably available in health records and by insufficient training for staff. Approaches that support institutional learning, especially around sensitive topics, are essential for hospitals seeking to improve practices impacting patient safety and research. We engineered annual institutional retreats to identify and unify stakeholders, promote awareness of gaps and needs, identify initiatives, minimize redundant projects, and coordinate efforts that promote improvements in SGM cancer care, education, and research. The 2022 and 2023 retreats employed a 4-h hybrid format allowing virtual and in-person engagement. Retreat organizers facilitated small-group discussions for brainstorming among participants. We performed descriptive statistics from retreat evaluations. The retreats engaged 104 attendees from distinct departments and roles. Participants expressed robust satisfaction, commending the retreat organization and content quality. Notably, the first retreat yielded leadership endorsement and funding for a Quality Improvement pilot to standardize SOGI data collection and clinical staff training. The second retreat provided a platform for updates on focused efforts across the institution and for receiving direction regarding national best practices for SGM care and research. We report the processes and outcomes of institution-wide retreats, which served as a platform for identifying gaps in organizational healthcare practices and research for SGM individuals with cancer. The strategies described herein may be readily scaled at other cancer hospitals seeking to learn and enact system-wide practice changes that support the needs of SGM patients and families.

Learning Through Doing: Comprehensive Programming for a Training Program in Cancer Disparities.

In the United States, preparing researchers and practitioners for careers in cancer requires multiple components for success. In this reflection article, we discuss our approach to designing a comprehensive research training program in cancer disparities. We focused on elements that provide students and early career scientists a deep understanding of disparities through first-hand experiences and skills training necessary to build a research career in the area. Our Educational Program sits within the framework of an NCI P20 program, "UHAND (University of Houston/MD Anderson Cancer Center)", jointly established by an NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center and a minority-serving university as a collaborative partnership devoted to the elimination of cancer inequities among disproportionately affected racial and ethnic groups (UHAND Program to Reduce Cancer Disparities; NCI P20CA221696/ P20CA221697). The Education Program was designed to build on and enhance skills that are critical to pursuing a career in cancer disparities research at the undergraduate, doctoral, and post-doctoral levels-such as scientific communication, career planning and development, professional and community-based collaboration, and resilience in addition to solid scientific training. As such, our program integrates (1) opportunities for learning through service to community organizations providing resources to populations with documented cancer disparities, (2) a tailored curriculum of learning activities with program leadership and mentored research with scientists focused on cancer disparities and cancer prevention, (3) professional development training critical to career success in disparities research, and (4) support to address unique challenges faced by trainees from backgrounds that are historically underrepresented in research.

Pathways and Barriers to Careers in Academic Clinical Cancer Prevention: a Qualitative Study.

National surveys document steady declines over time in interest in academic medicine and cancer prevention careers (Am J Prev Med 54(3):444-8, 2018). Through interviews with 16 academic cancer prevention physicians at one comprehensive cancer center, this study identifies motivations and barriers to physician careers in academic cancer prevention and proposes recommendations to increase recruitment. Participants reported that cancer prevention was vague to them early in training, impairing career exploration. Further, without role models and opportunities to learn about cancer prevention, many were ignorant of career options. Many had incorrect views about cancer prevention practice being mainly within the scope of primary care physicians, and some reported colleagues viewing the rigor of cancer prevention skeptically. However, all described notable experiences-in classes, with mentors, on research projects, or from encounters with patients, motivating them to pursue academic clinical cancer prevention regardless of challenges. Clearly, a lack of both information and guidance towards careers in clinical cancer prevention has been critical barriers to robust recruitment of physicians to the field and must be addressed urgently. Helping physicians earlier during training to both understand the value of prevention and cultivate their interests in it, particularly for clinical cancer prevention, would have widespread benefits.

Lifestyle behavior patterns and mortality among adults in the NHANES 1988-1994 population: A latent profile analysis.

Evidence suggests interdependent associations of individual modifiable behaviors with health outcomes. However, such interrelations have not been accounted for in previous behavior-outcome associations. We conducted latent profile analysis (LPA) on self-reported levels of alcohol consumption, restaurant dining, vitamin/mineral supplement use, physical activity (PA) and smoke exposure (first- and second-hand smoke) separately for smokers (N = 4530) and non-smokers (N = 13,421) using data from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) to identify subgroups with similar levels within and across behaviors. Cox-proportional hazards models were used to compare mortality rates between subgroups from cancer, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-causes at an average of 16.4 (±6.1) years follow-up. Five behavioral typologies were identified in non-smokers ("Moderates", "Low Risk Factors", "Restaurant Diners", "Moderate Passive Smokers" and "Heavy Passive Smokers"), and four in smokers ("Moderates", "Low Risk Factors", "Heavy Smokers" and "Physically Active"). As a group, "Moderates" had levels of each behavior that were not significantly different from at least one other group. Compared to "Moderates", in non-smokers "Restaurant Diners" had lower hazard from all-cause (hazard ratio (HR):0.84, 95% CI:0.74-0.97) and CVD (HR:0.59, 0.43-0.82) mortality, while "Low Risk Factors" had higher cancer mortality (HR:1.38,1.03-1.84). In smokers, compared to "Moderates", higher hazards for mortality were found for "Heavy Smokers" (all cause: HR:1.34, 1.12-1.60; CVD: HR:1.52, 1.04-2.23; cancer: HR:1.41 1.02-1.96) and "Low Risk Factors" (all-cause: HR:1.58, 1.14-2.17). Taken together, when restaurant dining, PA and smoking exposures are grouped together, novel predictions for mortality occur, suggesting data on multiple behaviors may be informative for risk stratification.

Effect of dietary intake of phytoestrogens on estrogen receptor status in premenopausal women with breast cancer.

Although many dietary studies have focused on breast cancer risk, few have examined dietary influence on tumor characteristics such as estrogen receptor (ER) status. Because phytoestrogens may modulate hormone levels and ER expression, we analyzed ER status and phytoestrogen intake in a case-case study of 124 premenopausal breast cancer patients. We assessed intake with a food-frequency questionnaire and obtained ER status from medical records. Rather than focusing on risk, we evaluated whether low intakes were more strongly associated with ER-negative tumors than with ER-positive disease. In logistic regression adjusting for potential confounders, threefold greater risks of ER-negative tumors relative to ER-positive tumors were associated with low intake of the isoflavones genistein (odds ratio, OR=3.50; 95% confidence interval, CI=1.43-8.58) and daidzein (OR=3.10; 95% CI=1.31-7.30). Low intake of the flavonoid kaempferol (OR=0.36; 95% CI=0.16-0.83), the trace element boron (OR=0.33; 95% CI=0.13-0.83), and the phytosterol beta-sitosterol (OR=0.42; 95% CI=0.18-0.98) were associated with decreased risk of ER-negative tumors relative to ER-positive disease. Other phytoestrogens were not significantly associated with ER status. Thus, in premenopausal patients, some phytoestrogens may affect breast carcinogenesis by influencing ER status. Such findings suggest new directions for mechanistic research on dietary factors in breast carcinogenesis that may have relevance for prevention and clinical treatment.