Does the addition of glutamine to enteral feeds affect patient mortality?

OBJECTIVE: Studies have failed to consistently demonstrate improved survival in intensive care unit (ICU) patients receiving immune-modulating nutrient-enhanced enteral feeds when compared with standard enteral feeds. The objective was to study in a prospective fashion the effects of adding glutamine to standard or immune-modulated (supplemented with omega-3 fatty acids, beta-carotene, and amino acids such as glutamine and arginine) tube feeds. DESIGN: Prospective, unblinded study using sequential allocation. SETTING: A university surgical trauma ICU. PATIENTS: All surgical and trauma patients admitted to the surgical trauma ICU at a university hospital over a 3-yr period who were to receive enteral feeds (n = 185). INTERVENTIONS: Sequential assignment to three isocaloric, isonitrogenous diets was performed as follows: standard 1-kcal/mL feeds with added protein (group 1), standard feeds with the addition of 20-40 g/day (0.6 g/kg/day) glutamine (group 2), or an immune-modulated formula with similar addition of glutamine (group 3). The goal for all patients was 25-30 kcal/kg/day and 2 g/kg/day protein. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were followed until discharge from the hospital. The primary end point was in-hospital mortality, and multiple secondary end points were recorded. In-hospital mortality for group 1 was 6.3% (four of 64) vs. 16.9% (ten of 59, p = .09) for group 2 and 16.1% (ten of 62, p = .09) for group 3. After controlling for age and severity of illness, the difference in mortality between patients receiving standard tube feeds and all patients receiving glutamine was not significant (p < or = .11). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups for secondary end points. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of glutamine to standard enteral feeds or to an immunomodulatory formula did not improve outcomes. These findings suggest that enteral glutamine should not be routinely administered to patients with surgical critical illness.

Adenosine A2A receptor activation reduces inflammation and preserves pulmonary function in an in vivo model of lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Reperfusion injury continues to significantly affect patients undergoing lung transplantation. Isolated lung models have demonstrated that adenosine A 2A receptor activation preserves function while decreasing inflammation. We hypothesized that adenosine A 2A receptor activation by ATL-146e during the initial reperfusion period preserves pulmonary function and attenuates inflammation in a porcine model of lung transplantation. METHODS: Mature pig lungs preserved with Viaspan (Barr Laboratories, Pomona, NY) underwent 6 hours of cold ischemia before transplantation and 4 hours of reperfusion. Animals were treated with (ATL group, n = 7) and without (IR group, n = 7) ATL-146e (0.05 microg kg -1 . min -1 ATL-146e administered intravenously for 3 hours). With occlusion of the opposite pulmonary artery, the animal was maintained for the final 30 minutes on the allograft alone. Recipient lung physiology was monitored before tissue evaluation of pulmonary edema (wet-to-dry weight ratio), myeloperoxidase assay, and tissue tumor necrosis factor alpha by means of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: When the ATL group was compared with the IR group, the ATL group had better partial pressure of carbon dioxide (43.8 +/- 4.1 vs 68.9 +/- 6.3 mm Hg, P < .01) and partial pressure of oxygen (272.3 +/- 132.7 vs 100.1 +/- 21.4 mm Hg, P < .01). ATL-146e-treated animals exhibited lower pulmonary artery pressures (33.6 +/- 2.1 vs 47.9 +/- 3.5 mm Hg, P < .01) and mean airway pressures (16.25 +/- 0.08 vs 16.64 +/- 0.15 mm Hg, P = .04). ATL-146e-treated lungs had lower wet-to-dry ratios (5.9 +/- 0.39 vs 7.3 +/- 0.38, P < .02), lower myeloperoxidase levels (2.9 x 10 -5 +/- 1.2 x 10 -5 vs 1.3 x 10 -4 +/- 4.0 x 10 -5 DeltaOD mg -1 . min -1 , P = .03), and a trend toward decreased lung tumor necrosis factor alpha levels (57 +/- 12 vs 96 +/- 15 pg/mL, P = .06). The ATL group demonstrated significantly less inflammation on histology. CONCLUSION: Adenosine A 2A activation during early reperfusion attenuated lung inflammation and preserved pulmonary function in this model of lung transplantation. ATL-146e and similar compounds could play a significant role in improving outcomes of pulmonary transplantation.