Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Nat Med ; 29(12): 3162-3174, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38049620

RESUMEN

Converging evidence indicates that impairments in executive function and information-processing speed limit quality of life and social reentry after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (msTBI). These deficits reflect dysfunction of frontostriatal networks for which the central lateral (CL) nucleus of the thalamus is a critical node. The primary objective of this feasibility study was to test the safety and efficacy of deep brain stimulation within the CL and the associated medial dorsal tegmental (CL/DTTm) tract.Six participants with msTBI, who were between 3 and 18 years post-injury, underwent surgery with electrode placement guided by imaging and subject-specific biophysical modeling to predict activation of the CL/DTTm tract. The primary efficacy measure was improvement in executive control indexed by processing speed on part B of the trail-making test.All six participants were safely implanted. Five participants completed the study and one was withdrawn for protocol non-compliance. Processing speed on part B of the trail-making test improved 15% to 52% from baseline, exceeding the 10% benchmark for improvement in all five cases.CL/DTTm deep brain stimulation can be safely applied and may improve executive control in patients with msTBI who are in the chronic phase of recovery.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02881151 .


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Estimulación Encefálica Profunda , Humanos , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/terapia , Estimulación Encefálica Profunda/métodos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Calidad de Vida , Tálamo/fisiología
2.
Pain ; 163(11): e1145-e1163, 2022 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35384928

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: What are the care-seeking priorities of people living with chronic pain and carers and how can these shape interdisciplinary workforce training to improve high-value pain care? Phase 1: Australian people living with chronic pain (n = 206; 90% female) and carers (n = 10; 40% female) described their pain care priorities (eDelphi, round 1). A coding framework was inductively derived from 842 pain care priorities (9 categories, 52 priorities), including validation; communication; multidisciplinary approaches; holistic care; partnerships; practitioner knowledge; self-management; medicines; and diagnosis. Phase 2: In eDelphi round 2, panellists (n = 170; valid responses) rated the importance (1 = less important; 9 = more important) of the represented framework. In parallel, cross-discipline health professionals (n = 267; 75% female) rated the importance of these same priorities. Applying the RAND-UCLA method (panel medians: 1-3: "not important," 4-6: "equivocal," or 7-9: "important"), "important" items were retained where the panel median score was >7 with panel agreement ≥70%, with 44 items (84.6%) retained. Specific workforce training targets included the following: empathic validation; effective, respectful, safe communication; and ensuring genuine partnerships in coplanning personalised care. Panellists and health professionals agreed or strongly agreed (95.7% and 95.2%, respectively) that this framework meaningfully reflected the importance in care seeking for pain. More than 74% of health professionals were fairly or extremely confident in their ability to support care priorities for 6 of 9 categories (66.7%). Phase 3: An interdisciplinary panel (n = 5) mapped an existing foundation-level workforce training program against the framework, identifying gaps and training targets. Recommendations were determined for framework adoption to genuinely shape, from a partnership perspective, Australian interdisciplinary pain training.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Automanejo , Australia , Cuidadores , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Femenino , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Masculino
3.
Pharmacol Res Perspect ; 8(6): e00688, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33280274

RESUMEN

Functional neurological disorders (FNDs), which are sometimes also referred to as psychogenic neurological disorders or conversion disorder, are common disabling neuropsychiatric disorders with limited treatment options. FNDs can present with sensory and/or motor symptoms, and, though they may mimic other neurological conditions, they are thought to occur via mechanisms other than those related to identifiable structural neuropathology and, in many cases, appear to be triggered and sustained by recognizable psychological factors. There is intriguing preliminary evidence to support the use of psychedelic-assisted therapy in a growing number of psychiatric illnesses, including FNDs. We review the theoretical arguments for and against exploring psychedelic-assisted therapy as a treatment for FNDs. We also provide an in-depth discussion of prior published cases detailing the use of psychedelics for psychosomatic conditions, analyzing therapeutic outcomes from a contemporary neuroscientific vantage as informed by several recent neuroimaging studies on psychedelics and FNDs.


Asunto(s)
Alucinógenos/uso terapéutico , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Animales , Teorema de Bayes , Encéfalo/efectos de los fármacos , Encéfalo/patología , Niño , Distonía/diagnóstico , Distonía/tratamiento farmacológico , Distonía/psicología , Femenino , Alucinógenos/farmacología , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/psicología
4.
Osteoarthr Cartil Open ; 2(4): 100123, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36474885

RESUMEN

Objective: To estimate the potential lifetime health gains, healthcare costs, and cost-effectiveness of recommended adjunctive treatments for knee osteoarthritis delivered in addition to established core treatments, relative to core treatment only, from the perspective of the New Zealand (NZ) healthcare sector. Design: Recommended adjunctive knee osteoarthritis treatments were identified in clinical practice guidelines. Evidence of effectiveness was sourced from existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Treatment costs were calculated by applying local reference prices to estimated resource use. We used a validated computer simulation model of the impacts of knee osteoarthritis to estimate the cost-effectiveness of each adjunctive treatment at willingness-to-pay thresholds of one (primary), two, and three times per-capita GDP ($NZ52 300). Results: Data were collected on nine recommended adjunctive treatments: aquatic-based exercise, heat therapy, massage therapy, walking cane, cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), oral NSAIDs, intra-articular corticosteroids, and duloxetine. Relative to core treatments only, walking cane and heat therapy were cost-saving and provided greater QALYs; aquatic exercise and intra-articular corticosteroids were also cost-effective at all WTP thresholds. Topical NSAIDs and CBT were cost-effective only at higher WTP thresholds, while duloxetine, massage therapy, and oral NSAIDs were not cost-effective at any relevant threshold. Results were generally robust to varying modelling assumptions, although topical and oral NSAIDs and CBT became cost-effective in some scenarios. Conclusions: Delivering high-value, low-cost adjunctive interventions for knee osteoarthritis, alongside recommended core treatment, could deliver substantial health gains at low cost to the health system.

