[Paradigm shift in understanding Acute kidney injury in patients with chronic liver disease: From pathophysiology to defining disease entities]. / Paradigmenwechsel im Verständnis der akuten Nierenschädigung bei chronischer Leberinsuffizienz: Von der Pathophysiologie zur Definition von Krankheitsentitäten.

The hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is only a part of the wide spectrum of renal injury in patients with end-stage liver cirrhosis. Besides that, the advanced liver disease itself, or its underlying causes, as well as comorbidities, like diabetes mellitus, adiposity and arterial hypertension, can directly cause parenchymal renal insults (bile acid nephropathy, ischemic tubular injury, diabetic/hypertensive nephropathy, hepatitis B- and C-associated glomerulonephritis etc.). This kind of kidney injury is collectively described as non-hepatorenal syndrome AKI (non-HRS AKI. Beyond that, accumulating evidence highlights the role of systemic inflammation as an important common factor in the pathogenesis of decompensated liver cirrhosis, acute in chronic liver failure (ACLF) and renal dysfunction.In this review, we discuss recent data about definition, classification and pathophysiology of HRS, HRS-AKI and Non-HRS-AKI and exploit in this regard the diagnostic and prognostic potential of respective newer serum and urine markers.

Biopsy proven acute interstitial nephritis after treatment with moxifloxacin.

BACKGROUND: Acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) is an important cause of reversible acute kidney injury. At least 70% of AIN is caused by various drugs, mainly penicillins and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Quinolones are only rarely known to cause AIN and so far cases have been mainly described with older fluoroquinolones. CASE PRESENTATION: Here we describe a case of biopsy proven interstitial nephritis after moxifloxacin treatment. The patient presented with fever, rigors and dialysis dependent acute kidney injury, just a few days after treatment of a respiratory tract infection with moxifloxacin. The renal biopsy revealed dense infiltrates mainly composed of eosinophils and severe interstitial edema. A course of oral prednisolone (1 mg/kg/day) was commenced and rapidly tapered to zero within three weeks. The renal function improved, and the patient was discharged with a creatinine of 107 micromol/l. CONCLUSION: This case illustrates that pharmacovigilance is important to early detect rare side effects, such as AIN, even in drugs with a favourable risk/benefit ratio such as moxifloxacin.

The role of fixed-dose combinations in the management of hypertension: focus on lercanidipine-enalapril.

Achieving optimal blood pressure (BP) control is the most important single issue in the management of hypertension, and in most patients, it is difficult or impossible to achieve target levels with one drug. Blocking two or more regulatory systems provides a more effective and more physiologic reduction in BP, and current guidelines have recommended the use of combination therapy as first-line treatment, or early in the management of hypertension. Fixed-dose combination therapy is an efficacious, relatively safe and cost-effective treatment option in most patients with essential hypertension. Of note, the once-daily administration of a fixed-dose enalapril/lercanidipine, by bringing together two distinct and complementary mechanisms of action, reduces BP effectively and has the potential for improved target organ protection relative to either class agent alone.