Effect of Clostridium butyricum on High-Fat Diet-Induced Intestinal Inflammation and Production of Short-Chain Fatty Acids.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: A high-fat diet (HFD) can cause intestinal inflammation and alter the gut microbiota; probiotics, however, are known to have anti-inflammatory effects. This study aimed to investigate the response of rat colon to HFD and the effect of Clostridium butyricum on HFD-induced intestinal inflammation and production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) according to sex. METHODS: Male and female 6-week-old Fischer-344 rats were fed a chow diet or HFD for 8 weeks, and Biovita or three different concentrations of C. butyricum were orally gavaged. The levels of tight junction proteins (TJPs), inflammatory markers in the ascending colonic mucosa, and bile acids (BAs) and SCFAs in stool were measured. RESULTS: HFD significantly increased the histological inflammation scores and fat proportions. Fecal BA levels were higher in the HFD group than in the control group, with a more prominent increase in deoxycholic acid/cholic acid after probiotics administration in females; however, no statistically significant differences were observed. TJPs showed an opposite response to HFD depending on sex, and tended to increase and decrease after HFD in males and females, respectively. The HFD-reduced TJPs were recovered by probiotics, with some statistical significance in females. HFD-decreased butyric acid in stools appeared to be recovered by probiotics in males, but not in females. The expression of inflammatory markers (TNF-α) was increased by HFD in males and decreased with medium-concentration probiotic supplementation. The opposite was observed in females. MPO was increased by HFD in both sexes and decreased by probiotic supplementation. CONCLUSIONS: The probiotic C. butyricum improved indicators of HFD-induced colonic inflammation such as levels of inflammatory markers and increased the production of SCFAs and the expression of TJPs. These effects tended to be more pronounced in male rats, showing sex difference.

The Efficacy and Safety of GCWB104 (Flos Lonicera Extract) in Functional Dyspepsia: A Single-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.

Background/Aims: The Flos Lonicera extract GCWB104 has been shown to have significant protective effects against gastritis and gastric ulcers in vivo. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of GCWB104 in subjects with functional dyspepsia (FD). Methods: In this single-center, double-blind, randomized clinical trial, 92 subjects diagnosed with FD using the Rome III criteria were allocated to either the test group (300 mg of GCWB104, containing 125 mg of Flos Lonicera extract, twice daily) or the placebo group (300 mg placebo, twice daily). The total score improvement on the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) for individual symptoms, changes in antioxidant levels, changes in dyspepsia-related quality of life according to the Nepean Dyspepsia Index (NDI), and adverse effects were compared before and after 8 weeks of treatment. Results: The differences in total GSRS scores and score improvements after 8 weeks of treatment were significant between the GCWB104 and control groups (p=0.0452 and p=0.0486, respectively). Thirteen of 15 individual symptoms on the GSRS improved in the GCWB104 group, while six symptoms improved in the control group. In addition, statistically significant changes in rumbling, loose stool, and stool urgency were observed in the GCWB104 group. Blood 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) levels, known as antioxidants, showed significant reductions after 8 weeks of administration of GCWB104. There were no adverse events related to treatment with GCWB104. Conclusions: GCWB104 safely contributed to improvements in mild to moderate FD and irritable bowel syndrome symptoms. Antioxidant effects of GCWB104 were also suggested (Clinicaltrials.gov number NCT04008901).