Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Diagn Interv Radiol ; 29(1): 170-174, 2023 01 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36960593

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To examine the effectiveness and safety of two embolic agents, an ethanol-lipiodol emulsion and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) particles, for selective arterial embolization (SAE) of renal angiomyolipoma (AML). METHODS: Retrospectively, we reviewed the medical records and imaging data of renal AML patients who received SAE in our hospitals between July 2007 and January 2018. Among those eligible for analysis were patients with complete medical information, preoperative and postoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans, and follow-up data. An ethanol-lipiodol emulsion was used to embolize 15 AMLs, and PVA particles were used to embolize 16 AMLs. We compared the tumor responses and adverse events between the two embolization-agent groups. RESULTS: After embolization, no significant differences were observed in the shrinkage rates: 34.2% ± 3.4% for the ethanol-lipiodol emulsion group and 26.3% ± 3.0% for the PVA particles group (P = 0.090). Minor post-embolization complications were also similar between the groups, and there were no severe adverse events. The length of hospital stay after SAE was 2.5 ± 0.5 days for the ethanol-lipiodol emulsion group and 1.9 ± 0.5 days for the PVA particles group and was not significantly different (P = 0.425). CONCLUSION: The results showed that SAE with ethanol-lipiodol emulsion or PVA particles was safe and efficient in decreasing tumor size and controlling renal AML hemorrhage.


Asunto(s)
Angiomiolipoma , Embolización Terapéutica , Neoplasias Renales , Humanos , Angiomiolipoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Angiomiolipoma/terapia , Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Emulsiones , Etanol , Aceite Etiodizado , Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Renales/terapia , Alcohol Polivinílico/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 23(6): 521-7, 2011 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21537127

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Lipiodol transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is widely used to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recently, a drug-eluting bead (DEB) has been developed to enhance drug delivery to the tumor and reduce its systemic availability. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of intra-arterial injection of DEB loaded with doxorubicin versus conventional, Lipiodol-based TACE regimens in Asian patients with HCC. METHODS: The study was designed as a case-control, single-institution clinical trial. Twenty patients with HCC who received DEB loaded with 50 mg doxorubicin ('cases') were matched with 20 patients who had undergone conventional TACE ('controls'). The primary efficacy endpoint was tumor response at 1 month according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. The primary safety endpoint was liver toxicity. RESULTS: The rate of objective response by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors was 85% (17 of 20 patients) in the DEB arm versus 30% (six of 20 patients) in the conventional TACE arm (P=0.001). Subgroup analyses conducted in patients with large (>5 cm) or multinodular tumor confirmed significantly higher objective response rates in patients receiving DEB as compared with those treated with conventional TACE (P=0.003 and P=0.005, respectively). At the dose of 50 mg doxorubicin, there was no statistically significant difference in liver toxicity between DEB and conventional TACE (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: In Asian patients with HCC, transcatheter treatment with DEB loaded with doxorubicin offers a distinct advantage in objective tumor response rate as compared with conventional, Lipiodol-based TACE regimens.


Asunto(s)
Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Pueblo Asiatico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Quimioembolización Terapéutica , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Portadores de Fármacos , Aceite Etiodizado/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Anciano , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Pueblo Asiatico/estadística & datos numéricos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/etnología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Cateterismo Periférico , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Doxorrubicina/efectos adversos , Aceite Etiodizado/efectos adversos , Femenino , Arteria Hepática , Humanos , Inyecciones Intraarteriales , Neoplasias Hepáticas/etnología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , República de Corea , Factores de Tiempo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento , Carga Tumoral
3.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol ; 65(2): 373-82, 2010 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19763572

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has been reported to be effective in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: In this multicenter, prospective, open-labeled, clinical trial, we randomly assigned 68 patients with advanced HCC to receive either low-dose [n = 32, 5-fluorouracil (FU), 170 mg/m(2) and cisplatin, 7 mg/m(2) on days 1-5] or high-dose HAIC (n = 36, 5-FU, 500 mg/m(2) on days 1-3 and cisplatin, 60 mg/m(2) on day 2) every 4 weeks via an implantable port system. RESULTS: A total of 207 cycles of HAIC was given to the 68 patients. Overall, 6 patients (8.8%) achieved a partial response and 21 patients (30.9%) had stable disease. The objective response rate (CR + PR) was significantly improved in the high-dose group compared to the low-dose group (16.7% vs. 0%, P = 0.024). The median time to disease progression and overall survival were slightly prolonged in the high-dose group compared to the low-dose group (median survival, 193 vs. 153 days; P = 0.108; median time to disease progression, 145 vs. 90 days; P = 0.095). Multivariate analysis showed that tumor response to treatment [P = 0.007, RR 2.27 (95% CI, 1.248-4.132)] was the only factor associated with overall survival. All adverse events were tolerable and successfully managed in both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both HAIC regimens are safe and effective in patients with advanced HCC. High-dose HAIC achieves a better tumor response compared to low-dose HAIC.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Arteria Hepática , Humanos , Infusiones Intraarteriales , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia
4.
Korean J Radiol ; 8(2): 136-47, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17420631

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We wanted to determine whether transcatheter Ethiodol-based capillary embolization in combination with carboplatin could improve the efficiency of a 1:1 Ethiodol-ethanol mixture (EEM) to ablate kidneys that been inoculated with VX-2 carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The right kidney in 34 New Zealand white rabbits were inoculated with fresh VX-2 tumor fragments. One week later, the kidneys were subjected to transarterial treatment (4-5 rabbits/group): Saline infusion (Group 1); carboplatin infusion (5 or 10 mg, Groups 2A and 2B); carboplatin-Ethiodol (CE) alone (Group 3) and followed by main renal artery occlusion with ethanol (RAO) (Group 4); carboplatin-EEM (C-EEM) followed by RAO (Group 5); carboplatin infusion followed by EEM plus RAO (Group 6); and EEM followed by RAO (Group 7). The animals were followed for up to 3-weeks. The treated kidneys were evaluated angiographically and macroscopically. The kidneys that showed successful embolization macroscopically were entirely cut into serial sections, and these were examined microscopically. Histologically, the kidneys were evaluated on the basis of the residual tumor found in the serial sections. RESULTS: The results obtained with carboplatin infusion alone (Groups 2A and 2B) and CE without RAO (Group 3) were similar to those of the control animals (Group 1). Kidneys from Groups 4-7 demonstrated macroscopically successful embolization with histologically proven complete renal parenchyma infarction; however, some residual tumor was evident in all but one animal. CONCLUSION: None of the Ethiodol-based modalities combined with locoregional carboplatin were more efficacious for tumor ablation than EEM alone.


Asunto(s)
Carboplatino/administración & dosificación , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/métodos , Etanol/administración & dosificación , Aceite Etiodizado/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Renales/terapia , Angiografía , Animales , Inyecciones Intraarteriales , Conejos , Estadísticas no Paramétricas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA