Quarterly screening optimizes detection of sexually transmitted infections when prescribing HIV preexposure prophylaxis.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal screening frequency of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) for MSM and transgender women (TGW) on HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is unclear, with present guidelines recommending screening every 3-6 months. We aimed to determine the number of STIs for which treatment would have been delayed without quarterly screening. DESIGN: The US PrEP Demonstration Project was a prospective, open-label cohort study that evaluated PrEP delivery in STI clinics in San Francisco and Miami, and a community health center in Washington, DC. In all, 557 HIV-uninfected MSM and TGW were offered up to 48 weeks of PrEP and screened quarterly for STIs. METHODS: The proportion of gonorrhea, chlamydia, and syphilis infections for which treatment would have been delayed had screening been conducted every 6 versus every 3 months was determined by taking the number of asymptomatic STIs at weeks 12 and 36 divided by the total number of infections during the study follow-up period for each STI. RESULTS: Among the participants, 50.9% had an STI during follow-up. If screening had been conducted only semiannually or based on symptoms, identification of 34.3% of gonorrhea, 40.0% of chlamydia, and 20.4% of syphilis infections would have been delayed by up to 3 months. The vast majority of participants (89.2%) with asymptomatic STIs reported condomless anal sex and had a mean of 8.1 partners between quarterly visits. CONCLUSIONS: Quarterly STI screening among MSM on PrEP could prevent a substantial number of partners from being exposed to asymptomatic STIs, and decrease transmission.

Antibiotics for anthrax: patient requests and physician prescribing practices during the 2001 New York City attacks.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about patient encounters with primary care physicians and prescribing practices during the 2001 US anthrax attacks. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical record of outpatient telephone and clinic visits at a large primary care practice in New York City from September 11 to December 31, 2001, to identify physician- and patient-related factors that were associated with prescribing antibiotics for anthrax prophylaxis. RESULTS: Average daily patient volume from October to December was higher in 2001 (221.2 patients per day) compared with 2000 (199.1; P<.01) and 2002 (215.8; P = .14). Patient-initiated discussion about anthrax or smallpox were involved in 244 patient contacts with 63 physicians, including 92 (0.6%) of 14917 telephone contacts and 152 (1.0%) of 15 539 office visits. Fifty patients (21%) requested antibiotics or vaccines and 52 (22%) received antibiotics: 39 received ciprofloxacin; 12, doxycycline; and 1, both drugs. Independent predictors of receiving anthrax prophylaxis included requesting medication (odds ratio [OR], 8.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.5-18.6), reporting powder or workplace exposure (OR, 4.5; 95% CI, 2.1-10.0), having an abnormal physical examination finding (OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.4-11.0), and being asymptomatic (reporting any illness symptoms was associated with an OR of 0.3 [95% CI, 0.1-0.6]). CONCLUSIONS: Primary care physicians played an important and heretofore underdocumented role in responding to the 2001 anthrax attacks. Prescription of prophylactic antibiotics for anthrax was uncommon and appears to have been selective among concerned patients. These results highlight the importance of including primary care physicians in community-wide bioterrorism response planning.