RESUMEN
The effect of integrated treatment on the use of coercive measures in first-episode schizophrenia-spectrum disorder in Denmark is not known. A total of 328 patients were randomly assigned to integrated treatment (167 patients) or standard treatment (161 patients). Integrated treatment consisted of assertive community treatment, psycho-educational multi-family groups, and social skills training. Data on coercion were extracted from the register from the National Board of Health, and data on continuity from medical records. Even though the level of continuity seemed higher in integrated treatment, this did not reduce the use of coercive measures compared to the use in standard treatment.
Asunto(s)
Coerción , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Episodio de Atención , Esquizofrenia/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente , Dinamarca , Salud de la Familia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Registros Médicos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Conducta Social , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The families of patients with first-episode psychosis often play a major role in care and often experience lack of support. AIMS: To determine the effect of integrated treatment v. standard treatment on subjective burden of illness, expressed emotion (EE), knowledge of illness and satisfaction with treatment in key relatives of patients with a first episode of schizophrenia-spectrum disorder. METHOD: Patients with ICD-10 schizophrenia-spectrum disorders (first episode) were randomly assigned to integrated treatment or to standard treatment. Integrated treatment consisted of assertive community treatment, psychoeducational multi-family groups and social skills training. Key relatives were assessed with the Social Behaviour Assessment Schedule (SBAS, burden of illness), the 5-min speech sample (EE), and a multiple choice questionnaire at entry and after 1 year. RESULTS: Relatives in integrated treatment felt less burdened and were significantly more satisfied with treatment than relatives in standard treatment. There were no significant effects of intervention groups on knowledge of illness and EE. CONCLUSIONS: The integrated treatment reduced family burden of illness and improved satisfaction with treatment.