Therapeutic mechanism of combined oral chelation therapy to maximize efficacy of iron removal in transfusion-dependent thalassemia major - a pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: Three iron chelators are used to treat transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia: desferrioxamine (DFO), deferasirox (DFX), and deferiprone (DFP). Compliance is low for DFO as it cannot be administered orally. Combined administration of DFP and DFX is orally available, however, the therapeutic mechanism is unknown. This pilot study investigated the iron removal mechanisms of DFX and DFP treatment in patients with transfusion-dependent thalassemia major. METHODS: Each patient received three treatments sequentially: (1) DFX monotherapy, (2) DFP monotherapy, and (3) DFX/DFP combination therapy with a four-day washout period between each treatment. Urine and stool specimens were collected to determine the primary outcome of iron excretion volumes. RESULTS: The mean iron excretion was seven times higher after combination therapy with DFX and DFP. Monotherapies also increased excretions volumes, though to a significantly lesser degree. Combined administration of DFX and DFP achieves maximum iron removal in transfusion-dependent thalassemia major compared to monotherapy with either drug. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest combination therapy in chronic severe iron overload cases, especially for patients in poor compliance with DFO/DFP combination therapy or those exhibiting poor iron removal from DFX or DFP monotherapy.

PG2 for patients with acute spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

PG2 is an infusible polysaccharide extracted from Astragalus membranaceus, which is a Chinese herb traditionally used for stroke treatment. We investigated the effect of PG2 on patients with spontaneous acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). A total of 61 patients with acute spontaneous ICH were randomized to either the treatment group (TG, 30 patients), which received 3 doses of PG2 (500 mg, IV) per week for 2 weeks, or the control group (CG, 31 patients), which received PG2 placebo. At 84 days after PG2 administration, the percentage of patients with a good Glasgow outcome scale (GOS 4-5) score in the TG was similar to that in the CG (69.0% vs. 48.4%; p = 0.2). The percentage of good mRS scores (0-2) in the TG was similar to that in the CG (62.1% vs. 45.2%; p = 0.3). In addition, no significant differences were seen when comparing differences in the C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-1ß, tumor necrosis factor-α, and S100B levels between baseline and days 4, 7, and 14 after PG2 administration (all p > 0.05). The results are preliminary, necessitating a more thorough assessment.