5.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) ; 69(4): 567-577, 2017 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27273891

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To develop a globally informed framework to evaluate readiness for implementation and success after implementation of musculoskeletal models of care (MOCs). METHODS: Three phases were undertaken: 1) a qualitative study with 27 Australian subject matter experts (SMEs) to develop a draft framework; 2) an eDelphi study with an international panel of 93 SMEs across 30 nations to evaluate face validity, and refine and establish consensus on the framework components; and 3) translation of the framework into a user-focused resource and evaluation of its acceptability with the eDelphi panel. RESULTS: A comprehensive evaluation framework was developed for judging the readiness and success of musculoskeletal MOCs. The framework consists of 9 domains, with each domain containing a number of themes underpinned by detailed elements. In the first Delphi round, scores of "partly agree" or "completely agree" with the draft framework ranged 96.7%-100%. In the second round, "essential" scores ranged 58.6%-98.9%, resulting in 14 of 34 themes being classified as essential. SMEs strongly agreed or agreed that the final framework was useful (98.8%), usable (95.1%), credible (100%) and appealing (93.9%). Overall, 96.3% strongly supported or supported the final structure of the framework as it was presented, while 100%, 96.3%, and 100% strongly supported or supported the content within the readiness, initiating implementation, and success streams, respectively. CONCLUSION: An empirically derived framework to evaluate the readiness and success of musculoskeletal MOCs was strongly supported by an international panel of SMEs. The framework provides an important internationally applicable benchmark for the development, implementation, and evaluation of musculoskeletal MOCs.


Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/métodos , Modelos Organizacionales , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/terapia , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Humanos , Juicio , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/diagnóstico , Formulación de Políticas , Desarrollo de Programa , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Investigación Cualitativa , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
BMJ Open ; 6(12): e014007, 2016 12 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27940635

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate young people's experiences of persistent musculoskeletal pain, including care needs and current service gaps as well as perceptions about the role of digital technologies to support their co-care. METHODS: A qualitative study employing two independent data collection modes: in-depth individual semistructured interviews and focus groups. SETTING: Community settings throughout Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were included if they had experienced persistent musculoskeletal pain of >3-month duration with an average of ≥3 on the visual analogue scale over the preceding 3 months, including non-specific conditions (eg, low back pain) and specific conditions (eg, juvenile idiopathic arthritis and other systemic arthritides), with/without pre-existing or current diagnosed mental health conditions. 23 young people (87.0% women; mean (SD) age: 20.8 (2.4) years) from across 6 Australian jurisdictions participated. Almost two-thirds of participants with persistent musculoskeletal pain reported comorbid mental health conditions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Inductive and deductive approaches to analyse and derive key themes from verbatim transcripts. RESULTS: Participants described their daily experiences of living with persistent musculoskeletal pain, their fears and the challenges imposed by the invisibility of pain, and the two-way relationship between their pain and mental well-being. A lack of relevant and accessible information and resources tailored to young people's unique needs, integrated and youth-relevant healthcare services and adequately skilled healthcare practitioners were identified as key care gaps. Participants strongly advocated for the use of digital technologies to improve access to age-appropriate resources and support for co-care. CONCLUSIONS: Young people living with persistent musculoskeletal pain described the absence of age-appropriate pain services and clearly articulated their perceptions on the role of, and opportunities provided by, digital technologies to connect with and support improved pain healthcare. Innovative and digitally-enabled models of pain care are likely to be helpful for this group.


Asunto(s)
Información de Salud al Consumidor/normas , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/normas , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Dolor Musculoesquelético/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Australia , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Internet , Masculino , Aplicaciones Móviles , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Investigación Cualitativa , Adulto Joven
7.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol ; 25(4): 470-81, 2012 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22699321

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cardiac arrhythmias are a major source of morbidity and mortality. Many of these patients require diagnostic or therapeutic intervention in an electrophysiology laboratory with involvement of an anesthesiologist. The goal of this review is to provide the anesthesiologist with a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms underlying various arrhythmias; specific procedures performed for diagnosis and treatment, and associated risks. RECENT FINDINGS: With the introduction of new interventional electrophysiology techniques, anesthesiologists are facing new challenges during perioperative management of these complex procedures and patients. SUMMARY: By reviewing the current literature regarding electrophysiology procedures, this review will provide information essential to the anesthesiologist to safely care for this unique patient population.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia/métodos , Arritmias Cardíacas/fisiopatología , Técnicas Electrofisiológicas Cardíacas , Animales , Arritmias Cardíacas/etiología , Arritmias Cardíacas/terapia , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca , Ablación por Catéter , Desfibriladores Implantables , Técnicas Electrofisiológicas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Marcapaso Artificial
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA