Effects of a low-protein nutritional formula with dietary counseling in older adults with chronic kidney disease stages 3-5: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Although combining a low-protein diet (LPD) with oral nutritional supplements increases treatment adherence and nutritional status in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), the effect of this combination approach in older adults remains unclear. This study examined the impact of a 6% low-protein formula (6% LPF) with diet counseling in older adults with stage 3-5 CKD. METHODS: In this three-month randomized controlled study, 66 patients (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, non-dialysis, over 65 years of age) were randomly assigned to an intervention group (LPD plus a 6% LPF) or control group (LPD alone). The 6% LPF comprised 400 kcal, 6 g of protein, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and various micronutrients. All data were collected at baseline and after three months, including physical performance based on hand grip strength (HGS) and gait speed, nutritional status using Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF) scores, body composition through bioelectrical impedance analysis, and dietary intake from 24-h dietary records. RESULTS: This study incorporated 47 participants (median age, 73; median eGFR, 36 ml/min/1.73 m2; intervention group: 24; control group: 23). The intervention group exhibited significant differences in HGS and gait speed, and micronutrient analysis revealed significantly higher monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA), EPA, DHA, calcium, iron, zinc, copper, thiamine, riboflavin, niacin, B6, B12, and folic acid intake than the control group. MNA-SF scores, macronutrient intake, and body composition did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to LPD counseling alone, an LPD prescription with 6% LPF in older adults with CKD stages 3-5 helped relieve physical deterioration and increased micronutrient intake after three months. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05318014 (retrospectively registered on 08/04/2022).

Effect of acupressure on alleviating constipation among inpatients with stroke during the acute phase: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study aimed to explore the effects of acupressure in alleviating constipation among inpatients with stroke in neurological departments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a two-arm, parallel, randomized, controlled trial conducted between September 2020 and August 2021. In total, 128 inpatients with stroke at the acute phase from neurological departments were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to either an acupressure group (ST25, CV12, and CV6) or a sham acupressure group for twice-daily therapy at 4 min per intervention for 7 days. The Bristol Stool Form Scale and Constipation Assessment Scale (CAS) were assessed at the beginning and completion of the study. A generalized estimating equation was used for data analyses. RESULTS: The mean ages were 63.8 ± 19.1 and 66.2 ± 16.0 years, and the average National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores were 7.2 ± 5.6 and 8.1 ± 6.3 points for the acupressure and sham acupressure groups, respectively. The acupressure group demonstrated gradually lower scores on the CAS over time than the sham acupressure group. Patients who received acupressure had a lower likelihood of requiring defecation medication and were more likely to have normal bowel movements and a decreased risk of their stool appearing as a hard lump than those who received sham acupressure over time. CONCLUSION: Traditional Chinese medicine-based acupressure can help alleviate constipation and reduce the use of defecation medication among inpatients with stroke who have been admitted to neurological departments. TRIAL AND PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05612646.

Chronic kidney disease, preoperative use of antispasmodics and lower resected prostate volume ratios are risk factors for postoperative use of adrenergic Alpha-blockers and antispasmodics.

OBJECTIVES: Transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) and laser prostate surgery are common surgeries for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). We conducted an investigation using hospital database to evaluate the clinical factors associated with post-operative usage of alpha-blockers and antispasmodics. METHODS: This study was conducted using retrospective clinical data from the hospital database, which contained newly diagnosed BPH patients between January 2007 and December 2012 who subsequently received prostate surgery. The study end-point was the use of alpha-blockers or antispasmodics for at least 3 months duration after 1 month of surgery. The exclusion criteria was prostate cancer diagnosed before or after the surgery, recent transurethral surgeries, history of open prostatectomy, and history of spinal cord injury. Clinical parameters, including age, body mass index, preoperative prostate specific antigen value, comorbidities, preoperative usage of alpha-blockers, anstispasmodics and 5-alpha reductase inhibitors, surgical methods, resected prostate volume ratios, and preoperative urine flow test results, were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 250 patients receiving prostate surgery in the database and confirmed pathologically benign were included. There was significant association between chronic kidney disease (CKD) and the usage of alpha-blockers after prostate surgery (OR = 1.93, 95% CI 1.04-3.56, p = 0.036). Postoperative antispasmodics usage was significantly associated with preoperative usage of antispasmodics (OR = 2.33, 95% CI 1.02-5.36, p = 0.046) and resected prostate volume ratio (OR = 0.12, 95% CI 0.02-0.63, p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: BPH patients with underlying CKD were more likely to require alpha-blockers after surgery. In the meantime, BPH patients who required antispasmodics before surgery and who received lower prostate volume resection ratio were more liable to antispasmodics after prostate surgery.

Degraded microarchitecture by low trabecular bone score is associated with prevalent vertebral fractures in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

PURPOSE: Recently, trabecular bone score (TBS) has emerged as an important supplementary assessment tool in osteoporosis diagnosis and management. The high incidence of fragility fracture within the non-osteoporotic range of bone mineral density (BMD), among systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients, highlights the crucial role of bone microarchitecture in osteoporosis. This study aimed to evaluate whether TBS identified existing vertebral fractures (VF) more accurately than BMD in SLE patients. METHODS: This study enrolled 147 SLE patients from the Asia Pacific Lupus Collaboration (APLC) cohort, who had BMD and TBS assessed from January 2018 until December 2018. Twenty-eight patients sustaining VF and risk factors associated with increased fracture occurrence were evaluated. Independent risk factors and diagnostic accuracy of VF were analyzed by logistic regression and ROC curve, respectively. RESULT: The prevalence of vertebral fracture among SLE patients was 19%. BMD, T-score, TBS, and TBS T-score were significantly lower in the vertebral fracture group. TBS exhibited higher positive predictive value and negative predictive value than L spine and left femur BMD for vertebral fractures. Moreover, TBS had a higher diagnostic accuracy than densitometric measurements (area under curve, 0.811 vs. 0.737 and 0.605). CONCLUSION: Degraded microarchitecture by TBS was associated with prevalent vertebral fractures in SLE patients. Our result suggests that TBS can be a complementary tool for assessing vertebral fracture prevalence in this population.